• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国两孩政策下剖宫产术后再次试产(TOLAC)的产科医生观点:一项横断面研究。

Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.

The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03559-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-03559-1
PMID:33509100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7841882/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the birth policy has been adjusted from one-child-one-couple to universal two-child-one-couple in China, there is an increasing number of women undergoing a second pregnancy after a previous cesarean section (CS). Undertaking an elective repeat CS (ERCS) has been taken for granted and has thus become a major contributor to the increasing CS rate in China. Promoting trial of labor after CS (TOLAC) can reduce the CS rate without compromising delivery outcomes. This study aimed to investigate Chinese obstetricians' perspectives regarding TOLAC, and the factors associated with their decision-making regarding recommending TOLAC to pregnant women with a history of CS under the two-child policy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out between May and July 2018. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with the obstetricians' intention to recommend TOLAC to pregnant women with a history of CS. The independent variables included sociodemographic factors and perceptions regarding TOLAC (selection criteria for TOLAC, basis underlying the selection criteria for TOLAC, and perceived challenges regarding promoting TOLAC).

RESULTS

A total of 426 obstetricians were surveyed, with a response rate of ≥83%. The results showed that 31.0% of the obstetricians had no intention to recommend TOLAC to pregnant women with a history of CS. Their decisions were associated with the perceived lack of confidence regarding undergoing TOLAC among pregnant women with a history of CS and their families (odds ratio [OR] = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.38-1.38); obstetricians' uncertainty about the safety of TOLAC for pregnant women with a history of CS (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27-0.96), and worries about medical lawsuits due to adverse delivery outcomes (OR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.07-0.31). The main reported challenges regarding performing TOLAC were lack of clear guidelines for predicting or avoiding the risks associated with TOLAC (83.4%), obstetricians' uncertainty about the safety of TOLAC for women with a history of CS (81.2%), pregnant women's unwillingness to accept the risks associated with TOLAC (81.0%) or demand for ERCS (80.7%), and the perceived lack of confidence (77.5%) or understanding (69.7%) regarding undergoing TOLAC among pregnant women and their families.

CONCLUSION

A proportion of Chinese obstetricians did not intend to recommend TOLAC to pregnant women with a history of CS. This phenomenon was closely associated with obstetricians' concerns about TOLAC safety and perceived attitudes of the pregnant women and their families regarding TOLAC. Effective measures are needed to help obstetricians predict and reduce the risks associated with TOLAC, clearly specify the indications for TOLAC, improve labor management, and popularize TOLAC in China. Additionally, public health education on TOLAC is necessary to improve the understanding of TOLAC among pregnant women with a history of CS and their families, and to improve their interactions with their obstetricians regarding shared decision making.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94a3/7841882/ee11a0085074/12884_2021_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94a3/7841882/ee11a0085074/12884_2021_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94a3/7841882/ee11a0085074/12884_2021_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

随着中国生育政策从一孩一夫妻调整为普遍二孩一夫妻,越来越多的妇女在剖宫产后再次怀孕。选择择期再次剖宫产(ERCS)已被视为理所当然,因此成为中国剖宫产率上升的主要原因。提倡剖宫产后试产(TOLAC)可以降低剖宫产率,而不会影响分娩结局。本研究旨在调查中国产科医生对 TOLAC 的看法,以及与他们决定在二孩政策下向有剖宫产史的孕妇推荐 TOLAC 相关的因素。

方法

2018 年 5 月至 7 月进行了横断面调查。使用二元逻辑回归确定与产科医生向有剖宫产史的孕妇推荐 TOLAC 的意愿相关的因素。自变量包括社会人口统计学因素和对 TOLAC 的看法(TOLAC 的选择标准、选择标准的基础以及促进 TOLAC 面临的挑战)。

结果

共调查了 426 名产科医生,应答率≥83%。结果显示,31.0%的产科医生不打算向有剖宫产史的孕妇推荐 TOLAC。他们的决定与孕妇及其家属对有剖宫产史的孕妇进行 TOLAC 的信心不足有关(比值比[OR] = 2.31;95%可信区间:1.38-1.38);产科医生对有剖宫产史的孕妇进行 TOLAC 的安全性不确定(OR = 0.49;95%可信区间:0.27-0.96),以及担心因不良分娩结局而引起医疗诉讼(OR = 0.14;95%可信区间:0.07-0.31)。进行 TOLAC 主要报告的挑战是缺乏明确的指南来预测或避免与 TOLAC 相关的风险(83.4%)、产科医生对有剖宫产史的妇女进行 TOLAC 的安全性不确定(81.2%)、孕妇不愿意接受与 TOLAC 相关的风险(81.0%)或对 ERCS 的需求(80.7%),以及孕妇及其家属对 TOLAC 的信心不足(77.5%)或理解不足(69.7%)。

结论

中国有一定比例的产科医生不打算向有剖宫产史的孕妇推荐 TOLAC。这种现象与产科医生对 TOLAC 安全性的担忧以及孕妇及其家属对 TOLAC 的态度密切相关。需要采取有效措施帮助产科医生预测和降低 TOLAC 相关风险,明确 TOLAC 的适应证,改善分娩管理,并在中国推广 TOLAC。此外,需要对有剖宫产史的孕妇及其家属进行 TOLAC 的公共卫生教育,提高他们对 TOLAC 的理解,并改善他们与产科医生在共同决策方面的互动。

