• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病预防计划是否会导致 2 型糖尿病的社会人口学不平等加剧?对英格兰调查和行政数据的比较。

Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England.

机构信息

Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, Department of Social Statistics, School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Sep;77(9):565-570. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219654. Epub 2023 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2022-219654
PMID:37353312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10423529/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or deprivation is not known.

METHODS

We used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to compare whether the population with NDH at different stages of the programme are representative of the population with NDH: stages include (1) prevalence of NDH (using survey data from UK Household Longitudinal Study (n=794) and Health Survey for England (n=1383)); (2) identification in primary care and offer of programme (using administrative data from the National Diabetes Audit (n=1 267 350)) and (3) programme participation (using programme provider records (n=98 024)).

RESULTS

Predicted probabilities drawn from the regressions with demographics as each outcome and dataset identifier as predictors showed that younger adults (aged under 40) (4% of the population with NDH (95% CI 2.4% to 6.5%)) and older adults (aged 80 and above) (12% (95% CI 9.5% to 14.2%)) were slightly under-represented among programme participants (2% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.2%) and 8% (95% CI 7.8% to 8.2%) of programme participants, respectively). People living in deprived areas were under-represented in eight sessions (14% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.4%) vs 20% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.6%) in the general population). Ethnic minorities were over-represented among offers (35% (95% CI 35.1% to 35.6%) vs 13% (95% CI 9.1% to 16.4%) in general population), though the proportion dropped at the programme completion stage (19% (95% CI 18.5% to 19.5%)).

CONCLUSION

The DPP has the potential to reduce ethnic inequalities, but may widen socioeconomic, age and limiting illness or disability-related inequalities in T2DM. While ethnic minority groups are over-represented at the identification and offer stages, efforts are required to support completion of the programme. Programme providers should target under-represented groups to ensure equitable access and narrow inequalities in T2DM.

摘要

背景

英国国民保健制度(NHS)的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)是一项针对非糖尿病性高血糖人群(NDH)预防 2 型糖尿病的行为干预措施。该计划如何通过年龄、性别、限制疾病或残疾、种族或贫困程度来影响不平等现象尚不清楚。

方法

我们使用多项和二元逻辑回归模型来比较不同阶段的 NDH 人群是否代表 NDH 人群:阶段包括(1)NDH 的患病率(使用来自英国家庭纵向研究的调查数据(n=794)和英格兰健康调查(n=1383));(2)在初级保健中确定并提供计划(使用国家糖尿病审计的行政数据(n=1 267 350))和(3)计划参与(使用计划提供商记录(n=98 024))。

结果

从回归中得出的预测概率,以人口统计学作为每个结果,并以数据集标识符作为预测因子,表明年轻成年人(年龄在 40 岁以下)(NDH 人群的 4%(95%CI 2.4%至 6.5%))和老年人(80 岁及以上)(12%(95%CI 9.5%至 14.2%))在计划参与者中略低(分别为 2%(95%CI 1.8%至 2.2%)和 8%(95%CI 7.8%至 8.2%))。生活在贫困地区的人在八节课中代表性不足(14%(95%CI 13.7%至 14.4%)与普通人群中的 20%(95%CI 16.4%至 23.6%))。少数民族在提供方面的代表性过高(35%(95%CI 35.1%至 35.6%)与普通人群中的 13%(95%CI 9.1%至 16.4%)),尽管在计划完成阶段比例下降(19%(95%CI 18.5%至 19.5%))。

