• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇产科外科医生对非医学指征剖宫产的看法:一项横断面研究。

Perceptions of Obstetrics/Gynecology Surgeons on Non-medically Indicated Cesarean Sections: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Majeed Nasreen G, Mustafa Shakhawan A, Makram Abdelrahman M, Mohammed Paxshan A, Abdul Aziz Jeza M, Mansour Mina M, Qadir Dilsoz M, Arif Ali T, Mahmmod Maryam B, Rasheed Mariwan K, Huy Nguyen Tien

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baxshin Research Center, Baxshin Hospital, Sulaymaniyah, IRQ.

Health Sciences, Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research (KISSR), Sulaymaniyah, IRQ.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44508. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44508. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.44508
PMID:37790072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10544730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous factors can influence decisions regarding the type of delivery of human babies. There is an increasing demand for non-medically indicated cesarean sections (CS) (non-miCS) or CS on request (CSor). Therefore, this survey study aimed to identify the factors that may foster the decision of CS among obstetricians.

METHODS

After the sample size calculation returned with 132 needed participants, confidence surveys were sent electronically or disseminated in paper form to nearly all obstetricians (around 200) in the province between mid-August 2021 and mid-February 2022. After signing the consent form, obstetricians were able to provide responses to the four sections of the questionnaire. Data from the copies of the paper were entered into Excel by a local data collector. The data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) and followed the following sequence: summary statistics were done first; then the groups (for and against non-miCS) were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA); and, finally, regression models were conducted to determine the factors that may affect the favorability of doing non-miCS.

RESULTS

A total of 104 obstetricians responded to the survey. Approximately 62.5% of them performed CSor for women who requested it. In addition, more than half (57.7%) agreed that all women had the right and autonomy to choose their mode of delivery. Most providers (65.4) agreed that fear of vaginal delivery (VD) and a bad experience with it are rational reasons for performing a CSor. Unfortunately, some obstetricians (18.3%) faced lawsuits when they refused to perform CSor. As for the factors that may influence the acceptance of obstetricians to non-miCS, it was found that obstetricians who are unsure or refuse to answer (OR=4.30, 95%-CI 1.25-16.29, p=0.025), along with people who do not always perform CSor (OR=4.33, 95%-CI 1.59-12.50, p=0.005) or even refuse it (3.54, 95%-CI 1.05-12.96, p=0.046), are more likely to agree that women have the right to request CSor.

CONCLUSION

The surge in CSor rates was mostly correlated with an attempt to escape the fear of VD. However, given the wide discrepancies in obstetricians' opinions in this survey, we cannot draw firm conclusions about the reasons behind this phenomenon. It is also important to explore possible ways to address the problem, such as through litigation with providers who refuse to perform a CSor and through economic reform to protect women from money-grubbing obstetricians.

摘要

背景

众多因素会影响人类分娩方式的决策。对非医学指征剖宫产(non-miCS)或按需剖宫产(CSor)的需求日益增加。因此,本调查研究旨在确定可能促使产科医生做出剖宫产决策的因素。

方法

在计算出所需的132名参与者样本量后,于2021年8月中旬至2022年2月中旬以电子方式或纸质形式向该省几乎所有(约200名)产科医生发送了信心调查问卷。签署同意书后,产科医生能够对问卷的四个部分做出回应。纸质问卷副本的数据由当地数据收集员录入Excel。使用统计产品与服务解决方案(SPSS)(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,纽约州阿蒙克)进行数据分析,并遵循以下顺序:首先进行描述性统计;然后使用方差分析(ANOVA)比较两组(支持和反对non-miCS);最后进行回归模型分析以确定可能影响进行non-miCS意愿的因素。

结果

共有104名产科医生回复了调查。其中约62.5%的人会为有需求的女性进行CSor。此外,超过一半(57.7%)的人同意所有女性都有权自主选择分娩方式。大多数提供者(65.4%)认为对阴道分娩(VD)的恐惧以及不愉快的阴道分娩经历是进行CSor的合理理由。不幸的是,一些产科医生(18.3%)在拒绝进行CSor时面临诉讼。至于可能影响产科医生接受non-miCS的因素,发现不确定或拒绝回答的产科医生(OR = 4.30,95%置信区间1.25 - 16.29,p = 0.025),以及不总是进行CSor(OR = 4.33,95%置信区间1.59 - 12.50,p = 0.005)甚至拒绝进行CSor的人(OR = 3.54,95%置信区间1.05 - 12.96,p = 0.046)更有可能同意女性有权要求进行CSor。

