Chunduru Ramyaja, Rachel Pamila, Kailasam Vignesh, Padmanabhan Sridevi
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Tamil Nadu, India.
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Sep 29;36(3):208-215. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.4.
This systematic review was intended to evaluate the maxillary sinus dimensions in vertical and sagittal craniofacial patterns and to assess if there was a difference among the craniofacial patterns. A systematic search was performed in seven databases till February 2021. The risk of bias was performed with modified Newcastle Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model. Twelve studies were included in the review and 8 in the meta-analysis. Compared to Class I malocclusion, the maxillary sinus area is greater in Class II and lesser in Class III malocclusion. On comparing normo-divergent growth pattern, the maxillary sinus area is lesser in hypo-divergent and greater in hyper-divergent individuals. Most of the studies were graded as satisfactory. The measurements are greater in hyper-divergent Class II malocclusion and in males.
本系统评价旨在评估垂直和矢状颅面型中上颌窦的尺寸,并评估颅面型之间是否存在差异。截至2021年2月,在七个数据库中进行了系统检索。采用改良的纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行偏倚风险评估。使用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。本评价纳入12项研究,Meta分析纳入8项研究。与安氏I类错牙合相比,安氏II类错牙合上颌窦面积更大,安氏III类错牙合上颌窦面积更小。与平均生长型相比,低角型个体上颌窦面积更小,高角型个体上颌窦面积更大。大多数研究被评为满意。高角型安氏II类错牙合及男性的测量值更大。