Suppr超能文献

体重减轻诱导的前驱糖尿病缓解的机制:随机、对照、多中心前驱糖尿病生活方式干预研究(PLIS)的事后分析。

Mechanisms of weight loss-induced remission in people with prediabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled, multicentre Prediabetes Lifestyle Intervention Study (PLIS).

机构信息

German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases, Helmholtz Center Munich, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases, Helmholtz Center Munich, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Nov;11(11):798-810. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00235-8. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remission of type 2 diabetes can occur as a result of weight loss and is characterised by liver fat and pancreas fat reduction and recovered insulin secretion. In this analysis, we aimed to investigate the mechanisms of weight loss- induced remission in people with prediabetes.

METHODS

In this prespecified post-hoc analysis, weight loss-induced resolution of prediabetes in the randomised, controlled, multicentre Prediabetes Lifestyle Intervention Study (PLIS) was assessed, and the results were validated against participants from the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) study. For PLIS, between March 1, 2012, and Aug 31, 2016, participants were recruited from eight clinical study centres (including seven university hospitals) in Germany and randomly assigned to receive either a control intervention, a standard lifestyle intervention (ie, DPP-based intervention), or an intensified lifestyle intervention for 12 months. For DPP, participants were recruited from 23 clinical study centres in the USA between July 31, 1996, and May 18, 1999, and randomly assigned to receive either a standard lifestyle intervention, metformin, or placebo. In both PLIS and DPP, only participants who were randomly assigned to receive lifestyle intervention or placebo and who lost at least 5% of their bodyweight were included in this analysis. Responders were defined as people who returned to normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG; <5·6 mmol/L), normal glucose tolerance (<7·8 mmol/L), and HbA less than 39 mmol/mol after 12 months of lifestyle intervention or placebo or control intervention. Non-responders were defined as people who had FPG, 2 h glucose, or HbA more than these thresholds. The main outcomes for this analysis were insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and intrahepatic lipid content (IHL) and were evaluated via linear mixed models.

FINDINGS

Of 1160 participants recruited to PLIS, 298 (25·7%) had weight loss of 5% or more of their bodyweight at baseline. 128 (43%) of 298 participants were responders and 170 (57%) were non-responders. Responders were younger than non-responders (mean age 55·6 years [SD 9·9] vs 60·4 years [8·6]; p<0·0001). The DPP validation cohort included 683 participants who lost at least 5% of their bodyweight at baseline. Of these, 132 (19%) were responders and 551 (81%) were non-responders. In PLIS, BMI reduction was similar between responders and non-responders (responders mean at baseline 32·4 kg/m [SD 5·6] to mean at 12 months 29·0 kg/m [4·9] vs non-responders 32·1 kg/m [5·9] to 29·2 kg/m [5·4]; p=0·86). However, whole-body insulin sensitivity increased more in responders than in non-responders (mean at baseline 291 mL/[min × m], SD 60 to mean at 12 months 378 mL/[min × m], 56 vs 278 mL/[min × m], 62, to 323 mL/[min × m], 66; p<0·0001), whereas insulin secretion did not differ within groups over time or between groups (responders mean at baseline 175 pmol/mmol [SD 64] to mean at 12 months 163·7 pmol/mmol [60·6] vs non-responders 158·0 pmol/mmol [55·6] to 154·1 pmol/mmol [56·2]; p=0·46). IHL decreased in both groups, without a difference between groups (responders mean at baseline 10·1% [SD 8·7] to mean at 12 months 3·5% [3·9] vs non-responders 10·3% [8·1] to 4·2% [4·2]; p=0·34); however, VAT decreased more in responders than in non-responders (mean at baseline 6·2 L [SD 2·9] to mean at 12 months 4·1 L [2·3] vs 5·7 L [2·3] to 4·5 L [2·2]; p=0·0003). Responders had a 73% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes than non-responders in the 2 years after the intervention ended.

INTERPRETATION

By contrast to remission of type 2 diabetes, resolution of prediabetes was characterised by an improvement in insulin sensitivity and reduced VAT. Because return to normal glucose regulation (NGR) prevents development of type 2 diabetes, we propose the concept of remission of prediabetes in analogy to type 2 diabetes. We suggest that remission of prediabetes should be the primary therapeutic aim in individuals with prediabetes.

