文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

加强卫生领域的多部门合作:作为弥合知识转化差距模式的公共卫生开放平台。

Enhancing multi-sectoral collaboration in health: the open arena for public health as a model for bridging the knowledge-translation gap.

作者信息

Pradier Christian, Balinska Marta A, Bailly Laurent

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Nice University Hospital, University of Côte D'Azur, Nice, France.

Clinical Research Unit (UR2CA), Nice University Hospital, University of Côte D'Azur, Nice, France.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2023 Sep 18;3:1216234. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1216234. eCollection 2023.


DOI:10.3389/frhs.2023.1216234
PMID:37790087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10544995/
Abstract

Effective public health interventions at local level must involve communities and stakeholders beyond the health services spectrum. A dedicated venue for structured discussion will ensure ongoing multi-sectoral collaboration more effectively than convening meetings. Such a venue can be created using existing resources, at minimal extra cost. The University Hospital in Nice (France) has established an Open Arena for Public Health which can serve as a model for promoting collaborative partnerships at local level. The Arena has been successful in implementing sustainable interventions thanks to a set of principles, including: non-hierarchical governance and operating, fair representation of stakeholders, consensus as to best available evidence internationally and locally, policy dialogues: open, free-flowing discussions without preconceived solutions, and an experimental approach to interventions.

摘要

地方层面有效的公共卫生干预措施必须让社区和卫生服务领域以外的利益相关者参与进来。一个专门用于进行结构化讨论的场所,比召开会议更能有效地确保持续的多部门合作。利用现有资源,只需花费极少的额外成本就能创建这样一个场所。法国尼斯大学医院设立了一个公共卫生开放论坛,它可作为在地方层面促进合作伙伴关系的典范。由于遵循了一系列原则,该论坛成功实施了可持续干预措施,这些原则包括:非等级制治理与运作、利益相关者的公平代表性、就国际和地方最佳现有证据达成共识、政策对话:进行开放、自由交流且无先入为主解决方案的讨论,以及采用实验性干预方法。

相似文献

[1]
Enhancing multi-sectoral collaboration in health: the open arena for public health as a model for bridging the knowledge-translation gap.

Front Health Serv. 2023-9-18

[2]
Inclusion strategies in multi-stakeholder dialogues: The case of a community-based participatory research on immunization in Nigeria.

PLoS One. 2022

[3]
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?

Med J Aust. 2021-5

[4]
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Early Hum Dev. 2020-11

[5]
Alcohol policies in Malawi: inclusion of WHO "best buy" interventions and use of multi-sectoral action.

BMC Public Health. 2018-8-15

[6]
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.

Qatar Med J. 2019-11-7

[7]
Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative.

Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016-6

[8]
A population-based approach to integrated healthcare delivery: a scoping review of clinical care and public health collaboration.

BMC Public Health. 2019-6-7

[9]
Bridging barriers to advance multisector approaches to improve food security, nutrition and population health in Nepal: transdisciplinary perspectives.

BMC Public Health. 2019-7-18

[10]
Moving toward a common goal via cross-sector collaboration: lessons learned from SARS to COVID-19 in Singapore.

Global Health. 2022-9-21

引用本文的文献

[1]
Multisectoral coordination in public health: insights from the 8th EMPHNET regional conference.

Front Public Health. 2025-7-30

[2]
Enhancing Intersectoral Collaboration in Maternal Healthcare for the Realization of Universal Health Coverage in Kenya: The Perspectives of Health Facility Administrators in Kilifi County, Kenya.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025-4-14

[3]
Improving the health of the rural population in India through bundling WASH practices.

Front Health Serv. 2025-2-19

本文引用的文献

[1]
Factors influencing participation in breast cancer screening in an urban setting. A study of organized and individual opportunistic screening among potentially active and retired women in the city of Nice.

Prev Med Rep. 2022-12-6

[2]
An ethical analysis of policy dialogues.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2023-1-27

[3]
Participatory research in health promotion: a critical review and illustration of rationales.

Health Promot Int. 2022-6-23

[4]
Enhancing the capacity of the mental health and substance use health workforce to meet population needs: insights from a facilitated virtual policy dialogue.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2022-5-7

[5]
Policy dialogue and participation: a new way of crafting a national health financing strategy in Morocco.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2020-9-29

[6]
Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic.

Lancet. 2020-9-26

[7]
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2020-5-25

[8]
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.

Annu Rev Public Health. 2020-4-2

[9]
Impact of improved urban environment and coaching on physical condition and quality of life in elderly women: a controlled study.

Eur J Public Health. 2018-9-17

[10]
Collaborative Governance the Key to Improving Community Health.

Trustee. 2016

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索