• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

螺钉位置对斜向腰椎间融合联合前路固定患者 cage 下沉的影响。

The Influence of Screw Positioning on Cage Subsidence in Patients with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Fixation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Spine Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3263-3271. doi: 10.1111/os.13882. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1111/os.13882
PMID:37771126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10694007/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cage subsidence (CS) has been reported to be one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). To reduce the incidence of CS and improve intervertebral fusion rates, anterolateral fixation (AF) has been gradually proposed. However, the incidence of CS in patients with oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation (OLIF-AF) is still controversial. Additionally, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal placement of screws for OLIF-AF, and the impact of screw placement on the incidence of CS has yet to be thoroughly investigated and validated. The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between screw placements and CS and to establish an optimized approach for implantation in OLIF-AF.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. From October 2017 to December 2020, a total of 103 patients who received L4/5 OLIF-AF for lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis or degenerative instability in our department were followed up for more than 12 months. Demographic and radiographic data of these patients were collected. Additionally, screw placement related parameters, including trajectory and position, were measured by anterior-posterior X-ray and axial CT. Analysis was done by chi-square, independent t-test, univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression to explore the correlation between screw placements and CS. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of screw placement-related parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included, and CS was found in 28 (27.18%) patients. Univariable analysis was firstly performed for each parameter. Next, variables with p-value of <0.05, including bone mineral density (BMD), concave morphology, and screw placement-related parameters were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significant predictor factors for subsidence were coronal plane angle (CPA) (OR 0.580 ± 0.208, 95% CI 1.187-2.684), implantation point (IP) (L4) (OR 5.732 ± 2.737, 95% CI 1.445-12.166), and IP (L5) (OR 7.160 ± 3.480, 95% CI 1.405-28.683). Furthermore, ROC curves showed that the predictive accuracy of CS was 88.1% for CPA, 77.6% for IP (L4) and 80.9% for IP (L5).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that the trajectory of vertebral screws, including angle and position, was closely related to CS. Inserting screws parallel to each other and as close to the endplate as possible while keeping the cage inside the range of the superior and inferior screws are an optimal implantation strategy for OLIF-AF.

摘要

目的

cage 沉降(CS)是腰椎斜外侧融合术(OLIF)后最常见的并发症之一。为了降低 CS 的发生率和提高椎间融合率,已经逐渐提出了前外侧固定(AF)。然而,OLIF-AF 患者 CS 的发生率仍存在争议。此外,对于 OLIF-AF 的最佳螺钉放置位置尚无共识,并且螺钉放置对 CS 发生率的影响尚未得到充分研究和验证。本研究的目的是探讨螺钉放置与 CS 的相关性,并确定 OLIF-AF 中植入的优化方法。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究。2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 12 月,我科共对 103 例腰椎管狭窄症、腰椎滑脱症或退行性不稳定患者行 L4/5 OLIF-AF 治疗,随访时间超过 12 个月。收集这些患者的人口统计学和影像学数据。此外,通过前后位 X 线和轴向 CT 测量螺钉放置相关参数,包括轨迹和位置。采用卡方检验、独立 t 检验、单变量和多变量二项逻辑回归分析探讨螺钉放置与 CS 的相关性。最后,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估螺钉放置相关参数的预测能力。

结果

共纳入 103 例患者,其中 28 例(27.18%)发生 CS。首先对每个参数进行单变量分析。接下来,将 p 值<0.05 的变量,包括骨密度(BMD)、凹面形态和螺钉放置相关参数纳入多变量逻辑回归分析。CS 的显著预测因素为冠状面角度(CPA)(OR 0.580±0.208,95%CI 1.187-2.684)、植入点(IP)(L4)(OR 5.732±2.737,95%CI 1.445-12.166)和 IP(L5)(OR 7.160±3.480,95%CI 1.405-28.683)。此外,ROC 曲线显示 CPA 对 CS 的预测准确率为 88.1%,IP(L4)为 77.6%,IP(L5)为 80.9%。

