• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷圈套切除术后冷圈套缺陷突出和息肉不完全切除:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Cold snare defect protrusion and incomplete polyp resection after forced cold snare polypectomy: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Ota-ku, Japan.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):14-21. doi: 10.1055/a-2183-5505. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1055/a-2183-5505
PMID:37769690
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cold snare defect protrusions (CSDPs) that occur after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are considered indicators of incomplete polyp resection (IPR). We have sometimes experienced difficulty resecting polyps with snaring alone; in such cases, a forcible pull on the snare by the endoscopist is necessary. We call this procedure "forced CSP (FCSP)." However, no previous studies have evaluated this procedure.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. From November 2020 to June 2021, the frequency, safety, and validity of FCSP were evaluated at our hospital. We distinguished CSP with snaring alone performed by the assistant as conventional CSP, and CSP requiring a forcible pull on the snare by the endoscopist as FCSP.

RESULTS

Of 1315 polyps removed, 105 underwent FCSP (8%). The perforation rate was 0% in both groups. The rate of CSDP after the procedure was 96.2% (101/105) with FCSP and 6.4% (77/1210) with conventional CSP (<0.001). The rate of IPR was 12.5% (13/104) with FCSP and 6.2% (75/1208) with conventional CSP (=0.02). Multivariable analysis identified polyps located in the cecum (risk ratio [RR], 1.13; 95%CI 1.050-1.179; =0.003) and polyps ≥6mm in diameter (RR, 2.37; 95%CI 2.146-2.542; <0.001) as independent risk factors for FCSP.

CONCLUSIONS

FCSP was performed on 105 polyps (8%) in this study. FCSP may be associated with the occurrence of CSDP and IPR. Further studies are necessary to confirm our results.

摘要

背景

冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)后出现的冷圈套缺陷突出物(CSDP)被认为是息肉切除不完全(IPR)的指标。我们有时会遇到单独使用圈套器切除息肉有困难的情况;在这种情况下,内镜医师需要用力拉动圈套器。我们将此过程称为“强制 CSP(FCSP)”。然而,以前没有研究评估过这种方法。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察研究。从 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 6 月,我们在我院评估了 FCSP 的频率、安全性和有效性。我们将由助手单独使用圈套器进行的 CSP 与需要内镜医师用力拉动圈套器的 CSP 区分开来。

结果

在 1315 个切除的息肉中,有 105 个进行了 FCSP(8%)。两组的穿孔率均为 0%。进行该操作后 CSDP 的发生率为 FCSP 组 96.2%(101/105),常规 CSP 组 6.4%(77/1210)(<0.001)。FCSP 组 IPR 发生率为 12.5%(13/104),常规 CSP 组为 6.2%(75/1208)(=0.02)。多变量分析确定息肉位于盲肠(风险比 [RR],1.13;95%CI 1.050-1.179;=0.003)和直径≥6mm 的息肉(RR,2.37;95%CI 2.146-2.542;<0.001)是 FCSP 的独立危险因素。

结论

在这项研究中,对 105 个息肉(8%)进行了 FCSP。FCSP 可能与 CSDP 和 IPR 的发生有关。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的结果。

相似文献

1
Cold snare defect protrusion and incomplete polyp resection after forced cold snare polypectomy: a prospective observational study.冷圈套切除术后冷圈套缺陷突出和息肉不完全切除:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):14-21. doi: 10.1055/a-2183-5505. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
2
The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套切除术与热圈套切除术治疗结直肠小息肉内镜下切除的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 19;38(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2.
3
Characterization and significance of protrusions in the mucosal defect after cold snare polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术后黏膜缺损处突起的特征及意义
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
4
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
5
Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection after cold snare polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗后息肉不完全切除的危险因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Sep;34(9):1563-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03347-6. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm with a Hybrid Snare: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗 10-15mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性观察性初步研究。
Digestion. 2023;104(5):391-399. doi: 10.1159/000530642. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Does cold snare polypectomy completely resect the mucosal layer? A prospective single-center observational trial.冷圈套息肉切除术能否完全切除黏膜层?一项前瞻性单中心观察性试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;35(2):241-248. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14824. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial.冷圈套器与热圈套器息肉切除术治疗4-9毫米息肉的随机对照试验:完整息肉切除
Endoscopy. 2022 Oct;54(10):961-969. doi: 10.1055/a-1734-7952. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
10
Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):592-599. doi: 10.1111/den.13173. Epub 2018 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A method of "Noninjecting Resection using Bipolar Soft coagulation mode; NIRBS" for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor: a pilot study.一种用于浅表非壶腹十二指肠上皮肿瘤的“使用双极软凝模式的非注射切除;NIRBS”方法:一项初步研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03439-w.
2
A case of gastrointestinal perforation following transarterial embolization for an intramural hematoma after cold snare polypectomy of an adenoma in the transverse colon.一例横结肠腺瘤冷圈套息肉切除术后壁内血肿经动脉栓塞治疗后发生胃肠道穿孔的病例。
DEN Open. 2024 Sep 29;5(1):e70017. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70017. eCollection 2025 Apr.