Mousa Mohammad F, Cubbidge Robert P, Al-Mansouri Fatima, Bener Abdulbari
Department of Ophthalmology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;28(1):49-65. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.1.49. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is a newly introduced method used for objective visual field assessment. Several analysis protocols have been tested to identify early visual field losses in glaucoma patients using the mfVEP technique, some were successful in detection of field defects, which were comparable to the standard automated perimetry (SAP) visual field assessment, and others were not very informative and needed more adjustment and research work. In this study we implemented a novel analysis approach and evaluated its validity and whether it could be used effectively for early detection of visual field defects in glaucoma.
Three groups were tested in this study; normal controls (38 eyes), glaucoma patients (36 eyes) and glaucoma suspect patients (38 eyes). All subjects had a two standard Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) test 24-2 and a single mfVEP test undertaken in one session. Analysis of the mfVEP results was done using the new analysis protocol; the hemifield sector analysis (HSA) protocol. Analysis of the HFA was done using the standard grading system.
Analysis of mfVEP results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the three groups in the mean signal to noise ratio (ANOVA test, p < 0.001 with a 95% confidence interval). The difference between superior and inferior hemispheres in all subjects were statistically significant in the glaucoma patient group in all 11 sectors (t-test, p < 0.001), partially significant in 5 / 11 (t-test, p < 0.01), and no statistical difference in most sectors of the normal group (1 / 11 sectors was significant, t-test, p < 0.9). Sensitivity and specificity of the HSA protocol in detecting glaucoma was 97% and 86%, respectively, and for glaucoma suspect patients the values were 89% and 79%, respectively.
The new HSA protocol used in the mfVEP testing can be applied to detect glaucomatous visual field defects in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Using this protocol can provide information about focal visual field differences across the horizontal midline, which can be utilized to differentiate between glaucoma and normal subjects. Sensitivity and specificity of the mfVEP test showed very promising results and correlated with other anatomical changes in glaucoma field loss.
多焦视觉诱发电位(mfVEP)是一种新引入的用于客观视野评估的方法。已经测试了几种分析方案,以使用mfVEP技术识别青光眼患者早期视野缺损,一些方案成功检测到了与标准自动视野计(SAP)视野评估相当的视野缺损,而其他方案信息量不足,需要更多调整和研究工作。在本研究中,我们实施了一种新的分析方法,并评估了其有效性以及是否可有效用于青光眼视野缺损的早期检测。
本研究测试了三组;正常对照组(38只眼)、青光眼患者(36只眼)和青光眼可疑患者(38只眼)。所有受试者在一次检查中均进行了两次标准的 Humphrey 视野分析仪(HFA)24-2 测试和一次 mfVEP 测试。使用新的分析方案,即半视野扇形分析(HSA)方案对 mfVEP 结果进行分析。使用标准分级系统对 HFA 进行分析。
mfVEP 结果分析表明,三组之间的平均信噪比存在统计学显著差异(方差分析测试,p < 0.001,95%置信区间)。在青光眼患者组的所有11个扇形区域中,所有受试者上、下半球之间的差异均具有统计学显著性(t 检验,p < 0.001),在5/11个扇形区域中部分显著(t 检验,p < 0.01),而在正常组的大多数扇形区域中无统计学差异(1/11个扇形区域显著,t 检验,p < 0.9)。HSA 方案检测青光眼的敏感性和特异性分别为97%和86%,对于青光眼可疑患者,其值分别为89%和79%。
mfVEP 测试中使用的新 HSA 方案可应用于检测青光眼和青光眼可疑患者的青光眼性视野缺损。使用该方案可提供有关水平中线两侧局部视野差异的信息,可用于区分青光眼患者和正常受试者。mfVEP 测试的敏感性和特异性显示出非常有前景的结果,并且与青光眼视野缺损中的其他解剖学变化相关。