• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Short-Term Costs and Benefits of a Nationwide Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: Retrospective Observational Study.评估英格兰全国糖尿病预防计划的短期成本和效益:回顾性观察研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Nov;21(6):891-903. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00830-8. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.
3
Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model.使用马尔可夫模型评估英国国民健康服务体系糖尿病预防计划的长期成本效益。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Jul;8(4):569-583. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00487-6. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
4
Cost-effectiveness of personal tailored risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of the NHS stop smoking services: the Start2quit randomized controlled trial.提高国民保健制度戒烟服务利用率的个人定制风险信息和品尝课程的成本效益:Start2quit 随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2018 Apr;113(4):708-718. doi: 10.1111/add.14086. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Assessing the potential return on investment of the proposed UK NHS diabetes prevention programme in different population subgroups: an economic evaluation.评估英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)拟议的糖尿病预防计划在不同人群亚组中的潜在投资回报率:一项经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e014953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014953.
6
BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A.BoTULS 研究:一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在评估 A 型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的临床疗效和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(26):1-113, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14260.
7
Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.利用替代偏好评分和试验内方法估计成本效益:使用 EQ-5D 5 级版本和恢复生活质量效用指数探索质量调整生命年的动态。
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):1018-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1358. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Cost-effectiveness of a pragmatic structured education intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes: economic evaluation of data from the Let's Prevent Diabetes cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项实用结构化教育干预预防2型糖尿病的成本效益:来自“让我们预防糖尿病”整群随机对照试验数据的经济评估
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 9;7(1):e013592. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013592.
9
START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a manual-based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of carers of people with dementia.START(亲属策略)研究:一项实用随机对照试验,以确定基于手册的应对策略方案在促进痴呆症患者照料者心理健康方面的临床有效性和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(61):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta18610.
10
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme and incident multiple long-term conditions.英国国民健康服务糖尿病预防计划与新发多种长期病症之间的关联
Nat Med. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03922-1.
2
The effect of a community-based health behaviour intervention on health-related quality of life in people with Type 2 diabetes in Nepal: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于社区的健康行为干预对尼泊尔2型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03971-6.
3
Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model.使用马尔可夫模型评估英国国民健康服务体系糖尿病预防计划的长期成本效益。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Jul;8(4):569-583. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00487-6. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
4
Level of attendance at the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划的参与度与 2 型糖尿病进展风险。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jan 12;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01554-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England.糖尿病预防计划是否会导致 2 型糖尿病的社会人口学不平等加剧?对英格兰调查和行政数据的比较。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Sep;77(9):565-570. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219654. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis.转诊至英国国民保健署糖尿病预防计划以及从不伴糖尿病高血糖状态转归为 2 型糖尿病:一项匹配队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(2):e1004177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004177. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Explaining the UK's 'high-risk' approach to type 2 diabetes prevention: findings from a qualitative interview study with policy-makers in England.解释英国 2 型糖尿病预防的“高风险”方法:英格兰政策制定者定性访谈研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):e066301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066301.
4
Population level impact of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme on incidence of type 2 diabetes in England: An observational study.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划对英格兰2型糖尿病发病率的人群水平影响:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 May 29;19:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100420. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force.《健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)》2022 年解释与详述:ISPOR CHEERS II 良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):10-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008.
6
The effects of structure, process and outcome incentives on primary care referrals to a national prevention programme.结构、过程和结果激励对初级保健转介到国家预防计划的影响。
Health Econ. 2021 Jun;30(6):1393-1416. doi: 10.1002/hec.4262. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Lifestyle Intervention With or Without Lay Volunteers to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes in People With Impaired Fasting Glucose and/or Nondiabetic Hyperglycemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.生活方式干预联合或不联合非专业志愿者对空腹血糖受损和/或非糖尿病性高血糖人群预防 2 型糖尿病的随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):168-178. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5938.
8
Early Outcomes From the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划的早期成果
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):152-160. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1425. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
Geographical epidemiology of health and overall deprivation in England, its changes and persistence from 2004 to 2015: a longitudinal spatial population study.英格兰健康与整体贫困的地理流行病学:2004 年至 2015 年的变化和持续性:一项纵向空间人口研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Feb;72(2):140-147. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209999. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Prediabetes diagnosis and treatment: A review.糖尿病前期的诊断与治疗:综述
World J Diabetes. 2015 Mar 15;6(2):296-303. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.296.

