The Hastings Center.
Stanford University.
AJOB Neurosci. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):337-340. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2257181. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat to the goals that animate our work but could also be valuable for achieving those goals. In the interests of fostering a wider conversation about how generative AI may be used, we have developed a preliminary set of recommendations for its use in scholarly publishing. We hope that the recommendations and rationales set out here will help the scholarly community navigate toward a deeper understanding of the strengths, limits, and challenges of AI for responsible scholarly work.
生成式人工智能(AI)有可能改变学术出版的许多方面。作者、同行评审员和编辑可能会以各种方式使用 AI,这些用途可能会增强他们现有的工作,也可能旨在取代他们的工作。我们是生物伦理学和人文学科期刊的编辑,一直在思考这种持续转变的影响。我们认为,生成式 AI 可能对推动我们工作的目标构成威胁,但也可能对实现这些目标具有价值。为了促进更广泛地讨论生成式 AI 的使用方式,我们为其在学术出版中的使用制定了一套初步建议。我们希望这里提出的建议和理由能帮助学术界更深入地了解 AI 在负责任的学术工作中的优势、限制和挑战。