Suppr超能文献

编辑关于在学术期刊出版中负责任使用生成式人工智能技术的声明。

Editors' Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.

作者信息

Kaebnick Gregory E, Magnus David Christopher, Kao Audiey, Hosseini Mohammad, Resnik David, Dubljević Veljko, Rentmeester Christy, Gordijn Bert, Cherry Mark J, Maschke Karen J, McMillan John, Rasmussen Lisa M, Haupt Laura, Schüklenk Udo, Chadwick Ruth, Diniz Debora

机构信息

Editor of the Hastings Center Report.

Editor in chief of the American Journal of Bioethics.

出版信息

Ethics Hum Res. 2023 Sep-Oct;45(5):39-43. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500182.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat to the goals that animate our work but could also be valuable for achieving those goals. In the interests of fostering a wider conversation about how generative AI may be used, we have developed a preliminary set of recommendations for its use in scholarly publishing. We hope that the recommendations and rationales set out here will help the scholarly community navigate toward a deeper understanding of the strengths, limits, and challenges of AI for responsible scholarly work.

摘要

生成式人工智能(AI)有潜力改变学术出版的许多方面。作者、同行评审人员和编辑可能会以多种方式使用AI,这些用途可能会增强他们现有的工作,也可能旨在取而代之。我们是生物伦理学和人文学科期刊的编辑,一直在思考这一持续变革的影响。我们认为,生成式AI可能对推动我们工作的目标构成威胁,但也可能对实现这些目标有价值。为了促进关于如何使用生成式AI的更广泛讨论,我们制定了一套关于其在学术出版中使用的初步建议。我们希望这里列出的建议和理由将有助于学术界更深入地理解AI在负责任的学术工作中的优势、局限性和挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验