Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 428 Church St., Room 3054 College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1065, USA.
Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Sep 29;31(10):601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08074-x.
The causes of variation in toxicity to the same treatment regimen among seemingly similar patients remain largely unknown. There was tremendous optimism that the patient's germline genome would be strongly predictive of treatment-related toxicity and could be used to personalize treatment and improve therapeutic outcomes. However, there has been limited success in discovering robust pharmacogenetic predictors of treatment-related toxicity and even less progress in translating the few validated predictors into clinical practice. It is apparent that identification of toxicity predictors that can be used to predict and prevent treatment-related toxicity will require thinking beyond germline genomics. To that end, we propose an integrated biomarker discovery approach that recognizes that a patient's toxicity risk is determined by the cumulative effects of a broad range of "omic" and non-omic factors. This commentary describes the limited success in discovering and translating clinical and pharmacogenetic toxicity predictors into clinical practice. We illustrate the evolution of cancer toxicity biomarker discovery and translation through studies of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy, which is one of the most common and debilitating side effects of cancer treatment. We then discuss the opportunities for discovering non-genomic (e.g., metabolomic, lipidomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, microbiomic, medical, behavioral, environmental) and integrated biomarkers that may be more strongly predictive of toxicity risk and the potential challenges with translating integrated biomarkers into clinical practice. This integrated biomarker discovery approach may circumvent some of the major limitations in toxicity biomarker science and move precision oncology treatment forward so that patients receive maximum treatment benefit with minimal toxicity.
在看似相似的患者中,相同治疗方案的毒性变化的原因在很大程度上仍然未知。人们曾强烈希望患者的种系基因组能够强烈预测与治疗相关的毒性,并可用于个性化治疗和改善治疗结果。然而,发现与治疗相关的毒性的强大遗传预测因子的成功率有限,将少数经过验证的预测因子转化为临床实践的进展则更少。显然,要确定可用于预测和预防与治疗相关的毒性的毒性预测因子,就需要超越种系基因组学的思维。为此,我们提出了一种综合生物标志物发现方法,该方法认识到患者的毒性风险是由广泛的“组学”和非组学因素的累积效应决定的。本文述评描述了发现和将临床和遗传毒性预测因子转化为临床实践的有限成功。我们通过紫杉醇诱导的周围神经病的研究来说明癌症毒性生物标志物发现和转化的演变,这是癌症治疗中最常见和最具致残性的副作用之一。然后,我们讨论了发现非基因组(例如代谢组学、脂质组学、转录组学、蛋白质组学、微生物组学、医学、行为学、环境)和综合生物标志物的机会,这些生物标志物可能更能预测毒性风险,以及将综合生物标志物转化为临床实践的潜在挑战。这种综合生物标志物发现方法可能会规避毒性生物标志物科学中的一些主要局限性,并推动精准肿瘤学治疗向前发展,从而使患者在最小毒性的情况下获得最大的治疗益处。