Counselor Education Department, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
Department of Pediatrics, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2941-e2951. doi: 10.1055/a-2183-9013. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
This study aimed to better understand the interpersonal influences on a pregnant individual's decision of how to treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy using a qualitative approach.
A semistructured interview guide was developed to assess pregnancy symptoms, decision-making regarding treating nausea, and interpersonal influences on treatment decisions. Interviews were conducted with 17 individuals enrolled in a neuroimaging and behavioral study of prenatal exposure to cannabis who used medication and/or cannabis to treat symptoms associated with pregnancy.
Interviews revealed four groups of stakeholders who influenced participant decision-making: medical providers, partners, family, and friends. Influence was categorized as either positive, negative, neutral, or absent (if not discussed or participant chose not to disclose). Those in the medication group reported only positive or neutral feedback from friends, family, partners, and providers. In contrast, the cannabis group participants reported positive feedback from friends, mixed feedback from family and partners, and negative feedback from providers, which was often felt to be stigmatizing. Many in the cannabis group also reported varying feedback from different medical providers. While the cannabis group frequently reported eliciting feedback from friends, family, and partners, the medication group often did not.
Medication group participants reported entirely positive feedback from providers and often did not mention any feedback at all from partners, family, and friends. Cannabis group participants reported much more varied feedback, both positive and negative, from a variety of interpersonal contacts and sometimes decided to conceal their treatment choice after receiving or fearing negative feedback. We recommend further research into the health outcomes of pregnant patients who chose not to discuss their treatment decisions with providers, family, partners, or friends. We also suggest further study of possible reasons behind a lack of disclosure, including fear of stigma and/or legal consequences.
· Providers, partners, family, friends gave feedback.. · Medication group got positive feedback.. · Cannabis group stigmatized by providers.. · Cannabis group got mixed feedback..
本研究旨在通过定性方法更好地了解人际因素对孕妇个体如何治疗孕期恶心和呕吐的决策的影响。
制定了半结构式访谈指南,以评估妊娠症状、治疗恶心的决策以及对治疗决策的人际影响。对 17 名参加产前接触大麻的神经影像学和行为研究的个体进行了访谈,这些个体使用药物和/或大麻来治疗与妊娠相关的症状。
访谈揭示了影响参与者决策的四组利益相关者:医疗保健提供者、伴侣、家人和朋友。影响分为积极、消极、中立或不存在(如果未讨论或参与者选择不披露)。药物组的参与者报告来自朋友、家人、伴侣和提供者的只有积极或中立的反馈。相比之下,大麻组的参与者报告来自朋友的积极反馈、来自家人和伴侣的混合反馈以及来自提供者的消极反馈,这常常被认为是污名化的。大麻组的许多参与者还报告了不同医疗提供者的不同反馈。虽然大麻组经常报告从朋友、家人和伴侣那里获得反馈,但药物组通常没有。
药物组的参与者报告来自提供者的完全积极的反馈,并且经常根本没有提到来自伴侣、家人和朋友的任何反馈。大麻组的参与者报告了更多不同的反馈,既有积极的也有消极的,来自各种人际关系,有时在收到或担心负面反馈后决定隐瞒他们的治疗选择。我们建议进一步研究选择不与提供者、家人、伴侣或朋友讨论治疗决策的孕妇患者的健康结果。我们还建议进一步研究缺乏披露的可能原因,包括对污名化和/或法律后果的恐惧。
·提供者、伴侣、家人、朋友提供反馈。·药物组获得积极反馈。·提供者污名化大麻组。·大麻组获得混合反馈。