结论

我们证明了椎体螺钉的轨迹,包括角度和位置,与 CS 密切相关。在保持 cage 在上下螺钉范围内的同时,使螺钉彼此平行并尽可能靠近终板插入,这是 OLIF-AF 的最佳植入策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/6135697af4ad/OS-15-3263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/dc5c65b6a426/OS-15-3263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/2e922b71bd20/OS-15-3263-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/a160dcdd77ae/OS-15-3263-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/5f705bd69382/OS-15-3263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/6135697af4ad/OS-15-3263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/dc5c65b6a426/OS-15-3263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/2e922b71bd20/OS-15-3263-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/a160dcdd77ae/OS-15-3263-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/5f705bd69382/OS-15-3263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba7d/10694007/6135697af4ad/OS-15-3263-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of Screw Positioning on Cage Subsidence in Patients with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Fixation.螺钉位置对斜向腰椎间融合联合前路固定患者 cage 下沉的影响。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3263-3271. doi: 10.1111/os.13882. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
2
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with stress end plate augmentation and anterolateral screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with osteoporosis: a matched-pair case-controlled study.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术联合应力终板强化及前外侧螺钉固定治疗伴骨质疏松的退变性腰椎管狭窄症:一项配对病例对照研究
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):523-532. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
3
[Analysis of the causes of cage subsidence after oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion].[斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉原因分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Jan 25;37(1):33-44. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20220378.
4
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation and stress endplate augmentation for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.斜向腰椎体间融合联合前路螺钉固定和应力终板增强治疗伴骨质疏松的退行性腰椎滑脱症。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3467-3475. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08401-8. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.微创斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术联合前外侧螺钉固定治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病
World Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;135:e671-e678. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.105. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
6
Biomechanical changes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion with different fixation techniques in degenerative spondylolisthesis lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.不同固定技术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的斜向腰椎间融合术后生物力学变化:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07796-1.
7
Can zoledronic acid reduce the risk of cage subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the elderly population? A retrospective study.唑来膦酸能否降低老年患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合联合双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术后 cage 沉降的风险?一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jun 8;19(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04828-3.
8
Computational comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion with various supplementary fixation systems: a finite element analysis.不同附加固定系统前路腰椎间融合术与斜外侧腰椎间融合术的计算比较:有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 2;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03480-z.
9
Whether Anterolateral Single Rod Can Maintain the Surgical Outcomes Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Double-Segment Disc Disease.前路单棒能否维持双节段椎间盘疾病后路斜外侧椎间融合术后的手术效果。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(6):1126-1134. doi: 10.1111/os.13290. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
Influence of coronal-morphology of endplate and intervertebral space to cage subsidence and fusion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.终板冠状形态和椎间隙对斜外侧腰椎间融合术后 cage 下沉和融合的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 4;23(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05584-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Augmenting Screw Technique to Prevent TLIF Cage Subsidence: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study.增强螺钉技术预防经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)融合器下沉:一项生物力学体外研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 24;12(4):337. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040337.
2
MRI-Based Cervical VBQ Scores as Predictors of Cage Subsidence in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.基于磁共振成像的颈椎VBQ评分作为颈椎手术中椎间融合器下沉的预测指标:一项荟萃分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 15:21925682251327381. doi: 10.1177/21925682251327381.
3
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined With Anterolateral Fixation and Cement Augmentation for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases in the Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Will the adjustment of insertional pedicle screw positions affect the risk of adjacent segment diseases biomechanically? An in-silico study.椎弓根螺钉植入位置的调整在生物力学上会影响相邻节段疾病的风险吗?一项计算机模拟研究。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 12;9:1004642. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004642. eCollection 2022.
2
Robot-assisted versus navigated transpedicular spine fusion: A comparative study.机器人辅助与导航经皮脊柱融合术:一项比较研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Apr;19(2):e2500. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2500. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
3
Endplate volumetric bone mineral density biomechanically matched interbody cage.
斜外侧腰椎椎间融合联合前外侧固定及骨水泥强化治疗老年退行性腰椎疾病:一项回顾性研究
Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):446-459. doi: 10.1111/os.14315. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
Risk factors and treatment strategies for adjacent segment disease following spinal fusion (Review).脊柱融合术后邻近节段病的危险因素和治疗策略(综述)。
Mol Med Rep. 2025 Feb;31(2). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13398. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
终板体积骨密度生物力学匹配椎间融合器。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Dec 6;10:1075574. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1075574. eCollection 2022.
4
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with stress end plate augmentation and anterolateral screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with osteoporosis: a matched-pair case-controlled study.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术联合应力终板强化及前外侧螺钉固定治疗伴骨质疏松的退变性腰椎管狭窄症:一项配对病例对照研究
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):523-532. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
5
Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study.逐步降低骨密度会增加斜向腰椎间融合患者中 cage 下沉的风险:一项基于计算机的研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06049-3.
6
Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.椎间孔斜向外侧融合术中的 cage 倾斜度与影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Nov 15;48(22):1611-1616. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004507. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
7
Influence of coronal-morphology of endplate and intervertebral space to cage subsidence and fusion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.终板冠状形态和椎间隙对斜外侧腰椎间融合术后 cage 下沉和融合的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 4;23(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05584-3.
8
Effect of the In Situ Screw Implantation Region and Angle on the Stability of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study.后路椎间融合术中置钉区域和角度对侧方腰椎间融合稳定性的影响:一项有限元研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1506-1517. doi: 10.1111/os.13312. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Preparation, characterization and evaluation of a new film based on chitosan, arginine and gold nanoparticle derivatives for wound-healing efficacy.基于壳聚糖、精氨酸和金纳米颗粒衍生物的新型薄膜的制备、表征及其伤口愈合功效评估
RSC Adv. 2020 Jun 2;10(35):20886-20899. doi: 10.1039/d0ra03704d. eCollection 2020 May 27.
10
Whether Anterolateral Single Rod Can Maintain the Surgical Outcomes Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Double-Segment Disc Disease.前路单棒能否维持双节段椎间盘疾病后路斜外侧椎间融合术后的手术效果。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(6):1126-1134. doi: 10.1111/os.13290. Epub 2022 Apr 28.