Suppr超能文献

画钟测验和立方体临摹测验快速筛查痴呆:结合简易精神状态检查评分。

Clock-drawing Test and Cube-copying Test to Quickly Screen Dementia: In Combination with the Mini-mental State Examination Scores.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yowa Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2024 May 1;63(9):1223-1228. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2579-23. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

Abstract

Objective Due to the increasing elderly population and number of dementia patients, the current number of psychiatrists and neurologists remains insufficient to treat dementia in Japan. Therefore, a simple method for accurately performing a dementia diagnosis, including that of primary care physicians, is sought in clinical practice. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients who made their first visit due to amnesia between October 2020 and October 2022. The sensitivities and specificities of four spatial recognition and planning ability evaluation methods [fox finger imitation test, pentagon-copying test (PCT), cube-copying test (CCT), and clock-drawing test (CDT)] were calculated. The difference between the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, as an evaluation of memory and language impairment, and CDT scores were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Patients Fifty-one patients with dementia and 6 patients without dementia were examined in this study. Results The sensitivity and specificity were 31.4% and 100% for the fox finger imitation tests, 29.4% and 100% for PCT, 62% and 83.3% for CCT, and 72.5% and 100% for CDT, respectively. The sensitivity increased to 78.4% when the CCT and CDT results were combined. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the MMSE and CDT scores of the 51 patients with dementia showed a significantly positive correlation (r=0.62, p<0.001). Comparing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), the difference between the MMSE and CDT scores was significantly greater in patients with DLB. Conclusion To quickly screen for dementia, a combination of CCT and CDT is recommended for the highest sensitivity (78.4%). In addition, the difference between the CDT and MMSE scores is considered to be useful for differentiating DLB from AD.

摘要

目的 由于日本老年人口和痴呆患者数量的增加,目前精神科医生和神经科医生的数量仍然不足以治疗痴呆症。因此,在临床实践中寻求一种简单的方法来准确进行痴呆症诊断,包括初级保健医生。

方法 对 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月期间因记忆力减退首次就诊的患者进行回顾性研究。计算了 4 种空间识别和规划能力评估方法(狐狸手指模仿测试、五边形复制测试(PCT)、立方体复制测试(CCT)和时钟绘制测试(CDT))的灵敏度和特异性。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估 Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE)评分(作为记忆和语言障碍的评估)与 CDT 评分之间的差异。

结果 本研究共检查了 51 例痴呆患者和 6 例非痴呆患者。狐狸手指模仿测试的灵敏度和特异性分别为 31.4%和 100%,PCT 为 29.4%和 100%,CCT 为 62%和 83.3%,CDT 为 72.5%和 100%。当 CCT 和 CDT 结果相结合时,灵敏度增加到 78.4%。51 例痴呆患者 MMSE 和 CDT 评分之间的 Spearman 秩相关系数呈显著正相关(r=0.62,p<0.001)。比较阿尔茨海默病(AD)和路易体痴呆(DLB)患者,DLB 患者 MMSE 和 CDT 评分之间的差异显著更大。

结论 为了快速筛查痴呆症,建议将 CCT 和 CDT 结合使用以获得最高灵敏度(78.4%)。此外,CDT 和 MMSE 评分之间的差异被认为有助于区分 DLB 和 AD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa94/11116009/55db65ddc8b8/1349-7235-63-1223-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验