政策对话的伦理分析。
An ethical analysis of policy dialogues.
机构信息
Centre for Public Policy Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
出版信息
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 27;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00962-2.
BACKGROUND
A policy dialogue is a tool which promotes evidence-informed policy-making. It involves deliberation about a high-priority issue, informed by a synthesis of the best-available evidence, where potential policy interventions are discussed by stakeholders. We offer an ethical analysis of policy dialogues - an argument about how policy dialogues ought to be conceived and executed - to guide those organizing and participating in policy dialogues. Our analysis focuses on the deliberative dialogues themselves, rather than ethical issues in the broader policy context within which they are situated.
METHODS
We conduct a philosophical conceptual analysis of policy dialogues, informed by a formal and an interpretative literature review.
RESULTS
We identify the objectives of policy dialogues, and consider the procedural and substantive values that should govern them. As knowledge translation tools, the chief objective of policy dialogues is to ensure that prospective evidence-informed health policies are appropriate for and likely to support evidence-informed decision-making in a particular context. We identify five core characteristics which serve this objective: policy dialogues are (i) focused on a high-priority issue, (ii) evidence-informed, (iii) deliberative, (iv) participatory and (v) action-oriented. In contrast to dominant ethical frameworks for policy-making, we argue that transparency and accountability are not central procedural values for policy dialogues, as they are liable to inhibit the open deliberation that is necessary for successful policy dialogues. Instead, policy dialogues are legitimate insofar as they pursue the objectives and embody the core characteristics identified above. Finally, we argue that good policy dialogues need to actively consider a range of substantive values other than health benefit and equity.
CONCLUSIONS
Policy dialogues should recognize the limits of effectiveness as a guiding value for policy-making, and operate with an expansive conception of successful outcomes. We offer a set of questions to support those organizing and participating in policy dialogues.
背景
政策对话是一种促进循证决策的工具。它涉及到对一个高优先级问题的审议,该问题是根据对最佳现有证据的综合分析得出的,其中利益相关者讨论了潜在的政策干预措施。我们提供了对政策对话的伦理分析——关于政策对话应该如何被构想和执行的论点——以指导那些组织和参与政策对话的人。我们的分析侧重于审议性对话本身,而不是它们所处的更广泛政策背景中的伦理问题。
方法
我们对政策对话进行了哲学概念分析,这得益于正式和解释性文献综述。
结果
我们确定了政策对话的目标,并考虑了应该指导它们的程序和实质性价值。作为知识转化工具,政策对话的主要目标是确保有前景的循证卫生政策适合并有可能支持特定背景下的循证决策。我们确定了五个核心特征,这些特征服务于这一目标:政策对话是(i)针对一个高优先级问题,(ii)循证,(iii)审议性,(iv)参与性和(v)面向行动的。与主导的政策制定伦理框架相反,我们认为透明度和问责制不是政策对话的核心程序价值,因为它们可能会抑制成功政策对话所需的公开审议。相反,政策对话是合法的,只要它们追求上述目标并体现核心特征。最后,我们认为,良好的政策对话需要积极考虑除健康效益和公平之外的一系列实质性价值。
结论
政策对话应该认识到有效性作为政策制定指导价值的局限性,并以成功结果的扩展概念来运作。我们提供了一系列问题,以支持那些组织和参与政策对话的人。