• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州和新泽西州择期分娩的趋势。

Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey.

作者信息

Teitler Julien O, Chegwin Valentina, Li Linda, Liu Kayuet, Bearman Peter S, Gorney-Daley Marilyn A, Reichman Nancy E

机构信息

School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

AJPM Focus. 2022 Nov 24;2(1):100052. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052
PMID:37789944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10546565/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cesarean section deliveries in the U.S. increased from 5% of births in 1970 to 32% in 2020. Little is known about trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies (i.e., those for which interventions would not be medically necessary). This study addresses the following questions: (1) what is the prevalence of elective deliveries at the population level?, (2) how has that changed over time?, and (3) to what extent do the rates of elective deliveries vary across the population?

METHODS

We first documented long-term trends in cesarean sections in the U.S., California, and New Jersey. We then used linked birth and hospital discharge records and an algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines to identify low-risk pregnancies and document trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey over a recent 2-decade period, overall and by maternal characteristics and gestational age.

RESULTS

In low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey, rates of cesarean sections and inductions increased sharply from the early 1990s through the mid-2000s, peaked at 33% in California and 41% in New Jersey in 2007, and then declined somewhat, and the proportions of inductions that were followed by cesarean sections increased from fewer than 1 in 5 to about 1 in 4. More education, non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, U.S.-born status, and non-Medicaid were associated with higher rates of interventions. Trends were similar across all socioeconomic groups, but differences have been narrowing in California. Among early-term (gestational age of 37-38 weeks) births in low-risk pregnancies, the rates of elective deliveries increased substantially in both states until the mid/late-2000s, peaked at about 35% in California and over 40% in New Jersey, and then decreased in both states to about 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Given established health risks of nonmedically necessary cesarean sections, that a nontrivial share of induced deliveries in low-risk pregnancies result in cesarean sections, and that interventions in low-risk pregnancies have not substantially declined since their peak in the mid-2000s, the trends documented in this paper suggest that sustained, even increased, public health attention is needed to address the still-too-high rates of cesarean sections and inductions in the U.S.

摘要

引言

美国剖宫产分娩率从1970年占分娩总数的5%上升至2020年的32%。对于低风险妊娠(即那些医学上无需干预的妊娠)中剖宫产和引产的趋势,人们了解甚少。本研究探讨以下问题:(1)在人群层面,择期分娩的发生率是多少?(2)随时间推移有何变化?(3)择期分娩率在人群中的差异程度如何?

方法

我们首先记录了美国、加利福尼亚州和新泽西州剖宫产的长期趋势。然后,我们使用了链接的出生和医院出院记录以及基于联合委员会指南的算法,以识别低风险妊娠,并记录加利福尼亚州和新泽西州在最近20年期间低风险妊娠中剖宫产和引产的趋势,总体情况以及按产妇特征和孕周划分的情况。

结果

在加利福尼亚州和新泽西州的低风险妊娠中,剖宫产和引产率从20世纪90年代初到21世纪中期急剧上升,2007年在加利福尼亚州达到33%的峰值,在新泽西州达到41%的峰值,然后有所下降,且引产后继发剖宫产的比例从不到五分之一增加到约四分之一。更多的教育程度、非西班牙裔白人种族/族裔、在美国出生以及非医疗补助与更高的干预率相关。所有社会经济群体的趋势相似,但在加利福尼亚州,差异一直在缩小。在低风险妊娠的早期(孕周为37 - 38周)分娩中,两个州的择期分娩率在21世纪中期/后期之前都大幅上升,在加利福尼亚州达到约35%的峰值,在新泽西州超过40%的峰值,然后两个州都降至约20%。

结论

鉴于非医学必要剖宫产存在既定的健康风险,低风险妊娠中有相当一部分引产会导致剖宫产,且自21世纪中期达到峰值以来,低风险妊娠中的干预措施并未大幅下降,本文记录的趋势表明,仍需持续甚至加大公共卫生关注力度,以应对美国剖宫产和引产率仍然过高的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/8f0b9fb37c4c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/30b84adc6cc9/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/ba31bb0f84a0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/9be4deac2ec3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/8f0b9fb37c4c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/30b84adc6cc9/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/ba31bb0f84a0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/9be4deac2ec3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/10546565/8f0b9fb37c4c/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey.加利福尼亚州和新泽西州择期分娩的趋势。
AJPM Focus. 2022 Nov 24;2(1):100052. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Elective Deliveries and the Risk of Autism.选择性剖宫产与自闭症风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jul;63(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.01.024. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
3
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
4
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.
5
Elective Deliveries and Neonatal Outcomes in Full-Term Pregnancies.择期分娩与足月妊娠的新生儿结局。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;188(4):674-683. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz014.
6
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
7
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
8
Maternal education and racial/ethnic disparities in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean deliveries in the United States.美国初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产的产妇教育程度与种族/民族差异
AJOG Glob Rep. 2021 Dec 4;2(1):100036. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100036. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Factors Affecting Elective and Non-elective Cesarean Sections: A Multinomial Regression Analysis Using Robson's Classification in a Southeast European Country.影响选择性剖宫产和非选择性剖宫产的因素:在一个东南欧国家使用罗布森分类法进行的多项回归分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 10;16(6):e62038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62038. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Elective Deliveries and the Risk of Autism.选择性剖宫产与自闭症风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jul;63(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.01.024. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Births: Final Data for 2020.出生人数:2020 年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Feb;70(17):1-50.
3
Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.加利福尼亚州初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的医院质量改进干预措施、全州政策倡议
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1631-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3816.
4
Elective Deliveries and Neonatal Outcomes in Full-Term Pregnancies.择期分娩与足月妊娠的新生儿结局。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;188(4):674-683. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz014.
5
Worth the Wait? The Effect of Early Term Birth on Maternal and Infant Health.值得等待吗?早期足月分娩对母婴健康的影响。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2017;36(4):748-72. doi: 10.1002/pam.22014.
6
Births: Final Data for 2015.出生情况:2015年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Jan;66(1):1.
7
Planned Cesarean Delivery at Term and Adverse Outcomes in Childhood Health.足月计划性剖宫产与儿童期健康不良结局
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2271-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16176.
8
Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age.近期按孕周计算的引产率有所下降。
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jun(155):1-8.
9
Source of payment for the delivery: births in a 33-state and District of Columbia reporting area, 2010.分娩支付来源:2010年哥伦比亚特区及33个州报告地区的分娩情况
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 Dec 19;62(5):1-20.
10
Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.预防首次剖宫产:尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国立儿童健康与人类发育研究所、母胎医学学会和美国妇产科学院联合研讨会总结。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1181-93. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182704880.