Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8638, Japan.
Endocr J. 2023 Oct 30;70(10):999-1003. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0330. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
The role of adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for locally advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is controversial because of the lack of prospective data. To prepare for a clinical trial, this study investigated the current clinical practice of adjuvant treatments for locally advanced DTC. A survey on treatment selection criteria for hypothetical locally advanced DTC was administered to representative thyroid surgeons of facilities participating in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Radiation Therapy Study Group. Of the 43 invited facilities, surgeons from 39 (91%) completed the survey. For R1 resection or suspected residual disease, 26 (67%) facilities administered high-dose (100-200 mCi) radioactive iodine (RAI), but none performed EBRT. For R2 resection or unresectable primary disease, 26 (67%) facilities administered high-dose RAI and 7 (18%) performed adjuvant treatments, including EBRT. For complete resection with nodal extra-capsular extension, 13 (34%) facilities administered high-dose RAI and 1 (3%) performed EBRT. For unresectable mediastinal lymph node metastasis, 31 (79%) facilities administered high-dose RAI and 5 (13%) performed adjuvant treatments, including EBRT. Adjuvant EBRT was not routinely performed mainly because of the lack of evidence for efficacy (74%). Approximately 15% of the facilities routinely considered adjuvant EBRT for DTC with R2 resection or unresectable primary or lymph node metastasis disease. Future clinical trials will need to optimize EBRT for these patients.
辅助外部束放射治疗 (EBRT) 治疗局部晚期分化型甲状腺癌 (DTC) 的作用存在争议,因为缺乏前瞻性数据。为了为临床试验做准备,本研究调查了局部晚期 DTC 辅助治疗的当前临床实践。对参加日本临床肿瘤学组放射治疗研究组的设施的代表性甲状腺外科医生进行了关于局部晚期 DTC 假设治疗选择标准的调查。在 43 家受邀机构中,有 39 家(91%)的外科医生完成了调查。对于 R1 切除或疑似残留疾病,26 家(67%)的机构给予高剂量(100-200 mCi)放射性碘(RAI),但无机构进行 EBRT。对于 R2 切除或不可切除的原发性疾病,26 家(67%)的机构给予高剂量 RAI,7 家(18%)进行辅助治疗,包括 EBRT。对于完全切除伴淋巴结外囊扩展,13 家(34%)的机构给予高剂量 RAI,1 家(3%)进行 EBRT。对于不可切除的纵隔淋巴结转移,31 家(79%)的机构给予高剂量 RAI,5 家(13%)进行辅助治疗,包括 EBRT。辅助 EBRT 通常不进行主要是因为缺乏疗效证据(74%)。大约 15%的机构通常认为 R2 切除或不可切除的原发性或淋巴结转移疾病的 DTC 患者需要辅助 EBRT。未来的临床试验将需要为这些患者优化 EBRT。