From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Zehir).
the Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Nardi).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024 Feb 1;148(2):139-148. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0322-CP.
CONTEXT.—: The Sustainable Predictive Oncology Therapeutics and Diagnostics quality assurance pilot study (SPOT/Dx pilot) on molecular oncology next-generation sequencing (NGS) reportedly demonstrated performance limitations of NGS laboratory-developed tests, including discrepancies with a US Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic. The SPOT/Dx pilot methods differ from those used in proficiency testing (PT) programs.
OBJECTIVE.—: To reanalyze SPOT/Dx pilot data using PT program methods and compare to PT program data.Also see p. 136.
DESIGN.—: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Molecular Oncology Committee reanalyzed SPOT/Dx pilot data applying PT program methods, adjusting for confounding conditions, and compared them to CAP NGS PT program performance (2019-2022).
RESULTS.—: Overall detection rates of KRAS and NRAS single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and multinucleotide variants (MNVs) by SPOT/Dx pilot laboratories were 96.8% (716 of 740) and 81.1% (129 of 159), respectively. In CAP PT programs, the overall detection rates for the same SNVs and MNVs were 97.2% (2671 of 2748) and 91.8% (1853 of 2019), respectively. In 2022, the overall detection rate for 5 KRAS and NRAS MNVs in CAP PT programs was 97.3% (1161 of 1193).
CONCLUSIONS.—: CAP PT program data demonstrate that laboratories consistently have high detection rates for KRAS and NRAS variants. The SPOT/Dx pilot has multiple design and analytic differences with established PT programs. Reanalyzed pilot data that adjust for confounding conditions demonstrate that laboratories proficiently detect SNVs and less successfully detect rare to never-observed MNVs. The SPOT/Dx pilot results are not generalizable to all molecular oncology testing and should not be used to market products or change policy affecting all molecular oncology testing.
据报道,可持续预测肿瘤治疗学和诊断学质量保证试点研究(SPOT/Dx 试点)在分子肿瘤下一代测序(NGS)方面显示出实验室开发测试的性能局限性,包括与美国食品和药物管理局批准的伴随诊断不一致。SPOT/Dx 试点的方法与能力验证(PT)计划中的方法不同。
使用 PT 计划方法重新分析 SPOT/Dx 试点数据,并与 PT 计划数据进行比较。另见第 136 页。
美国病理学家学会(CAP)分子肿瘤委员会应用 PT 计划方法重新分析 SPOT/Dx 试点数据,调整混杂条件,并将其与 CAP NGS PT 计划性能(2019-2022 年)进行比较。
SPOT/Dx 试点实验室检测 KRAS 和 NRAS 单核苷酸变异(SNV)和多核苷酸变异(MNV)的总检出率分别为 96.8%(716/740)和 81.1%(129/159)。在 CAP PT 计划中,相同 SNV 和 MNV 的总检出率分别为 97.2%(2671/2748)和 91.8%(1853/2019)。在 2022 年,CAP PT 计划中 5 个 KRAS 和 NRAS MNV 的总检出率为 97.3%(1161/1193)。
CAP PT 计划数据表明,实验室对 KRAS 和 NRAS 变异的检测率始终很高。SPOT/Dx 试点与成熟的 PT 计划有多个设计和分析差异。对调整混杂条件的重新分析试点数据表明,实验室熟练地检测 SNV,而较少成功地检测罕见或从未观察到的 MNV。SPOT/Dx 试点结果不能推广到所有分子肿瘤学检测,不应用于推广产品或改变影响所有分子肿瘤学检测的政策。