• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同颅面型个体的额窦形态是否存在差异?一项系统评价与Meta分析

Is There Variation in the Morphology of the Frontal Sinus in Individuals with Different Craniofacial Patterns? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Küchler Erika Calvano, Oliveira Maria Beatriz Carvalho Ribeiro de, Madalena Isabela Ribeiro, Kirschneck Christian, Beisel-Memmert Svenja, de Oliveira Daniela Silva Barroso, Schroder Ângela Graciela Deliga, Lepri César Penazzo, de Menezes-Oliveira Maria Angélica Hueb, Marañón-Vásquez Guido Artemio

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, 53111 Bonn, Germany.

Department of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba, Uberaba 38010-200, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(5):143. doi: 10.3390/dj12050143.

DOI:10.3390/dj12050143
PMID:38786541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11119789/
Abstract

To evaluate differences in the morphology of the frontal sinus in adolescents and adults with different craniofacial patterns, searches up to April 2024 were conducted in six databases and other information sources to identify observational studies. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the NOS scale were performed independently by two reviewers. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the difference in frontal sinus measurements between different craniofacial skeletal patterns (α = 0.05). The certainty of the evidence was evaluated according to GRADE. Fourteen studies were included in the review. All studies had methodological limitations that affected their quality. The syntheses showed that skeletal Class II subjects presented a significantly smaller width of the frontal sinus than skeletal Class I subjects (MD = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.74; < 0.0001; I = 3%). Skeletal Class III subjects showed a frontal sinus width (MD = -0.91; 95% CI: -1.35, -0.47; < 0.0001; I = 36%) and area (MD = -28.13; 95% CI: -49.03, -7.23; = 0.0084; I = 66%) significantly larger than those of the skeletal Class I subjects. The available evidence suggests a positive relationship between mandibular and frontal sinus size. There is limited evidence to make reliable estimates of the association of other craniofacial patterns and frontal sinus characteristics. These reported results are not conclusive and should be evaluated carefully due to the very low certainty of the evidence. The current evidence is scarce and consists of studies with methodological limitations; the results of the studies are often inconsistent, and the pooled estimates are imprecise. New high-quality research is still necessary.

