Zhang Fan, Luo Man, Liu De-Xing, Zhu Yu-Hang, Zhu Zhao-Qiong
Department of Anesthesiology Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University Zunyi Guizhou China.
College of Animal Science/Institute of Agro-Bioengineering and Key Laboratory of Plant Resource Conservative and Germplam Innovation in Mountainous Region Guizhou University Guiyang Guizhou China.
Ibrain. 2021 Dec 8;7(4):278-287. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12002. eCollection 2021 Winter.
Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia is one of the most common pain relief methods in the postoperative period, but its adverse reactions remain high. This study aimed to explore the role of improved combined analgesia methods in pain, sedation, postoperative nausea, and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries. This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study. A study population of 72 patients undergoing gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to either the TAPB + S group or the TAPB + N group. All patients in both groups underwent a transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) after induction of anesthesia. The TAPB + S group received a continuous intravenous infusion (2 ml/h) of sufentanil (1 μg/kg) plus metoclopramide (30 mg) through 100 ml elastomeric pumps postoperatively. The TAPB + N group received a continuous intravenous infusion (2 ml/h) of nalbuphine hydrochloride (1 mg/kg) plus metoclopramide (30 mg) postoperatively. The main outcome measures were as follows: postoperative pain intensity, Ramsay sedation score (RSS) after surgery, PONV occurrence rate, and rescue analgesics. The RSS of the TAPB + S group was significantly higher than that of the TAPB + N group at 2, 4, and 6 h after the operation. However, the visual analog scale score of the TAPB + S group was much higher than that of the TAPB + N group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of consumption of opioids and other narcotic drugs at 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h after the operation. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to PONV and other adverse events in both groups. Taken together, our data indicate that the TAPB + N program can provide better postoperative analgesia and also reduce the use of strong opioids. The more optimized scheme of perioperative analgesia still needs to be researched further.
患者自控静脉镇痛是术后最常用的疼痛缓解方法之一,但其不良反应发生率仍然很高。本研究旨在探讨改良联合镇痛方法在妇科手术患者疼痛、镇静、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)方面的作用。本研究为前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。72例接受妇科手术的患者被随机分为TAPB + S组或TAPB + N组。两组所有患者在麻醉诱导后均接受腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)。TAPB + S组术后通过100 ml弹力泵持续静脉输注(2 ml/h)舒芬太尼(1 μg/kg)加甲氧氯普胺(30 mg)。TAPB + N组术后持续静脉输注(2 ml/h)盐酸纳布啡(1 mg/kg)加甲氧氯普胺(30 mg)。主要观察指标如下:术后疼痛强度、术后Ramsay镇静评分(RSS)、PONV发生率和补救性镇痛药。术后2、4和6小时,TAPB + S组的RSS显著高于TAPB + N组。然而,TAPB + S组的视觉模拟量表评分远高于TAPB + N组。术后2、4、6、24和48小时,两组在阿片类药物和其他麻醉药物的消耗量方面无显著差异。两组在PONV和其他不良事件方面未发现统计学显著差异。综上所述,我们的数据表明,TAPB + N方案可以提供更好的术后镇痛效果,还可以减少强效阿片类药物的使用。围手术期镇痛的更优化方案仍需进一步研究。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018-4-4