• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying and responding to family adversity in Australian community and primary health settings: a multi-site cross sectional study.在澳大利亚社区和基层医疗环境中识别和应对家庭逆境:一项多地点横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 13;11:1147721. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147721. eCollection 2023.
2
Integrated Child and Family Hub models for detecting and responding to family adversity: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation in two sites.综合儿童和家庭中心模型在检测和应对家庭逆境方面的作用:在两个地点进行混合方法评估的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e055431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055431.
3
Moving from idea to reality: The barriers and enablers to implementing Child and Family Hubs policy into practice in NSW, Australia.从理念到现实:澳大利亚新南威尔士州实施儿童和家庭中心政策的障碍和促进因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 15;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01164-0.
4
Do Australian policies enable a primary health care system to identify family adversity and subsequently support these families-A scoping study.澳大利亚政策能否使基层医疗体系识别家庭逆境,并为这些家庭提供后续支持?一项范围研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Feb;34(1):211-221. doi: 10.1002/hpja.684. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
6
Family Adversity and Resilience Measures in Pediatric Acute Care Settings.儿科急性护理环境中的家庭逆境与恢复力测量
Public Health Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;33(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/phn.12246.
7
Study protocol for the Healthier Wealthier Families (HWF) pilot randomised controlled trial: testing the feasibility of delivering financial counselling to families with young children who are identified as experiencing financial hardship by community-based nurses.健康富有家庭(HWF)试验性随机对照研究方案:由社区护士识别并确定经济困难的有幼儿的家庭,以测试为其提供理财咨询的可行性。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 21;11(5):e044488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044488.
8
Opening Pandora's box - key facilitators of practice change in detecting and responding to childhood adversity - a practitioner perspective.打开潘多拉的盒子 - 发现和应对儿童逆境方面实践变革的关键促进因素 - 从从业者的角度。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04918-5.
9
Child and caregiver mental health during 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: findings from national repeated cross-sectional surveys.澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间 12 个月内儿童和照顾者的心理健康:全国重复横断面调查的结果。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jul;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001390.
10
Perceptions of the care received from Australian palliative care services: A caregiver perspective.从照顾者的角度看待澳大利亚姑息治疗服务所提供的护理:认知。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Apr;16(2):198-208. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000177. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Justice Partnership: An Opportunity to Respond to Childhood Adversity.健康正义伙伴关系:应对儿童期逆境的契机。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):13. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8917. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Caregivers' experiences of being asked about adverse childhood experiences and receiving support from an integrated health and social care hub: a qualitative study.照顾者被问及童年不良经历并从综合健康与社会关怀中心获得支持的经历:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 5;15(2):e086710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086710.
3
Embedding Technology-Assisted Parenting Interventions in Real-World Settings to Empower Parents of Children With Adverse Childhood Experiences: Co-Design Study.将技术辅助的育儿干预措施嵌入现实环境中,以增强有不良童年经历的儿童的父母的能力:共同设计研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 22;8:e55639. doi: 10.2196/55639.
4
Moving from idea to reality: The barriers and enablers to implementing Child and Family Hubs policy into practice in NSW, Australia.从理念到现实:澳大利亚新南威尔士州实施儿童和家庭中心政策的障碍和促进因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 15;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01164-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional work of getting help: a qualitative analysis of caregiver-perceived barriers to responding to childhood adversity.寻求帮助的情感劳动:对照顾者应对儿童期逆境的感知障碍的定性分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2023 Oct;108(10):857-861. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325473. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Clinical Pathways for the Identification and Referral for Social Needs: A Systematic Review.社会需求识别与转诊的临床路径:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2023 Mar 1;151(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-056837.
3
The feasibility of a Child and Family Hub within Victorian Community Health Services: a qualitative study.维多利亚社区卫生服务中心设立儿童与家庭服务中心的可行性:一项定性研究
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Dec;46(6):784-793. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13292. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
4
Utility of screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in children and young people attending clinical and healthcare settings: a systematic review.筛查临床和医疗保健环境中儿童和青少年不良童年经历(ACE)的实用性:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 25;12(8):e060395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060395.
5
Transforming health settings to address gender-based violence in Australia.将卫生环境转变为解决澳大利亚基于性别的暴力行为。
Med J Aust. 2022 Aug 1;217(3):159-166. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51638. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
6
Do Integrated Hub Models of Care Improve Mental Health Outcomes for Children Experiencing Adversity? A Systematic Review.综合枢纽式照护模式能否改善遭遇逆境儿童的心理健康状况?一项系统综述。
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Jun 17;22(2):24. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6425. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
7
Integrated Child and Family Hub models for detecting and responding to family adversity: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation in two sites.综合儿童和家庭中心模型在检测和应对家庭逆境方面的作用:在两个地点进行混合方法评估的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e055431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055431.
8
Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences in Children: A Systematic Review.儿童期不良经历筛查:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2022 Feb 1;149(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051884.
9
Advancing Action on Health Equity Through a Sociolegal Model of Health.通过健康的社会法律模式推进卫生公平行动。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):904-927. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12539. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Trauma-Informed Care in Child Health Systems.儿童健康系统中的创伤知情护理。
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052579.