摘要

为评估不同颅面模式的青少年和成年人额窦形态的差异,截至2024年4月在六个数据库及其他信息来源进行检索,以识别观察性研究。两名评审员独立进行研究选择、数据提取以及使用NOS量表进行质量评估。采用随机效应荟萃分析来估计不同颅面骨骼模式之间额窦测量值的差异(α = 0.05)。根据GRADE评估证据的确定性。该综述纳入了14项研究。所有研究均存在影响其质量的方法学局限性。综合分析表明,骨骼II类受试者的额窦宽度明显小于骨骼I类受试者(MD = 0.56;95% CI:0.38,0.74;P < 0.0001;I² = 3%)。骨骼III类受试者的额窦宽度(MD = -0.91;95% CI:-1.35,-0.47;P < 0.0001;I² = 36%)和面积(MD = -28.13;95% CI:-49.03,-7.23;P = 0.0084;I² = 66%)明显大于骨骼I类受试者。现有证据表明下颌骨大小与额窦大小之间存在正相关关系。关于其他颅面模式与额窦特征关联的可靠估计证据有限。这些报告结果并不确凿,由于证据的确定性非常低,应谨慎评估。目前证据稀少,且所纳入研究存在方法学局限性;研究结果往往不一致,汇总估计也不精确。仍需要新的高质量研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/2046ac550b5d/dentistry-12-00143-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/4e99f8729be2/dentistry-12-00143-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/4ebb19478cff/dentistry-12-00143-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/b1aaf6a152aa/dentistry-12-00143-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/0f7283153478/dentistry-12-00143-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/dcd0663d3a3e/dentistry-12-00143-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/b7d7680bc937/dentistry-12-00143-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/1b10575be35d/dentistry-12-00143-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/3594578e8f8d/dentistry-12-00143-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/2046ac550b5d/dentistry-12-00143-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/4e99f8729be2/dentistry-12-00143-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/4ebb19478cff/dentistry-12-00143-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/b1aaf6a152aa/dentistry-12-00143-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/0f7283153478/dentistry-12-00143-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/dcd0663d3a3e/dentistry-12-00143-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/b7d7680bc937/dentistry-12-00143-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/1b10575be35d/dentistry-12-00143-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/3594578e8f8d/dentistry-12-00143-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03aa/11119789/2046ac550b5d/dentistry-12-00143-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Is There Variation in the Morphology of the Frontal Sinus in Individuals with Different Craniofacial Patterns? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.不同颅面型个体的额窦形态是否存在差异?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(5):143. doi: 10.3390/dj12050143.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Is there variation in the depth of the curve of Spee in individuals with different dentoskeletal patterns? A systematic review with meta-analysis.不同牙颌类型个体的 Spee 曲线深度是否存在差异?系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2022 Sep 19;44(5):491-502. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab078.
4
Volumetric Assessment of the Frontal Sinus in Female Adolescents and Its Relationship with Craniofacial Morphology and Orthodontic Treatment: A Pilot Study.女性青少年额窦容积评估及其与颅面形态和正畸治疗的关系:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127287.
5
The relationship between the dimensions of frontal air sinus and skeletal malocclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.额窦大小与骨骼错牙合畸形的关系:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 8;10(2):e24200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24200. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
6
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
7
Morphological and dimensional variations of the frontal air sinuses in a group of adolescent Caucasians and Chinese in different skeletal malocclusions: a cross-sectional cephalometric study.不同骨骼错颌畸形的青少年白种人和中国人额窦的形态和大小变化:一项横断面头影测量研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5711-5719. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04527-5. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
The relationship between frontal sinus dimensions and skeletal malocclusion.额窦尺寸与骨骼错牙合之间的关系。
Eur Oral Res. 2022 Sep 5;56(3):130-135. doi: 10.26650/eor.2022938080.
9
The relationship between third molar agenesis and craniofacial morphology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.第三磨牙缺失与颅面形态的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;46(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad081.
10
Incremental or maximal mandibular advancement in the treatment of class II malocclusion through functional appliances: A systematic review with meta-analysis.功能矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)中下颌逐步或最大前伸:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Nov;23(4):371-384. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12388. Epub 2020 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Frontal Sinus Volume and Cranial Base Length Based on Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study.基于不同垂直骨骼类型的额窦容积和颅底长度评估:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Cureus. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):e55099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55099. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
The relationship between the dimensions of frontal air sinus and skeletal malocclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.额窦大小与骨骼错牙合畸形的关系:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 8;10(2):e24200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24200. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
3
A cross-sectional study: correlation of forehead morphology and dentoskeletal malocclusion in Chinese people.
一项横断面研究:中国人额部形态与牙颌骨骼错(牙合)畸形的相关性。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03795-1.
4
Investigating the link between frontal sinus morphology and craniofacial characteristics with sex: A 3D CBCT study on the South Indian population.探讨额窦形态与颅面特征性别相关性的研究:基于 3D CBCT 的对印度南部人群的研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 11;12:811. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.137008.2. eCollection 2023.
5
The relationship between frontal sinus dimensions and skeletal malocclusion.额窦尺寸与骨骼错牙合之间的关系。
Eur Oral Res. 2022 Sep 5;56(3):130-135. doi: 10.26650/eor.2022938080.
6
Prevalence of Orthodontic Malocclusions in Healthy Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.健康儿童和青少年的正畸错颌畸形患病率:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127446.
7
Volumetric Assessment of the Frontal Sinus in Female Adolescents and Its Relationship with Craniofacial Morphology and Orthodontic Treatment: A Pilot Study.女性青少年额窦容积评估及其与颅面形态和正畸治疗的关系:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127287.
8
Morphological and dimensional variations of the frontal air sinuses in a group of adolescent Caucasians and Chinese in different skeletal malocclusions: a cross-sectional cephalometric study.不同骨骼错颌畸形的青少年白种人和中国人额窦的形态和大小变化:一项横断面头影测量研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5711-5719. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04527-5. Epub 2022 May 12.
9
A CBCT based analysis of the correlation between volumetric morphology of the frontal sinuses and the facial growth pattern in caucasian subjects. A cross-sectional study.基于 CBCT 的白种人头面部生长模式与额窦容积形态相关性的分析。一项横断面研究。
Head Face Med. 2022 Feb 2;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00308-3.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.