结论

CSor率的激增主要与试图逃避对VD的恐惧有关。然而,鉴于本次调查中产科医生的意见存在很大差异,我们无法就此现象背后的原因得出确凿结论。探索解决该问题的可能方法也很重要,例如对拒绝进行CSor的提供者提起诉讼,以及通过经济改革保护女性免受唯利是图的产科医生的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10544730/7de6f7278474/cureus-0015-00000044508-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10544730/f327a740b687/cureus-0015-00000044508-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10544730/7de6f7278474/cureus-0015-00000044508-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10544730/f327a740b687/cureus-0015-00000044508-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10544730/7de6f7278474/cureus-0015-00000044508-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Obstetrics/Gynecology Surgeons on Non-medically Indicated Cesarean Sections: A Cross-Sectional Study.妇产科外科医生对非医学指征剖宫产的看法:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44508. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44508. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.中国两孩政策下剖宫产术后再次试产(TOLAC)的产科医生观点:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03559-1.
3
Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.土耳其产科医生对分娩方式的个人偏好和对产妇要求剖宫产的态度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;284(3):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1682-z. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
4
Chinese obstetricians' attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices related to cesarean delivery on maternal request.中国产科医生在产妇要求剖宫产方面的态度、信念和临床实践。
Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):e67-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.丹麦产科医生对产妇要求下选择性剖宫产的个人偏好和总体态度:一项全国性邮寄调查。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Mar;83(3):262-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Israel: Maternity department policies and obstetricians' perspectives.以色列产妇要求剖宫产:妇产科政策和产科医生的观点。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221125366. doi: 10.1177/17455057221125366.
8
Once a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstetricians' approach to counseling for trial of labor after cesarean.剖宫产一次,就永远要剖宫产吗?产科医生对剖宫产术后试产咨询的处理方式。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Mar 13;2(2):100054. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100054. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Defensive medicine and cesarean sections in Brazil.巴西的防御性医疗和剖腹产。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 8;100(1):e24176. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024176.
10
Turkish obstetricians' self-birth preferences, attitudes and practices towards caesarean section on maternal request and vaginal birth after caesarean section: a national online survey.土耳其产科医生对产妇要求剖宫产和剖宫产术后阴道分娩的自我分娩偏好、态度和实践:一项全国性在线调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):2033-2038. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2080531. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated with Vaginal/Cesarean Birth Attitudes among Medical Students.医学生阴道分娩/剖宫产态度的相关因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 18;10(3):571. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030571.
2
Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Management Challenge.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:诊断与处理的挑战
Cureus. 2021 Apr 13;13(4):e14463. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14463.
3
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).基于共识的调查研究报告清单(CROSS)
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3179-3187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Trends and changes in cesarean delivery rates in Iraq: findings from the multiple indicator cluster surveys, 2011-2018.伊拉克剖宫产率的趋势和变化:2011-2018 年多指标群集调查结果。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6272-6277. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1910664. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
5
Why do pregnant women prefer cesarean birth? A qualitative study in a tertiary care center in Southern Thailand.为什么孕妇更喜欢剖宫产?泰国南部一家三级护理中心的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03525-3.
6
Quality of medicines for life-threatening pregnancy complications in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家危及生命的妊娠并发症药物质量:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0236060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236060. eCollection 2020.
7
Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study.埃及剖宫产的医学和非医学原因:一项基于医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2558-2.
8
Pregnancy-specific anxiety and elective cesarean section in primiparas: A cohort study in China.孕妇特定焦虑与初产妇选择性剖宫产术:中国的一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216870. eCollection 2019.
9
Chinese obstetricians' attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices related to cesarean delivery on maternal request.中国产科医生在产妇要求剖宫产方面的态度、信念和临床实践。
Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):e67-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
10
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.