在澳大利亚社区和基层医疗环境中识别和应对家庭逆境:一项多地点横断面研究。

Identifying and responding to family adversity in Australian community and primary health settings: a multi-site cross sectional study.

机构信息

Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 13;11:1147721. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147721. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147721
PMID:37771827
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10525396/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unaddressed family adversity has potentially modifiable, negative biopsychosocial impacts across the life course. Little is known about how Australian health and social practitioners identify and respond to family adversity in community and primary health settings.

OBJECTIVE

To describe, in two Australian community health services: (1) the number of adversities experienced by caregivers, (2) practitioner identification of caregivers experiencing adversity, (3) practitioner response to caregivers experiencing adversity, and (4) caregiver uptake of referrals.

METHODS

Survey of caregivers of children aged 0-8 years attending community health services in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW). Analysis described frequencies of caregiver self-reported: (1) experiences of adversity, (2) practitioner identification of adversity, (3) practitioner response to adversity, and (4) referral uptake. Analyses were sub-grouped by three adversity domains and site.

RESULTS

349 caregivers (Victoria: = 234; NSW: = 115) completed the survey of whom 88% reported experiencing one or more family adversities. The median number of adversities was 4 (2-6). Only 43% of participants were directly asked about or discussed an adversity with a practitioner in the previous 6 months (Victoria: 30%; NSW: 68%). Among caregivers experiencing adversity, 30% received direct support (Victoria: 23%; NSW: 43%), and 14% received a referral (Victoria: 10%; NSW: 22%) for at least one adversity. Overall, 74% of caregivers accepted referrals when extended.

CONCLUSION

The needs of Australian families experiencing high rates of adversity are not systematically identified nor responded to in community health services. This leaves significant scope for reform and enhancement of service responses to families experiencing adversity.

摘要

背景

未解决的家庭逆境可能会对整个生命周期的生物心理社会产生潜在的可改变的负面影响。目前尚不清楚澳大利亚的卫生和社会从业人员如何在社区和初级卫生保健环境中识别和应对家庭逆境。

目的

描述在澳大利亚的两个社区卫生服务机构中:(1)照顾者经历的逆境数量,(2)从业人员识别经历逆境的照顾者,(3)从业人员对经历逆境的照顾者的反应,以及(4)照顾者接受转介的情况。

方法

对在维多利亚州和新南威尔士州(新州)的社区卫生服务机构中照顾 0-8 岁儿童的照顾者进行了调查。分析描述了照顾者自我报告的:(1)经历逆境的情况,(2)从业人员识别逆境的情况,(3)从业人员对逆境的反应情况,以及(4)转介接受情况。分析按三个逆境领域和地点进行了分组。

结果

349 名照顾者(维多利亚州:n=234;新州:n=115)完成了调查,其中 88%的人报告经历过一种或多种家庭逆境。逆境的中位数为 4(2-6)。在过去的 6 个月中,只有 43%的参与者直接向从业人员询问或讨论过逆境(维多利亚州:30%;新州:68%)。在经历逆境的照顾者中,30%(维多利亚州:23%;新州:43%)获得了直接支持,14%(维多利亚州:10%;新州:22%)获得了至少一项逆境的转介。总体而言,当提供转介时,有 74%的照顾者接受了转介。

结论

澳大利亚经历高逆境率的家庭的需求没有在社区卫生服务中得到系统的识别和回应。这为改革和加强对经历逆境的家庭的服务反应提供了很大的空间。