FUNDING

German Federal Ministry for Education and Research via the German Center for Diabetes Research; the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg; the Helmholtz Association and Helmholtz Munich; the Cluster of Excellence Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections; and the German Research Foundation.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病可因体重减轻而缓解,其特征为肝脂肪和胰腺脂肪减少,以及胰岛素分泌恢复。在这项分析中,我们旨在研究在患有前驱糖尿病的人群中,体重减轻诱导缓解的机制。

方法

在这项预先设定的事后分析中,评估了随机、对照、多中心的前驱糖尿病生活方式干预研究(PLIS)中体重减轻诱导的前驱糖尿病缓解情况,并将结果与糖尿病预防计划(DPP)研究中的参与者进行了验证。对于 PLIS,在 2012 年 3 月 1 日至 2016 年 8 月 31 日期间,从德国的 8 个临床研究中心(包括 7 家大学医院)招募了参与者,并随机分配接受对照组、标准生活方式干预(即基于 DPP 的干预)或强化生活方式干预 12 个月。对于 DPP,在 1996 年 7 月 31 日至 1999 年 5 月 18 日期间,从美国的 23 个临床研究中心招募了参与者,并随机分配接受标准生活方式干预、二甲双胍或安慰剂。在 PLIS 和 DPP 中,仅纳入那些随机分配接受生活方式干预或安慰剂且体重减轻至少 5%的参与者进行此分析。应答者被定义为在接受生活方式干预或安慰剂 12 个月后,空腹血糖(FPG)<5.6mmol/L、葡萄糖耐量正常(<7.8mmol/L)和 HbA 小于 39mmol/mol 的人。无应答者被定义为 FPG、2 小时血糖或 HbA 高于这些阈值的人。此分析的主要结果是胰岛素敏感性、胰岛素分泌、内脏脂肪组织(VAT)和肝内脂质含量(IHL),并通过线性混合模型进行评估。

结果

在 PLIS 中招募的 1160 名参与者中,有 298 名(25.7%)的体重减轻了 5%或更多。在 298 名参与者中,有 128 名(43%)是应答者,170 名(57%)是无应答者。应答者比无应答者年轻(平均年龄 55.6 岁[9.9]比 60.4 岁[8.6];p<0.0001)。DPP 验证队列包括 1160 名基线时体重减轻至少 5%的参与者。其中,有 132 名(19%)是应答者,551 名(81%)是无应答者。在 PLIS 中,体重指数(BMI)的降低在应答者和无应答者之间相似(应答者基线时的平均 BMI 为 32.4kg/m2[5.6],12 个月时为 29.0kg/m2[4.9],无应答者为 32.1kg/m2[5.9],12 个月时为 29.2kg/m2[5.4];p=0.86)。然而,在应答者中,全身胰岛素敏感性的增加比无应答者更多(基线时的平均胰岛素敏感性为 291mL/[min × m],SD 为 60,到 12 个月时的平均胰岛素敏感性为 378mL/[min × m],56,p<0.0001),而胰岛素分泌在组内和组间在时间上没有差异(应答者基线时的平均胰岛素分泌为 175pmol/mmol[64],12 个月时的平均胰岛素分泌为 163.7pmol/mmol[60.6],无应答者为 158.0pmol/mmol[55.6],12 个月时的平均胰岛素分泌为 154.1pmol/mmol[56.2];p=0.46)。IHL 在两组中均降低,组间无差异(应答者基线时的平均 IHL 为 10.1%[8.7],12 个月时的平均 IHL 为 3.5%[3.9],无应答者为 10.3%[8.1],12 个月时的平均 IHL 为 4.2%[4.2];p=0.34);然而,VAT 在应答者中比无应答者降低更多(基线时的平均 VAT 为 6.2L[2.9],12 个月时的平均 VAT 为 4.1L[2.3],无应答者为 5.7L[2.3],12 个月时的平均 VAT 为 4.5L[2.2];p=0.0003)。在干预结束后 2 年内,应答者患 2 型糖尿病的风险比无应答者低 73%。

结论

与 2 型糖尿病缓解不同,前驱糖尿病的缓解特征是胰岛素敏感性的改善和 VAT 的减少。由于恢复正常葡萄糖调节(NGR)可预防 2 型糖尿病的发生,我们提出了类似 2 型糖尿病的前驱糖尿病缓解的概念。我们建议,前驱糖尿病的缓解应成为患有前驱糖尿病的个体的主要治疗目标。

资金

德国联邦教育和研究部通过德国糖尿病研究中心;巴登-符腾堡州科学、研究和艺术部;亥姆霍兹协会和亥姆霍兹慕尼黑;控制感染微生物的卓越集群;德国研究基金会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验