Management Sciences for Health, Arlington, VA, USA.
Credence Management Solutions, LLC, Supporting U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09893-8.
This document describes two qualitative programmatic case studies documenting experiences implementing digital financial services (DFS) for health with a focus on expanding access to universal health coverage (UHC). The CBHI 3MS system in Rwanda and the i-PUSH and Medical Credit Fund programs in Kenya were selected because they represent innovative use of digital financing technologies to support UHC programs at scale.
These studies were conducted from April-August 2021 as part of a broader digital financial services landscape assessment that used a mixed methods process evaluation to answer three questions: 1) what was the experience implementing the program, 2) how was it perceived to influence health systems performance, and 3) what was the client/beneficiary experience? Qualitative interviews involved a range of engaged stakeholders, including implementers, developers, and clients/users from the examined programs in both countries. Secondary data were used to describe key program trends.
Respondents agreed that DFS contributed to health system performance by making systems more responsive, enabling programs to implement changes to digital services based on new laws or client-proposed features, and improving access to quality data for better management and improved quality of services. Key informants and secondary data confirmed that both implementations likely contributed to increasing health insurance coverage; however, other changes in market dynamics were also likely to influence these changes. Program managers and some beneficiaries praised the utility of digital functions, compared to paper-based systems, and noted their effect on individual savings behavior to contribute to household resilience.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Several implementation considerations emerged as facilitators or barriers to successful implementation of DFS for health, including the importance of multisectoral investments in general ICT infrastructure, the value of leveraging existing community resources (CHWs and mobile money agents) to boost enrollment and help overcome the digital divide, and the significance of developing trust across government and private sector organizations. The studies led to the development of five main recommendations for the design and implementation of health programs incorporating DFS.
本文描述了两个定性的项目案例研究,记录了在普及健康覆盖(UHC)方面实施数字金融服务(DFS)的经验,重点是扩大获得健康的机会。卢旺达的 CBHI 3MS 系统和肯尼亚的 i-PUSH 和医疗信贷基金项目被选中,因为它们代表了创新使用数字融资技术来支持 UHC 计划的规模化。
这些研究是在 2021 年 4 月至 8 月期间进行的,作为数字金融服务全景评估的一部分,该评估采用混合方法进行过程评估,以回答三个问题:1)实施该计划的经验是什么,2)它如何被认为影响卫生系统绩效,3)客户/受益人体验如何?定性访谈涉及两国检查项目的一系列利益相关者,包括实施者、开发人员和客户/用户。二手数据用于描述关键计划趋势。
受访者一致认为,DFS 通过使系统更具响应性、使项目能够根据新法律或客户提出的功能对数字服务进行更改,以及改善获取高质量数据以进行更好的管理和提高服务质量,从而促进了卫生系统绩效。主要信息来源和二手数据证实,这两个实施项目都可能有助于提高健康保险的覆盖范围;然而,市场动态的其他变化也可能影响这些变化。项目管理人员和一些受益人称赞了数字功能的实用性,与纸质系统相比,并指出了它们对个人储蓄行为的影响,以促进家庭的韧性。
讨论/结论:出现了一些实施考虑因素,这些因素是 DFS 在健康方面成功实施的促进因素或障碍,包括对一般信息和通信技术基础设施的多部门投资的重要性、利用现有社区资源(CHWs 和移动货币代理)来提高注册率和帮助克服数字鸿沟的价值,以及在政府和私营部门组织之间建立信任的重要性。这些研究导致制定了五项关于纳入 DFS 的健康计划的设计和实施的主要建议。