结论

DPP 有可能减少种族不平等,但可能会扩大与 2 型糖尿病相关的社会经济、年龄和限制疾病或残疾方面的不平等。虽然少数民族在识别和提供阶段的代表性过高,但仍需要努力支持计划的完成。计划提供者应针对代表性不足的群体,以确保公平获得机会,并缩小 2 型糖尿病方面的不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/91720806367a/jech-2022-219654f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/a73ad0ecbeb7/jech-2022-219654f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/faea07c66d00/jech-2022-219654f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/64437c81154b/jech-2022-219654f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/91720806367a/jech-2022-219654f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/a73ad0ecbeb7/jech-2022-219654f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/faea07c66d00/jech-2022-219654f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/64437c81154b/jech-2022-219654f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc84/10423529/91720806367a/jech-2022-219654f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England.糖尿病预防计划是否会导致 2 型糖尿病的社会人口学不平等加剧?对英格兰调查和行政数据的比较。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Sep;77(9):565-570. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219654. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Age- and deprivation-related inequalities in identification of people at high risk of type 2 diabetes in England.年龄和贫困相关因素导致的英格兰 2 型糖尿病高危人群识别不平等。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 10;24(1):2166. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19571-x.
3
Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis.转诊至英国国民保健署糖尿病预防计划以及从不伴糖尿病高血糖状态转归为 2 型糖尿病:一项匹配队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(2):e1004177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004177. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Sociodemographic disparities in non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and the transition to type 2 diabetes: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.社会人口统计学差异与非糖尿病高血糖及 2 型糖尿病的转化:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的证据。
Diabet Med. 2020 Sep;37(9):1536-1544. doi: 10.1111/dme.14343. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Assessing the potential return on investment of the proposed UK NHS diabetes prevention programme in different population subgroups: an economic evaluation.评估英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)拟议的糖尿病预防计划在不同人群亚组中的潜在投资回报率:一项经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e014953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014953.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England: qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners and referrers.利益相关者对英格兰国民保健服务糖尿病预防计划的看法和体验:对服务使用者、干预提供者和实施者、委托人和推荐者进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05160-2.
7
Evaluation of community provision of a preventive cardiovascular programme - the National Health Service Health Check in reaching the under-served groups by primary care in England: cross sectional observational study.社区提供预防性心血管疾病项目的评估——英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查通过初级保健覆盖服务不足群体:横断面观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2346-5.
8
Ethnic inequalities in health-related quality of life among older adults in England: secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.英格兰老年人健康相关生活质量的种族不平等:一项全国性横断面调查的二次分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e145-e154. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30287-5. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
Diabetes prevention at scale: Narrative review of findings and lessons from the DIPLOMA evaluation of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in England.大规模糖尿病预防:对英国国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划的文凭评估结果与经验教训的叙述性综述。
Diabet Med. 2023 Nov;40(11):e15209. doi: 10.1111/dme.15209. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
10
The influence of demographic, health and psychosocial factors on patient uptake of the English NHS diabetes prevention programme.人口统计学、健康和心理社会因素对英国国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划患者参与度的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09195-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic disparities in diabetes prevalence among the population in Ireland.爱尔兰人口中糖尿病患病率的社会经济差异。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2206. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23022-6.
2
Age- and deprivation-related inequalities in identification of people at high risk of type 2 diabetes in England.年龄和贫困相关因素导致的英格兰 2 型糖尿病高危人群识别不平等。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 10;24(1):2166. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19571-x.
3
The effectiveness of digital delivery versus group-based face-to-face delivery of the English National Health Service Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme: a non-inferiority retrospective cohort comparison study.

本文引用的文献

1
'Going the distance': an independent cohort study of engagement and dropout among the first 100 000 referrals into a large-scale diabetes prevention program.“持之以恒”:一项针对大规模糖尿病预防计划前 10 万名转诊患者参与和退出情况的独立队列研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001835.
2
Epidemiology and determinants of non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and its conversion to type 2 diabetes mellitus, 2000-2015: cohort population study using UK electronic health records.2000 - 2015年非糖尿病性高血糖及其转化为2型糖尿病的流行病学和决定因素:使用英国电子健康记录的队列人群研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 6;10(9):e040201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040201.
3
数字传递与基于小组的面对面传递在英国国民健康服务 2 型糖尿病预防计划中的效果比较:一项非劣效性回顾性队列比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):1434. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10365-2.
4
Evaluating the Short-Term Costs and Benefits of a Nationwide Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: Retrospective Observational Study.评估英格兰全国糖尿病预防计划的短期成本和效益:回顾性观察研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Nov;21(6):891-903. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00830-8. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
Sociodemographic disparities in non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and the transition to type 2 diabetes: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
社会人口统计学差异与非糖尿病高血糖及 2 型糖尿病的转化:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的证据。
Diabet Med. 2020 Sep;37(9):1536-1544. doi: 10.1111/dme.14343. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
4
Early Outcomes From the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划的早期成果
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):152-160. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1425. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Morbidity and mortality after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance: 30-year results of the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study.生活方式干预对糖耐量受损人群的发病率和死亡率的影响:大庆糖尿病预防结局研究 30 年的结果。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;7(6):452-461. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30093-2. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: referrals, uptake and participant characteristics.《更健康的你:国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:转介、参与率和参与者特征》。
Diabet Med. 2018 Apr;35(4):513-518. doi: 10.1111/dme.13562. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
7
Examining trends in type 2 diabetes incidence, prevalence and mortality in the UK between 2004 and 2014.研究 2004 年至 2014 年期间英国 2 型糖尿病发病率、患病率和死亡率的趋势。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Nov;19(11):1537-1545. doi: 10.1111/dom.12964. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Identification of impaired fasting glucose, healthcare utilization and progression to diabetes in the UK using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).利用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)在英国识别空腹血糖受损、医疗保健利用情况以及糖尿病进展情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):1375-1386. doi: 10.1002/pds.4007. Epub 2016 May 19.
9
Baseline participation in a health examination survey of the population 65 years and older: who is missed and why?65岁及以上人群健康检查调查的基线参与情况:哪些人未被纳入,原因何在?
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jan 19;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0185-6.
10
The National Diabetes Prevention Program: From Research to Reality.国家糖尿病预防计划:从研究到现实
Diabetes Care Educ Newsl. 2012 Summer;33(4):4-7.