相似文献

1
Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.中国两孩政策下剖宫产术后再次试产(TOLAC)的产科医生观点:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03559-1.
2
Chinese obstetricians' attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices related to cesarean delivery on maternal request.中国产科医生在产妇要求剖宫产方面的态度、信念和临床实践。
Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):e67-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
Reasons for previous Cesarean deliveries impact a woman's independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean.既往剖宫产原因影响产妇分娩方式的独立决策和再次剖宫产试产的成功率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2833-2.
4
Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study.有既往剖宫产史的产妇因引产失败或产程阻滞而行试产的成功率:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 20;19(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2334-3.
5
Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.剖宫产术后有既往阴道手术分娩失败史的妇女试产结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):49.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
6
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
7
Trial of labor versus elective cesarean delivery for patients with two prior cesarean sections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对于有两次剖宫产史的患者,试产与选择性剖宫产的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024 Dec;37(1):2326301. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2326301. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.女性对剖宫产后试产和选择性重复剖宫产手术过程和结果的偏好。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Aug;28(8):1143-1152. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7362. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
[Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].[剖宫产术后阴道分娩的影响因素及产前评估]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 25;54(6):369-374. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.06.003.
10
Socio-cultural and clinician determinants in the maternal decision-making process in the choice for trial of labor vs. elective repeated cesarean section: a questionnaire comparison between Italian settings.社会文化和临床医生因素对产妇选择试产与选择性重复剖宫产决策过程的影响:意大利环境下的问卷调查比较。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Aug 27;47(6):656-664. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0041.

引用本文的文献

1
Duration time of labor progression for pregnant women of vaginal birth after cesarean in Hubei, China.中国湖北省阴道分娩后剖宫产孕妇的产程时间。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;193(3):1351-1358. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03600-6. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Development of a multivariate predictive nomogram among women with antepartum fetal death diagnosed at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation for outcome of TOLAC.孕34周及以上诊断为产前胎儿死亡的女性中,用于预测经阴道分娩成功率(TOLAC)结局的多变量预测列线图的开发。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07264-6. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior Cesarean section in Baghdad.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean: Using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden.预测既往剖宫产术后的阴道分娩:使用机器学习模型和瑞典的基于人群队列。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Mar;100(3):513-520. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14020. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2018.中国 2008-2018 年剖宫产率的变化趋势。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 7;323(1):89-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17595.
3
Uterine scar rupture - Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management.子宫瘢痕破裂——预测、预防、诊断与处理。
巴格达有过一次剖宫产史的青少年孕妇的母婴结局
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023 Jun 7;24(2):86-91. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-7-11. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Evaluation of Cesarean Rates for Term, Singleton, Live Vertex Deliveries in China in 2020 Among Women With No Prior Cesarean Delivery.2020 年中国无剖宫产史的足月、单胎、头位活产产妇的剖宫产率评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4521.
5
Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05396-w.
6
Pro-lactation cesarean section: Immediate skin-to-skin contact and its influence on prolonged breastfeeding.促进泌乳剖宫产:母婴皮肤接触及其对延长母乳喂养的影响。
Front Sociol. 2022 Sep 27;7:908811. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.908811. eCollection 2022.
7
Association between the second-stage duration of labor and perinatal outcomes in women with a prior cesarean delivery.有剖宫产史的产妇产程第二阶段持续时间与围生结局的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04871-0.
8
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case-control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.剖宫产术后试产成功的预测因素:埃塞俄比亚东部公立医院的巢式病例对照研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211061960. doi: 10.1177/17455065211061960.
9
The urological complications of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) - a literature review.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩(VBAC)的泌尿系统并发症——文献综述
J Med Life. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):443-447. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0219.
10
Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section.评估预测剖宫产术后试产成功率的因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 24;21(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04004-z.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;59:115-131. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第 205 号:剖宫产后的阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.
5
Perspectives, Decision Making, and Final Mode of Delivery in Pregnant Women With a Previous C-Section in a General Hospital in Peru: Prospective Analysis.秘鲁一家综合医院既往有剖宫产史孕妇的分娩视角、决策制定及最终分娩方式:前瞻性分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Aug 8;2(2):2381468317724409. doi: 10.1177/2381468317724409. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec.
6
Decision-making during trial of labour after caesarean; a qualitative study with gynaecologists.剖宫产术后分娩试验期间的决策制定:一项对妇科医生的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 18;13(7):e0199887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199887. eCollection 2018.
7
Epidural analgesia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC): a significant adjunct to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)时的硬膜外镇痛:剖宫产术后成功阴道分娩(VBAC)的重要辅助手段。
J Perinat Med. 2018 Apr 25;46(3):261-269. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0382.
8
Vaginal birth after cesarean section-The world trend and local experience in Taiwan.剖宫产术后阴道分娩——全球趋势及台湾地区的本土经验
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;56(1):41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.03.007.
9
Trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) is associated with increased risk for instrumental delivery.剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)与器械助产分娩风险增加相关。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan;37(1):44-47. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1209167. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.比较引产与择期再次剖宫产的经济学评估:一项系统评价
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.738. Epub 2016 Nov 11.