Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
International School of Public Health and One Health and The First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
J Med Virol. 2023 Oct;95(10):e29120. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29120.
The aim is to elucidate the relationship between sickle cell disorder and severe COVID-19. We systematically searched the required articles in three electronic databases, extracting and pooling effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from each eligible study to evaluate the effect of combined sickle cell disorder on adverse consequences in patients with COVID-19. This meta-analysis included 21 studies. Sickle cell disease (SCD) was a risk factor for mortality (pooled ES = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.00-2.92, p = 0.001), hospitalization (pooled ES = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.60-10.70, p = 0.000) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (pooled ES = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.61-3.24, p = 0.099) in COVID-19 patients. Patients with SCD had an increased risk of respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation, but a statistical association was not found (pooled ES = 1.21, 95%CI: 0.74-1.98, p = 0.036). There was significant heterogeneity between SCD and death, hospitalization, and respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation. The results of meta-regression of SCD and hospitalization suggested that the tested variables including Area (p = 0.642), study design (p = 0.739), sample size (p = 0.397), proportion of males (p = 0.708), effect type (p = 0.723), whether confounding factors are adjusted (p = 0.606) might not be the source of heterogeneity. In addition, sickle cell trait (SCT) was significantly associated with the mortality (pooled ES = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.28-1.85, p = 0.771) and hospitalization (pooled ES = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35,p = 0.519) in patients with COVID-19. But any increased risk of ICU admission/severe (pooled ES = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.95-1.62, p = 0.520) and mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.00, 95%CI:0.59-1.69) in COVID-19 patients with SCT was not observed. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were robust. The results of the funnel plot and Egger's test did not support the existence of publication bias. Current meta-analysis indicated that sickle cell disorder has a meaningful impact on COVID-19 progression to severe cases and associated deaths. However, further investigations and research to validate the current findings is indispensable.
目的是阐明镰状细胞病与严重 COVID-19 之间的关系。我们系统地在三个电子数据库中搜索了所需的文章,从每个合格的研究中提取和汇总效应大小(ES)和 95%置信区间(CI),以评估镰状细胞病综合对 COVID-19 患者不良后果的影响。这项荟萃分析包括 21 项研究。镰状细胞病(SCD)是 COVID-19 患者死亡(汇总 ES=1.70,95%CI:1.00-2.92,p=0.001)、住院(汇总 ES=6.21,95%CI:3.60-10.70,p=0.000)和入住重症监护病房(ICU)(汇总 ES=2.29,95%CI:1.61-3.24,p=0.099)的危险因素。SCD 患者发生呼吸衰竭/机械通气的风险增加,但未发现统计学关联(汇总 ES=1.21,95%CI:0.74-1.98,p=0.036)。SCD 与死亡、住院和呼吸衰竭/机械通气之间存在显著异质性。对 SCD 与住院进行荟萃回归分析的结果表明,测试的变量包括面积(p=0.642)、研究设计(p=0.739)、样本量(p=0.397)、男性比例(p=0.708)、效应类型(p=0.723)、是否调整混杂因素(p=0.606)可能不是异质性的来源。此外,镰状细胞特征(SCT)与 COVID-19 患者的死亡率(汇总 ES=1.54,95%CI:1.28-1.85,p=0.771)和住院率(汇总 ES=1.20,95%CI:1.07-1.35,p=0.519)显著相关。但 COVID-19 患者 ICU 入院/重症(汇总 ES=1.24,95%CI:0.95-1.62,p=0.520)和机械通气(OR=1.00,95%CI:0.59-1.69)的风险增加没有观察到。敏感性分析表明结果是稳健的。漏斗图和 Egger 检验的结果不支持存在发表偏倚。目前的荟萃分析表明,镰状细胞病对 COVID-19 向严重病例和相关死亡的进展有重要影响。然而,需要进一步的调查和研究来验证当前的发现。