• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下复位固定治疗胫骨后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的临床疗效与骨折复位程度无关:一项回顾性研究。

The degree of fracture reduction does not compromise the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic reduction and fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e35356. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035356.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000035356
PMID:37773785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10545087/
Abstract

This study aimed to explore the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic internal fixation with repositioning sutures for the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures with poorly reduced fracture fragments. It was hypothesized that improperly repositioned fracture fragments might not influence the postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with PCL avulsion fractures treated by arthroscopic sutures. From January 2020 to December 2021, patients admitted to our hospital with PCL avulsion fractures were evaluated. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: diagnosis of PCL avulsion fracture as Meyers & McKeever Type II or Type III; underwent arthroscopic double tunnel suture fixation; and age below 70. Of the patients meeting these criteria, data from 34 individuals were collected by a designated follow-up officer. Based on postoperative imaging, the patients were divided into 2 groups: well fracture reduction and poor fracture reduction groups. Prior to the surgery, the Lysholm score, knee mobility, and international knee documentation committee (IKDC score) were recorded for both groups. At the 3-month post-surgery mark, CT-3D reconstruction was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted on the collected data. For data that conformed to a normal distribution, the t test was applied. For data that didn't conform, we used a non-parametric test. Both groups achieved successful wound healing without encountering any adverse events, such as fracture nonunion infection. Fracture healing was observed in both groups at the 3-month postoperative mark. The average follow-up duration was 13.24 ± 6.18 months. There were no significant differences in Lysholm score, IKDC score, or knee mobility between the well- and poorly-reduced groups at the final follow-up (P > .05). Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee function compared to the preoperative scores, with statistically significant differences observed in Lysholm score, IKDC score, and knee mobility (P < .05). Arthroscopic fixation with double-tunnel sutures proved to be a highly effective treatment approach for PCL avulsion fractures, even in cases where the fractures were poorly reduced. Remarkably, there were no significant differences observed in postoperative knee function between the well- and poorly-reduced groups, indicating that both groups achieved favorable outcomes.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨关节镜下复位缝线内固定治疗后交叉韧带(PCL)撕脱骨折中骨折块复位不良的患者的术后结果。假设对于关节镜缝线治疗的 PCL 撕脱骨折患者,骨折块未正确复位不会影响术后临床结果。2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,对我院收治的 PCL 撕脱骨折患者进行评估。纳入标准如下:Meyers 和 McKeever Ⅱ型或Ⅲ型 PCL 撕脱骨折诊断;接受关节镜双隧道缝线固定;年龄<70 岁。符合这些标准的患者中,由指定的随访人员收集了 34 名患者的数据。根据术后影像学结果,将患者分为两组:骨折复位良好组和骨折复位不良组。术前记录两组的 Lysholm 评分、膝关节活动度和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分。术后 3 个月行 CT-3D 重建。对收集的数据进行统计学分析。对于符合正态分布的数据,采用 t 检验。对于不符合正态分布的数据,采用非参数检验。两组均顺利愈合,无骨折不愈合、感染等不良事件发生。两组患者均在术后 3 个月观察到骨折愈合。平均随访时间为 13.24±6.18 个月。末次随访时,骨折复位良好组和骨折复位不良组的 Lysholm 评分、IKDC 评分和膝关节活动度差异均无统计学意义(P>.05)。术后两组膝关节功能均较术前改善,Lysholm 评分、IKDC 评分和膝关节活动度差异均有统计学意义(P<.05)。关节镜下双隧道缝线固定治疗 PCL 撕脱骨折疗效确切,即使骨折复位不良也能取得良好效果。两组术后膝关节功能差异无统计学意义,提示两组均取得了良好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/405ec50260bd/medi-102-e35356-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/2f1c4f7764db/medi-102-e35356-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/56734f707b5c/medi-102-e35356-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/405ec50260bd/medi-102-e35356-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/2f1c4f7764db/medi-102-e35356-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/56734f707b5c/medi-102-e35356-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90a/10545087/405ec50260bd/medi-102-e35356-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The degree of fracture reduction does not compromise the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic reduction and fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: A retrospective study.关节镜下复位固定治疗胫骨后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的临床疗效与骨折复位程度无关:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e35356. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035356.
2
[Arthroscopic suspension fixation with Endobutton in treatment of tibial insertion avulsion fractures of posterior cruciate ligament].关节镜下Endobutton悬吊固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):267-271. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202401028.
3
Arthroscopic Direct Anterior-to-Posterior Suture Suspension Fixation for the Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fracture.关节镜下前向后缝悬吊固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2031-2041. doi: 10.1111/os.13401. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
[Early effectiveness of minimally invasive open reduction and internal fixation versus arthroscopic double-tunnel suture fixation for tibial avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament].微创切开复位内固定与关节镜下双隧道缝线固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的早期疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 15;34(6):707-712. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201911049.
