• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衰老过程中的情景性和语义性预感:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Episodic and semantic feeling-of-knowing in aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

LPNC, CNRS, UMR 5105, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, NeuroSpin Center, Institute for Life Sciences Frédéric Joliot, Fundamental Research Division, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université, Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 30;13(1):16439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36251-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-36251-9
PMID:37777585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10542372/
Abstract

A complex pattern of preservation and deterioration in metacognition in aging is found, especially regarding predicting future memory retrieval (i.e., feeling-of-knowing, FOK). While semantic FOK (sFOK) is preserved with age, studies on episodic tasks (eFOK) produce equivocal findings. We present a meta-analysis of 20 studies on eFOK and sFOK, analyzing the difference in metacognitive sensitivity between 922 younger and 966 older adults, taking into account the difference in memory performance. The sFOK studies yielded no overall age effect (8 effects, g = -0.10 [-0.29, 0.10]). However, we found a reliable age-group difference on eFOK (22 effects, g = 0.53 [0.28, 0.78]), which was moderated when considering recognition performance. Moreover, using aggregated data of 134 young and 235 older adults from published and unpublished studies from our lab, we investigated memory performance as an explanation of the eFOK deficit. We show that older adults are less metacognitively sensitive than younger adults for eFOKs which is, at least partly, due to the age-related memory decline. We highlight two non-exclusive explanations: a recollection deficit at play in the first and second order tasks, and a confound between first order performance and the measure used to assess metacognitive sensitivity.

摘要

在衰老过程中,元认知的保存和恶化呈现出复杂的模式,特别是在预测未来记忆检索方面(即感觉知道,FOK)。虽然语义 FOK(sFOK)随年龄而保持,但在情节任务(eFOK)上的研究得出了模棱两可的发现。我们对 20 项关于 eFOK 和 sFOK 的研究进行了荟萃分析,分析了 922 名年轻成年人和 966 名年长成年人之间元认知敏感性的差异,同时考虑了记忆表现的差异。sFOK 研究没有产生总体年龄效应(8 个效应,g=-0.10[-0.29,0.10])。然而,我们在 eFOK 上发现了可靠的年龄组差异(22 个效应,g=0.53[0.28,0.78]),当考虑到识别表现时,这种差异会受到调节。此外,我们使用来自我们实验室已发表和未发表的研究的 134 名年轻成年人和 235 名年长成年人的汇总数据,调查了记忆表现作为解释 eFOK 缺陷的原因。我们表明,年长成年人在 eFOK 方面的元认知敏感性不如年轻成年人,这至少部分归因于与年龄相关的记忆衰退。我们强调了两个非排他性的解释:在第一和第二级任务中起作用的回忆缺陷,以及第一级表现和用于评估元认知敏感性的测量之间的混淆。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/be71afc148b5/41598_2023_36251_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/354e301b3a9d/41598_2023_36251_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/6642e4ac0288/41598_2023_36251_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/ff1c51df27af/41598_2023_36251_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/d65751721889/41598_2023_36251_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/7a9b406a8e0c/41598_2023_36251_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/9da32349d32b/41598_2023_36251_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/e1337dab4a67/41598_2023_36251_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/be71afc148b5/41598_2023_36251_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/354e301b3a9d/41598_2023_36251_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/6642e4ac0288/41598_2023_36251_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/ff1c51df27af/41598_2023_36251_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/d65751721889/41598_2023_36251_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/7a9b406a8e0c/41598_2023_36251_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/9da32349d32b/41598_2023_36251_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/e1337dab4a67/41598_2023_36251_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/10542372/be71afc148b5/41598_2023_36251_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Episodic and semantic feeling-of-knowing in aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.衰老过程中的情景性和语义性预感:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 30;13(1):16439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36251-9.
2
Diminished episodic memory awareness in older adults: evidence from feeling-of-knowing and recollection.老年人情景记忆意识减退:来自知晓感和回忆的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Dec;16(4):769-84. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
3
Selective deficits in episodic feeling of knowing in ageing: a novel use of the general knowledge task.衰老过程中情景性知晓感的选择性缺陷:常识任务的一种新应用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
4
Effects of aging and divided attention on episodic feeling-of-knowing accuracy.衰老及注意力分散对情景性知晓感准确性的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
Activating Aging Stereotypes Increases Source Recollection Confusions in Older Adults: Effect at Encoding but Not Retrieval.激活老化刻板印象会增加老年人来源记忆混淆:在编码时起作用,但在提取时不起作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Apr 12;74(4):633-641. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx103.
6
Metamemory in children with autism: exploring "feeling-of-knowing" in episodic and semantic memory.自闭症儿童的元记忆:探索情节记忆和语义记忆中的“知晓感”。
Neuropsychology. 2013 Jan;27(1):19-27. doi: 10.1037/a0030526. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
7
Age invariance in semantic and episodic metamemory: both younger and older adults provide accurate feeling-of-knowing for names of faces.语义和情节记忆的年龄不变性:年轻和老年成年人都能准确地对人脸的名字产生熟悉感。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2014;21(1):27-51. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2013.775217. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
8
Knowing more than we know: metacognition, semantic fluency, and originality in younger and older adults.了解比我们已知更多的知识:年轻人和老年人的元认知、语义流畅性与原创性。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Jan-Mar;31(2):279-300. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2022.2149691. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
Comparing event-related potentials of retrospective and prospective metacognitive judgments during episodic and semantic memory.比较情景记忆和语义记忆中回溯和前瞻元认知判断的事件相关电位。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 2;13(1):1949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28595-z.
10
Neural correlates of metacognitive monitoring during episodic and semantic retrieval.在情景和语义检索期间的元认知监测的神经相关物。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Sep;12(3):599-609. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0096-8.