评估英格兰全国糖尿病预防计划的短期成本和效益:回顾性观察研究。

Evaluating the Short-Term Costs and Benefits of a Nationwide Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: Retrospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Nov;21(6):891-903. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00830-8. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-023-00830-8
PMID:37787972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10628047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevention programmes typically incur short-term costs and uncertain long-term benefits. We use the National Health Service (NHS) England Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP) to investigate whether behaviour change programmes may be cost-effective even within the short-term participation period.

METHODS

We analysed 384,611 referrals between June 2016 and March 2019. We estimated NHS costs using implementation costs and provider payments. We used linear regressions to relate utility changes to the number of sessions attended, based on responses to the five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline and final session for 18,959 participants. We then calculated the corresponding quality-adjusted life year (QALY) change for all 384,611 referrals by combining the estimated regression coefficients with the observed level of attendance, with individuals that did not attend any programme sessions being assumed to experience zero benefit. In secondary analysis, we added weight change, recorded for 18,105 participants to the regression and applied predicted values to all referrals with missing weight change values estimated using multiple imputation with chained equations. We then estimated the cost-per-QALY generated.

RESULTS

Average cost per referral was £119 (standard deviation: £118; 2020 price year, UK £ Sterling). Each session attended was associated with a 0.0042 increase in utility (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0025-0.0059). This generated 1,773 QALYs across all referrals (95% CI: 889-2,656). Cost-per-QALY was £24,929 (95% CI: £16,635-49,720) when implementation costs were excluded. Secondary analysis showed each session attended and kilogram of weight lost were associated with 0.0034 (95% CI: 0.0016-0.0051) and 0.0025 (95% CI: 0.0020-0.0031) increases in utility, respectively. These generated 1,542 QALYs, at a cost-per-QALY of £28,661 when implementation costs were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Participants experienced small utility gains from session attendance and weight loss during their programme participation. These benefits alone made this low-cost behaviour change programme potentially cost-effective in the short-term.

摘要

背景

预防计划通常会产生短期成本和不确定的长期效益。我们使用英格兰国民保健服务(NHS)糖尿病预防计划(NHS-DPP)来研究行为改变计划即使在短期参与期间是否也具有成本效益。

方法

我们分析了 2016 年 6 月至 2019 年 3 月期间的 384611 例转介。我们使用实施成本和提供者付款来估计 NHS 成本。我们使用线性回归根据基线和最终会话中 18959 名参与者的五个级别的 EQ-5D(EQ-5D-5L)响应来关联效用变化与参加的会话次数之间的关系。然后,我们通过将估计的回归系数与观察到的出勤水平结合起来,为所有 384611 例转介计算了相应的质量调整生命年(QALY)变化,对于未参加任何方案会议的个体,假定他们没有获得任何收益。在二次分析中,我们将体重变化添加到回归中,该体重变化记录于 18105 名参与者中,并且对于所有未记录体重变化值的转介使用带有连锁方程的多重插补来估计缺失值,应用预测值。然后,我们估计了产生的每 QALY 的成本。

结果

每个转介的平均成本为 119 英镑(标准差:118 英镑;2020 年价格,英国英镑)。每次参加会议与效用增加 0.0042 相关(95%置信区间(CI):0.0025-0.0059)。这在所有转介中产生了 1773 个 QALY(95%CI:889-2656)。排除实施成本后,每 QALY 的成本为 24929 英镑(95%CI:16635-49720)。二次分析表明,每次参加会议和减轻一公斤体重与效用分别增加 0.0034(95%CI:0.0016-0.0051)和 0.0025(95%CI:0.0020-0.0031)相关。排除实施成本后,这些产生了 1542 个 QALY,每 QALY 的成本为 28661 英镑。

结论

参与者在参与计划期间从会议出勤和体重减轻中获得了较小的效用收益。仅凭这些收益,这项低成本的行为改变计划在短期内就具有潜在的成本效益。