5
Treatment of tibia avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament with total arthroscopic internal fixation with adjustable double loop plate: A retrospective cohort study.关节镜下可调双环板内固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折:回顾性队列研究。
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):2233-2240. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic high-intensity suture binding combined with button plate suspension fixation in the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures.关节镜下高强度缝线捆扎结合纽扣钢板悬吊固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的临床疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 29;19(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04943-1.
7
[A comparative study of absorbable screw fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation in treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament at tibial insertion of knee joint].可吸收螺钉固定与可吸收螺钉联合缝线锚钉固定治疗膝关节后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May 15;37(5):572-577. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202301061.
8
Modified arthroscopic repair of a posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture improves IKDC and Lysholm score compared to open reduction.与切开复位相比,改良关节镜下后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折修复术可改善 IKDC 和 Lysholm 评分。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jun 18;19(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04851-4.
9
Clinical outcomes of acute displaced posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture: A retrospective comparative study between the arthroscopic suture and EndoButton fixation techniques.急性移位性后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的临床疗效:关节镜下缝合与 EndoButton 固定技术的回顾性对比研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Apr;107(2):102798. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102798. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
10
[Comparison of early effectiveness of arthroscopic suture bridge technique and conventional double tunnel suture technique in treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament insertion].关节镜下缝线桥技术与传统双隧道缝线技术治疗后交叉韧带止点撕脱骨折的早期疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 15;35(7):829-835. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202102080.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroscopic Repair of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures Using a "Y"-Shaped Suture Technique Combined With Suspension Fixation.采用“Y”形缝合技术联合悬吊固定进行关节镜下后交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折修复术
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 May 20;14(7):103572. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103572. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Impact of screw design on refixation of solid avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament-A biomechanical feasibility study.螺钉设计对后交叉韧带实心撕脱骨折重新固定的影响——一项生物力学可行性研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 31;12(2):e70225. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70225. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Good clinical and radiological results following remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.保留残端的后交叉韧带重建术后的良好临床和影像学结果:一项系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jun;31(6):2418-2432. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07192-z. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
2
Arthroscopic Direct Anterior-to-Posterior Suture Suspension Fixation for the Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fracture.关节镜下前向后缝悬吊固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2031-2041. doi: 10.1111/os.13401. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
3
Treatment of tibia avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament with total arthroscopic internal fixation with adjustable double loop plate: A retrospective cohort study.
Comparison of three surgical methods for displaced posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion avulsion fractures: a retrospective study.
三种手术方法治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的比较:一项回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 1;20(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05703-5.
4
Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic high-intensity suture binding combined with button plate suspension fixation in the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures.关节镜下高强度缝线捆扎结合纽扣钢板悬吊固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的临床疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 29;19(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04943-1.
关节镜下可调双环板内固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折:回顾性队列研究。
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):2233-2240. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Dual Tibial Tunnel Double Sutures Knot-bump Fixation Technique for Acute Displaced Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures.关节镜下双胫骨隧道双缝线结瘤固定技术治疗急性移位后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的临床及影像学结果
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jan;9(1):50-57. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.47089.2300.
5
Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture Using an Adjustable-Length Loop Device.使用可调节长度环装置对后交叉韧带撕脱骨折进行关节镜下复位及内固定
Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Dec 21;9(12):e2001-e2006. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.08.028. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Arthroscopic Fixation Technique for Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament From the Tibia.胫骨后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的关节镜固定技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Oct 23;9(11):e1819-e1824. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.08.006. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion avulsion, management by open reduction and internal fixation using plate and screws through a direct posterior approach.后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折,采用经后内侧直接入路切开复位钢板螺钉内固定治疗。
Injury. 2021 Mar;52(3):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.058. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to elucidate the difference for tibial side PCL avulsion fixation: a randomized controlled trial (RCT).关节镜下复位内固定(ARIF)与切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗胫骨后交叉韧带止点撕脱骨折的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验(RCT)。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1251-1257. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06144-9. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
9
Clinical experience with arthroscopic suture pull technique in isolated PCL avulsion injuries.关节镜下缝线牵拉技术治疗单纯后交叉韧带撕脱伤的临床经验
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 May;11(Suppl 3):S362-S367. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
[All-arthroscopic fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures with a suture-button technique].[关节镜下采用缝线纽扣技术全关节镜固定胫骨后交叉韧带撕脱骨折]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Jun;32(3):236-247. doi: 10.1007/s00064-019-00626-x. Epub 2019 Sep 6.