• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上市后安全通讯以保护公众健康:澳大利亚、加拿大、欧盟和美国的监管政策比较。

Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health: A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL) Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1424-1442. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2010. Epub 2020 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.2010
PMID:32767557
Abstract

In the wake of the withdrawal of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug rofecoxib, regulators worldwide reconsidered their approach to postmarket safety. Many have since adopted a "life cycle" approach to regulation of medicines, facilitating faster approval of new medicines while planning for potential postmarket safety issues. A crucial aspect of postmarket safety is the effective and timely communication of emerging risk information using postmarket safety advisories, commonly issued as letters to healthcare professionals, drug safety bulletins, media alerts, and website announcements. Yet regulators differ in their use of postmarket safety advisories. We examined the capacity of regulators in the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia to warn about postmarket safety issues through safety advisories by assessing their governance, legislative authority, risk communication capabilities, and transparency.

摘要

在非甾体抗炎药罗非昔布撤回后,全球监管机构重新考虑了他们对上市后安全性的方法。此后,许多机构都采用了“生命周期”方法来管理药品,在规划潜在的上市后安全问题的同时,促进新药的快速批准。上市后安全性的一个关键方面是使用上市后安全性咨询有效地、及时地传递新出现的风险信息,这些咨询通常以致医疗保健专业人员的信、药物安全通报、媒体警报和网站公告的形式发布。然而,监管机构在使用上市后安全性咨询方面存在差异。我们通过评估美国、欧洲、加拿大和澳大利亚监管机构的治理、立法权、风险沟通能力和透明度,考察了它们通过安全咨询来警告上市后安全性问题的能力。

相似文献

1
Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health: A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States.上市后安全通讯以保护公众健康:澳大利亚、加拿大、欧盟和美国的监管政策比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1424-1442. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2010. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
2
Regulatory anticipation of postmarket safety problems for novel medicines approved by the EMA between 2001 and 2010: a cross-sectional study.2001年至2010年欧洲药品管理局批准的新型药物上市后安全问题的监管预期:一项横断面研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):687-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.3910. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
3
A descriptive analysis of medicines safety advisories issued by national medicines regulators in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States - 2007 to 2016.对澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国国家药品监管机构发布的药品安全警戒通告进行的描述性分析 - 2007 年至 2016 年。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1054-1063. doi: 10.1002/pds.5072. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Regulatory post-market drug safety advisories on cardiac harm: A comparison of four national regulatory agencies.监管后市场药物安全性通告中的心脏损害:四个国家监管机构的比较。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00680. doi: 10.1002/prp2.680.
5
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
6
Secret safety warnings on medicines: A case study of information access requests.药品安全警示信息公开:以信息获取请求为案例的研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):551-555. doi: 10.1002/pds.4762. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
7
US and European postmarket clinical data requirements.美国和欧洲上市后临床数据要求。
Med Device Technol. 2005 Mar;16(2):19-21.
8
Postmarket surveillance of natural health products in Canada: clinical and federal regulatory perspectives.加拿大天然健康产品的上市后监测:临床与联邦监管视角
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007 Sep;85(9):952-5. doi: 10.1139/Y07-085.
9
Provision of information on regulatory authorities' websites.在监管机构网站上提供信息。
Intern Med J. 2008 Jul;38(7):559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01588.x. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
10
US Food and Drug Administration regulatory reviewer disagreements and postmarket safety actions among new therapeutics.美国食品和药物管理局监管审查员对新疗法的分歧和上市后安全措施。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Jun;28(3):151-156. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112005. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety Warnings on the Same Harmful Effects of Medicines: A Comparison of Four National Regulators.药品相同有害效应的安全警示:四个国家监管机构的比较
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00573-y.
2
3D bioprinting for the construction of drug testing models-development strategies and regulatory concerns.用于构建药物测试模型的3D生物打印——发展策略与监管问题
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Feb 14;13:1457872. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1457872. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of Regulatory Post-Market Safety Advisories on Prescribing Practices: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
监管上市后安全建议对处方行为的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jun;117(6):1754-1762. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3614. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
4
Comparison of safety profiles for dapagliflozin based on EMA and FDA safety issues: Challenges and future of post-marketing surveillance in Korea.比较 dapagliflozin 在 EMA 和 FDA 安全性问题方面的安全性概况:韩国上市后监测的挑战和未来。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 22;19(11):e0314363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314363. eCollection 2024.
5
WHO-listed authorities (WLA) framework: transparent evidence-based approach for promoting regulatory reliance towards increased access to quality-assured medical products.世界卫生组织认可当局(WLA)框架:一种基于证据的透明方法,用于促进监管互认,以增加获得质量保证医疗产品的机会。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 23;11:1467229. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1467229. eCollection 2024.
6
Strategies to enhance risk communication about medicines in Malaysia: a Delphi study among multinational experts.马来西亚药品风险沟通策略:跨国专家德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11476-0.
7
The STAR Compass to Guide Future Pharmacovigilance Based on a 10-Year Review of the Strengthened EU System.基于强化欧盟系统 10 年回顾的未来药物警戒 STAR Compass 指南。
Drug Saf. 2024 Oct;47(10):941-956. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01451-3. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
8
A Web-Based Tool to Report Adverse Drug Reactions by Community Pharmacists in Australia: Usability Testing Study.澳大利亚社区药剂师报告药物不良反应的基于网络的工具:可用性测试研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 29;7:e48976. doi: 10.2196/48976.
9
Communicating for the Safe Use of Medicines: Progress and Directions for the 2020s Promoted by the Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance.促进安全用药沟通:国际药物警戒学会特别兴趣小组推动的2020年代进展与方向
Drug Saf. 2023 Jun;46(6):517-532. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01285-5. Epub 2023 May 23.
10
Characteristics of drug safety alerts issued by the Spanish Medicines Agency.西班牙药品管理局发布的药品安全警报特征。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 30;14:1090707. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1090707. eCollection 2023.