Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061; Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5110566, Chile.
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Feb;107(2):870-882. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23810. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
Diet formulation in a pasture-based dairy system is a challenge as the quality and quantity of available pasture, which generally constitutes the base diet, is constantly changing. The objective of this paper is to cover a more in-depth review of the nutritional characteristics of pasture-based diets, identifying potential system, plant, and animal factors that condition pasture dietary inclusion in dairy cows. In practice, there is a wide diversity of pasture-based systems with predominant to minimal use of pasture requiring a more specific classification that potentially considers the amount and time of access to pasture, access to housing, length of grazing season, seasonality of calving, and level and method of supplementation. There are important differences in the nutritional quality between pasture species and even cultivars. However, under management practices that promote maintenance of pasture in a vegetative state as well as controlling the availability of pasture, it is possible to achieve high dry matter intakes (∼2.9%-3.4% of live weight) of pasture with moderate to high diet energy density, protein supply, and digestibility. The amount of pasture to include in the diet will depend on several factors, such as the type of production system, the cost of supplementary feeds, and the farmer's objectives, but inclusions of ∼40% to 50% of the diet seem to potentially reduce costs while apparently not limiting voluntary feed intake. Considering that there seems to be a continuum of intermediate management systems, a better understanding of the factors inherent to the feed ingredients used, as well as the use of nutrients by cows, and potential interactions between animal × system should be addressed in greater depth. This requires a meta-analysis approach, but given the diversity of the pasture-based system in practice, the existing information is highly fragmented. A clear definition of "subsystems" is necessary to direct the future research and development of mechanistic models.
基于牧场的奶牛饲养系统中,饲料配方是一个挑战,因为牧场的质量和数量(通常构成基础日粮)在不断变化。本文的目的是更深入地综述基于牧场的日粮的营养特性,并确定可能影响奶牛采食牧场日粮的系统、植物和动物因素。在实践中,基于牧场的系统存在广泛的多样性,从主要使用到最小限度使用牧场,需要更具体的分类,这可能需要考虑到牧场的利用时间和数量、是否有住房、放牧季节的长短、产犊季节性以及补充的水平和方式。不同的牧场物种甚至品种之间,在营养质量上存在重要差异。然而,在促进牧场保持生长状态以及控制牧场可利用性的管理实践下,有可能实现高干物质摄入量(约占活重的 2.9%-3.4%),同时保持中等至较高的日粮能量密度、蛋白质供应和消化率。日粮中包含的牧场量将取决于几个因素,例如生产系统的类型、补充饲料的成本以及农民的目标,但包含约 40%至 50%的日粮似乎可以降低成本,而不会明显限制自愿采食量。考虑到存在一系列中间管理系统,需要更深入地了解饲料成分中固有的因素、奶牛对营养物质的利用以及动物与系统之间的潜在相互作用。这需要采用荟萃分析方法,但鉴于实践中基于牧场的系统存在多样性,现有的信息高度分散。需要明确“子系统”的定义,以指导未来的机制模型研究和开发。