Suppr超能文献

中国医疗保健专业人员和患者对已上市移动医疗应用程序的评估:一项定性研究。

Healthcare professionals' and patients' assessments of listed mobile health apps in China: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Operation Room, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.

Department of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;11:1220160. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1220160. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, mobile health (mHealth) has gradually developed in China, and intelligent medicine has become an important research topic. However, there are still significant problems in mHealth applications (apps). Although healthcare professionals and patients are the main users, few studies have focused on their perceptions of the quality of mHealth apps.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) understand the respective perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients regarding mHealth apps, (2) assess what barriers exist that influence the user experience, and (3) explore how to improve the quality of mHealth apps and the development of the mHealth market in China. The study aims to promote the standardization of mHealth apps and provide effective information for the improvement and development of mHealth apps in the future.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews with 9 patients and 14 healthcare professionals were conducted from January 2022 to April 2022 in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. The participants used mHealth apps for more than 3 months, including the "Good Mood" and "Peace and Safe Doctors" apps and apps developed by the hospital that were popular in China. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The following five themes were extracted: different concerns, hidden medical dangers, distance and insecurity, barriers for older people, and having positive perceptions of mHealth apps. Healthcare professionals prioritized simplicity in regard to mHealth apps, whereas patients rated effectiveness as the most crucial factor. The study also revealed several problems with mHealth apps, including insufficient information about physician qualifications, inaccurate medical content, nonstandard treatment processes, and unclear accountability, which led to a sense of distance and insecurity among participants. Older individuals faced additional obstacles when using mHealth apps. Despite these issues, the participants remained optimistic about the future of mHealth app development.

CONCLUSION

The utilization, advantages, and obstacles of mHealth applications for healthcare professionals and patients were explored through semistructured interviews. Despite the promising prospects for mHealth apps in China, numerous issues still need to be addressed. Enhancing the safety monitoring system and developing user-friendly mHealth apps for older adult patients are essential steps to bridge the gap between healthcare providers and patients.

摘要

背景

近年来,移动医疗(mHealth)在中国逐渐发展,智能医疗已成为一个重要的研究课题。然而,mHealth 应用程序(apps)仍然存在重大问题。尽管医疗保健专业人员和患者是主要用户,但很少有研究关注他们对 mHealth 应用程序质量的看法。

目的

本研究旨在(1)了解医疗保健专业人员和患者对 mHealth 应用程序的各自看法,(2)评估影响用户体验的障碍,以及(3)探索如何提高 mHealth 应用程序的质量和中国 mHealth 市场的发展。该研究旨在促进 mHealth 应用程序的标准化,并为未来 mHealth 应用程序的改进和发展提供有效信息。

方法

2022 年 1 月至 4 月,在徐州医科大学附属医院对 9 名患者和 14 名医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。参与者使用 mHealth 应用程序超过 3 个月,包括在中国流行的“好心情”和“平安医生”应用程序以及医院开发的应用程序。使用主题分析对访谈记录进行分析。

结果

提取了以下五个主题:不同的关注点、潜在的医疗危险、距离和不安全感、老年人的障碍以及对 mHealth 应用程序的积极看法。医疗保健专业人员优先考虑 mHealth 应用程序的简单性,而患者则将有效性评为最重要的因素。研究还揭示了 mHealth 应用程序存在的一些问题,包括医师资格信息不足、医疗内容不准确、治疗过程不规范以及责任不清,这导致参与者感到距离和不安全感。老年人在使用 mHealth 应用程序时还面临其他障碍。尽管存在这些问题,参与者对 mHealth 应用程序的未来仍然持乐观态度。

结论

通过半结构化访谈探讨了医疗保健专业人员和患者对 mHealth 应用程序的使用、优势和障碍。尽管 mHealth 应用在中国前景广阔,但仍有许多问题需要解决。加强安全监测系统并为老年患者开发用户友好型 mHealth 应用程序是弥合医疗保健提供者和患者之间差距的重要步骤。

相似文献

9
mHealth apps design using quality function deployment.使用质量功能展开的移动医疗应用程序设计
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 May 13;32(4):698-708. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2018-0195.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
A Review of the Quality and Impact of Mobile Health Apps.移动健康应用程序的质量与影响综述
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:117-134. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-103738. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验