Costa Sigourney, St George Rebecca J, McDonald James Scott, Wang Xinyi, Alty Jane
School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia.
Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;7(4):72. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7040072.
Figure drawing tasks are commonly used standalone or as part of broader screening tests to detect cognitive impairment. Only one study has compared the classification accuracy of three common drawing tasks—overlapping infinity loops, wire cube, and the clock drawing task (CDT)—in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, but age and education, which impact performance, were not accounted for. We replicated the research, adjusting for age and education and, for the first time, assessed subjective cognitive decline (SCD) too. Participants were recruited from the Tasmanian ISLAND Cognitive Clinic and healthy controls from a community sample. All participants completed the three figure drawing tasks. The clinic patients were categorised according to interdisciplinary consensus diagnosis. Binomial logistic regression and area under ROC curves (AUC) were calculated to determine the discriminatory ability of each drawing task. Overall, 112 adults were recruited; 51 had normal cognition (NC), 21 SCD, 24 MCI, and 16 had dementia. The infinity loops test did not discriminate any of the groups, casting some doubt on its usefulness. The wire cube discriminated NC from dementia (AUC 0.7; p < 0.05). The CDT discriminated NC from dementia (AUC 0.77; p < 0.01), NC from cognitive impairment (dementia + MCI; AUC 0.59; p < 0.05), and MCI from dementia (AUC 0.76; p < 0.01). None of the tests discriminated NC from MCI or NC from SCD. The CDT was the most discriminatory test, followed by the wire cube. This may help guide clinicians who often choose just one figure drawing task due to time constraints or patient fatigue.
绘图任务通常单独使用,或作为更广泛筛查测试的一部分,以检测认知障碍。只有一项研究比较了三种常见绘图任务(重叠无限循环、金属丝立方体和画钟测试(CDT))在轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症中的分类准确性,但未考虑影响表现的年龄和教育因素。我们重复了这项研究,对年龄和教育因素进行了调整,并且首次也评估了主观认知下降(SCD)。参与者从塔斯马尼亚岛认知诊所招募,健康对照来自社区样本。所有参与者都完成了这三项绘图任务。诊所患者根据多学科共识诊断进行分类。计算二项式逻辑回归和ROC曲线下面积(AUC),以确定每项绘图任务的区分能力。总体而言,招募了112名成年人;51人认知正常(NC),21人有主观认知下降,24人患有MCI,16人患有痴呆症。无限循环测试无法区分任何一组,这让人对其有用性产生了一些怀疑。金属丝立方体测试能够区分NC和痴呆症(AUC 0.7;p<0.05)。CDT能够区分NC和痴呆症(AUC 0.77;p<0.01),NC和认知障碍(痴呆症+MCI;AUC 0.59;p<0.05),以及MCI和痴呆症(AUC 0.76;p<0.01)。没有一项测试能够区分NC和MCI或NC和SCD。CDT是最具区分性的测试,其次是金属丝立方体测试。这可能有助于指导临床医生,他们由于时间限制或患者疲劳,常常只选择一项绘图任务。