Suppr超能文献

西班牙≥65 岁急诊就诊患者家庭类型对一年预后的影响。EDEN-6 研究。

Influence of type of household on prognosis at one year in patients ≥65 years attending hospital emergency departments in Spain. The EDEN-6 study.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

Área de Urgencias, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2023 Dec;178:107852. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107852. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the type of household is associated with prognosis at one year in patients ≥65 years of age discharged after medical consultation requiring emergency department care.

METHODS

Data from the Emergency Department and Elder Needs (EDEN) cohort were used. This retrospective cohort included all patients ≥65 years of age seen in 52 Spanish emergency departments over one week (April 1-7, 2019) in whom the type of household was recorded and categorized as living at home alone, with relatives, with professional caregivers, or in a nursing home. Patient demographic and other baseline characteristics and management during the index emergency department episode were recorded and used to adjust the following 1-year outcomes: all-cause mortality, hospitalization and emergency department revisit. Associations between type of household and outcomes are expressed as adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals using living alone as the reference category.

RESULTS

13,442 patients with a median age of 79 years (interquartile range 72-86) were included; 56% were women, 12.2% of patients lived alone, 74.9% with relatives, 3.9% with a professional caregiver, and 9.1% in a nursing home. During the year following discharge, the mortality rate was 14.0%, the hospitalization rate 29.7%, and the emergency department revisit rate 59.3%. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of death was associated only with living in a nursing home (hazard ratio 1.366 (1.101-1.695)). On the other hand, the risk of hospitalization was lower in individuals living in nursing homes (hazard ratio 0.783 [0.676-0.907]) and at home with relatives (hazard ratio 0.897 [0.810-0.992]), while the risk of emergency department revisit was lower in individuals living in nursing homes (hazard ratio 0.826 [0.742-0.920]) or at home with caregivers (hazard ratio 0.856 [0.750-0.976]).

CONCLUSION

The type of household was modestly associated with the one-year prognosis of patients ≥65 years of age discharged after attendance at an emergency department. Living in a nursing home is associated with an increased risk of death but a decreased risk of rehospitalization or emergency department revisit, while living at home with relatives or professional caregivers is associated only with a decreased risk of hospitalization and emergency department revisit, respectively.

摘要

目的

探讨在需要急诊就诊的 65 岁以上患者中,家庭类型与一年预后是否相关。

方法

使用急诊科和老年人需求(EDEN)队列的数据。该回顾性队列包括在 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 7 日一周内在西班牙 52 个急诊科就诊的所有年龄≥65 岁的患者,记录了家庭类型并分为独居、与亲属同住、有专业护理人员或住在养老院。记录患者的人口统计学和其他基线特征以及指数急诊科就诊期间的治疗情况,并用于调整以下 1 年的结局:全因死亡率、住院和急诊科再就诊。家庭类型与结局的相关性用独居为参考类别表达为调整后的风险比及其 95%置信区间。

结果

纳入了 13442 名中位年龄为 79 岁(四分位间距 72-86)的患者;56%为女性,12.2%的患者独居,74.9%与亲属同住,3.9%有专业护理人员,9.1%住在养老院。出院后 1 年内,死亡率为 14.0%,住院率为 29.7%,急诊科再就诊率为 59.3%。在完全调整的模型中,死亡风险仅与住在养老院相关(风险比 1.366(1.101-1.695))。另一方面,与住在养老院(风险比 0.783(0.676-0.907))和与亲属同住(风险比 0.897(0.810-0.992))的患者相比,住院风险较低,而与住在养老院(风险比 0.826(0.742-0.920))或与护理人员同住(风险比 0.856(0.750-0.976))的患者相比,急诊科再就诊风险较低。

结论

家庭类型与 65 岁以上患者急诊就诊后的一年预后有一定相关性。住在养老院与死亡风险增加相关,但再住院或急诊科再就诊风险降低,而与亲属或专业护理人员同住仅与住院和急诊科再就诊风险降低相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验