Turkoz Ibrahim, Wong Joshua, Chee Benjamin, Siddiqui Uzma, Knight R Karl, Richarz Ute, Correll Christoph U
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ 08560-0200, USA.
Advanced Analytics, Holmusk, Singapore.
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2023 Sep 29;13:20451253231200258. doi: 10.1177/20451253231200258. eCollection 2023.
The paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) long-acting injectable formulation is currently the longest dosing interval available for schizophrenia treatment.
To compare treatment outcomes between a real-world external comparator arm (ECA; NeuroBlu database) and the PP6M open-label extension (OLE) clinical trial arm.
The ECA comprised patients receiving PP 1-month (PP1M) or PP 3-month (PP3M) for ⩾12 months without a relapse. The PP6M OLE arm included patients with PP1M treatment prior to randomization who completed the 12-month double-blind PP6M study on either PP3M or PP6M relapse-free. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to study time-to-relapse (primary outcome) and change in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score (secondary outcome).
At 24 months, 3.9% (7/178) of patients in the PP6M cohort experienced a relapse 15.6% (26/167) in the ECA. Time-to-relapse was longer in the PP6M cohort the ECA at 12-, 18-, and 24-months across the different weighting methods; median time-to-relapse was not reached in both cohorts. Hazard ratio (HR) for relapse was significantly lower for the PP6M cohort the ECA throughout the duration of the study [HR at 24 months: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08-0.42), < 0.001]. At 24 months, change in CGI-S score for the PP6M cohort was 0.76 points lower than the ECA ( < 0.001). Results were similar in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching (PSM); IPTW resulted in larger sample sizes in balanced dataset than PSM.
Consistent findings across weighting and matching methods suggest PP6M efficacy in reducing and delaying relapses and long-term symptom control compared to PP1M/PP3M in usual-care settings. Additional confounds, such as greater illness severity and more frequent comorbidities and comedications in the ECA, were not fully controlled by the applied statistical methods. Future real-world studies directly comparing PP6M with PP3M/PP1M and adjusting for these confounders are warranted.
棕榈酸帕利哌酮6个月(PP6M)长效注射制剂是目前用于精神分裂症治疗的最长给药间隔制剂。
比较真实世界外部对照臂(ECA;NeuroBlu数据库)和PP6M开放标签扩展(OLE)临床试验臂之间的治疗结果。
ECA包括接受PP 1个月(PP1M)或PP 3个月(PP3M)治疗≥12个月且未复发的患者。PP6M OLE臂包括随机分组前接受PP1M治疗且完成了关于PP3M或PP6M无复发的12个月双盲PP6M研究的患者。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)来研究复发时间(主要结局)和临床总体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)评分的变化(次要结局)。
在24个月时,PP6M队列中有3.9%(7/178)的患者复发,而ECA中为15.6%(26/167)。在12个月、18个月和24个月时,不同加权方法下PP6M队列的复发时间均长于ECA;两个队列均未达到复发时间中位数。在整个研究期间,PP6M队列的复发风险比(HR)显著低于ECA [24个月时的HR:0.18(95% CI:0.08 - 0.42),P < 0.001]。在24个月时,PP6M队列的CGI-S评分变化比ECA低0.76分(P < 0.001)。在使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)的敏感性分析中结果相似;IPTW在平衡数据集中导致的样本量比PSM更大。
加权和匹配方法的一致结果表明,与常规治疗环境中的PP1M/PP3M相比,PP6M在减少和延迟复发以及长期症状控制方面具有疗效。应用的统计方法未完全控制其他混杂因素,如ECA中更高的疾病严重程度、更频繁的合并症和联合用药。未来有必要进行直接比较PP6M与PP3M/PP1M并对这些混杂因素进行调整的真实世界研究。