引用本文的文献

1
On the complexity of metacognitive judgments of memory: evidence from retrospective confidence, feeling of knowing, and older adults.论记忆元认知判断的复杂性:来自回顾性信心、知晓感及老年人的证据
Neurosci Conscious. 2025 Feb 24;2025(1):niaf003. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaf003. eCollection 2025.
2
CpG Methylation of Receptor Activator NF-κB (RANK) Gene Promoter Region Delineates Senescence-Related Decrease of RANK Gene Expression.核因子κB受体激活剂(RANK)基因启动子区域的CpG甲基化描绘了与衰老相关的RANK基因表达下降。
Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2024 Aug 29;57(4):137-147. doi: 10.1267/ahc.24-00034. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-related decreases in global metacognition are independent of local metacognition and task performance.年龄相关的全局元认知下降与局部元认知和任务表现无关。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105389. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105389. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
Measuring metacognitive performance: type 1 performance dependence and test-retest reliability.测量元认知表现:1型表现依赖性与重测信度。
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Nov 25;2021(1):niab040. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab040. eCollection 2021.
3
How Local and Global Metacognition Shape Mental Health.
本地和全球元认知如何塑造心理健康。
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 1;90(7):436-446. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of metacognitive abilities in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.精神分裂谱系障碍个体元认知能力的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jul;126:329-337. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
5
Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.元认知是否存在 G 因素?跨任务回溯性元认知敏感性的相关性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Sep;149(9):1788-1799. doi: 10.1037/xge0000746. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
Metacognitive domain specificity in feeling-of-knowing but not retrospective confidence.知晓感中的元认知领域特异性,但回顾性信心不存在此特异性。
Neurosci Conscious. 2020 Feb 24;2020(1):niaa001. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaa001. eCollection 2020.
7
Abnormalities of confidence in psychiatry: an overview and future perspectives.精神病学中信心的异常:概述及未来展望。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 21;9(1):268. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0602-7.
8
Erratum: How experimental procedures influence estimates of metacognitive ability.勘误:实验程序如何影响元认知能力的估计。
Neurosci Conscious. 2019 Jul 15;2019(1):niz010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niz010. eCollection 2019.
9
Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.通过自适应训练提高元认知能力的领域泛化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):51-64. doi: 10.1037/xge0000505.
10
Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements.思考思维:基于坐标的元认知判断神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Nov 13;2:2398212818810591. doi: 10.1177/2398212818810591. eCollection 2018.