Fossouo Tagne Joel, Yakob Reginald Amin, Mcdonald Rachael, Wickramasinghe Nilmini
School of Health Sciences and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Health Analytics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Health Informatics, Melbourne, Australia.
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 29;7:e48976. doi: 10.2196/48976.
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are unintended and harmful events associated with medication use. Despite their significance in postmarketing surveillance, quality improvement, and drug safety research, ADRs are vastly underreported. Enhanced digital-based communication of ADR information to regulators and among care providers could significantly improve patient safety.
This paper presents a usability evaluation of the commercially available GuildCare Adverse Event Recording system, a web-based ADR reporting system widely used by community pharmacists (CPs) in Australia.
We developed a structured interview protocol encompassing remote observation, think-aloud moderating techniques, and retrospective questioning to gauge the overall user experience, complemented by the System Usability Scale (SUS) assessment. Thematic analysis was used to analyze field notes from the interviews.
A total of 7 CPs participated in the study, who perceived the system to have above-average usability (SUS score of 68.57). Nonetheless, the structured approach to usability testing unveiled specific functional and user interpretation issues, such as unnecessary information, lack of system clarity, and redundant data fields-critical insights not captured by the SUS results. Design elements like drop-down menus, free-text entry, checkboxes, and prefilled or auto-populated data fields were perceived as useful for enhancing system navigation and facilitating ADR reporting.
The user-centric design of technology solutions, like the one discussed herein, is crucial to meeting CPs' information needs and ensuring effective ADR reporting. Developers should adopt a structured approach to usability testing during the developmental phase to address identified issues comprehensively. Such a methodological approach may promote the adoption of ADR reporting systems by CPs and ultimately enhance patient safety.
药物不良反应(ADR)是与药物使用相关的意外且有害的事件。尽管其在上市后监测、质量改进和药物安全研究中具有重要意义,但药物不良反应的报告却严重不足。加强基于数字的药物不良反应信息向监管机构及医疗服务提供者之间的沟通,可显著提高患者安全性。
本文介绍了市售的GuildCare不良事件记录系统的可用性评估,该系统是澳大利亚社区药剂师广泛使用的基于网络的药物不良反应报告系统。
我们制定了一个结构化访谈方案,包括远程观察、出声思考调节技术和回顾性提问,以评估整体用户体验,并辅以系统可用性量表(SUS)评估。采用主题分析法分析访谈的现场记录。
共有7名社区药剂师参与了该研究,他们认为该系统的可用性高于平均水平(SUS评分为68.57)。尽管如此,可用性测试的结构化方法揭示了具体的功能和用户解读问题,如不必要的信息、系统不够清晰以及数据字段冗余等,而这些关键见解未被SUS结果所涵盖。诸如下拉菜单、自由文本输入、复选框以及预填充或自动填充的数据字段等设计元素,被认为有助于增强系统导航并促进药物不良反应报告。
本文所讨论的技术解决方案以用户为中心的设计,对于满足社区药剂师的信息需求以及确保有效的药物不良反应报告至关重要。开发者应在开发阶段采用结构化的可用性测试方法,以全面解决已发现的问题。这种方法可能会促进社区药剂师采用药物不良反应报告系统,并最终提高患者安全性。