Qin Xiaoting, Pate Cynthia A, Zahran Hatice S
Asthma and Community Health Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):100085. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100085. eCollection 2023 May.
Asthma prevalence estimates among adults are limited for urban-rural classification across sociodemographic characteristics.
This study examined current asthma prevalence and annual trends by 6-level urban-rural categories across sociodemographic characteristics among US adults.
Asthma prevalence for 2020 and annual trends for 2012-20 were estimated using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. The 2013 National Center for Health Statistics urban and rural categories were used to define urban-rural status.
Current asthma prevalence was higher in medium (9.7%; prevalence ratio 1.103 [95% CI 1.037, 1.174]) and small (9.9%; 1.111 [1.031, 1.197]) metro than in large fringe metropolitan (8.6%), was higher in micropolitan (10.2%) than in both large fringe (8.6%; 1.115 [1.042, 1.194]) and large central metropolitan (8.8%; 1.080 [1.001, 1.066]) areas. Prevalence by sociodemographic characteristics varied between urban-rural scheme; the prevalence was significantly higher among adults aged 55-64 years in micropolitan (11.9%), women in small metro (12.8%), and other race non-Hispanic in noncore (most rural) (13.6%) areas, adults without a high school diploma in micropolitan areas (13.8%), household income <100% of federal poverty level in micropolitan areas (15.7%), and adults with insurance coverage in micropolitan areas (10.3%) compared to the corresponding populations in other urban-rural categories. During 2012-20, an increasing trend in prevalence was observed only in medium metro areas, with an annual percentage change of 0.81.
Asthma prevalence differed by 6-level urban-rural categories. These findings might be helpful in establishing effective asthma control programs and targeting resource allocation at the local level.
关于按社会人口学特征进行城乡分类的成年人哮喘患病率估计有限。
本研究调查了美国成年人中按六级城乡类别划分的当前哮喘患病率及年度趋势,并分析了其社会人口学特征。
使用行为危险因素监测系统数据估计2020年的哮喘患病率以及2012 - 2022年的年度趋势。采用2013年国家卫生统计中心的城乡分类来定义城乡状况。
中型(9.7%;患病率比1.103 [95%可信区间1.037, 1.174])和小型(9.9%;1.111 [1.031, 1.197])都市统计区的当前哮喘患病率高于大型边缘都市统计区(8.6%),微型都市统计区(10.2%)的患病率高于大型边缘(8.6%;1.115 [1.042, 1.194])和大型中心都市统计区(8.8%;1.080 [1.001, 1.066])地区。社会人口学特征的患病率在城乡分类方案之间存在差异;微型都市统计区中55 - 64岁成年人(11.9%)、小型都市统计区女性(12.8%)、非核心(最农村)地区其他非西班牙裔种族(13.6%)成年人、微型都市统计区未获得高中文凭的成年人(13.8%)、微型都市统计区家庭收入低于联邦贫困水平100%的成年人(15.7%)以及微型都市统计区有保险覆盖的成年人(10.3%)的患病率显著高于其他城乡类别的相应人群。在2012 - 2022年期间,仅在中型都市统计区观察到患病率呈上升趋势,年变化百分比为0.81。
哮喘患病率因六级城乡类别而异。这些发现可能有助于制定有效的哮喘控制计划并在地方层面进行资源分配。