Biella Marco, Orrù Graziella, Ciacchini Rebecca, Conversano Ciro, Marazziti Donatella, Gemignani Angelo
Psychology Institute, Heidelberg University, Haupt Str. 47, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, via Savi 10 Pisa, Italy.
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2023 Aug;20(4):252-263. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230404.
The present study explores, retrospectively, the link between anti-vaccination attitude and vaccination intentions and extends this relationship to the effect of media consumption style on attitude.
Generalized linear mixed-models were used to estimate vaccination intentions (related to each of the four available vaccines at the time of the survey) relying on anti-vaccination attitude measured using the Italian translation of the Vaccination Attitude Examination (VAX) scale. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate which media type and which consumption frequency were responsible for variation in the anti-vaccination attitude.
Greater anti-vaccination attitude led to lower vaccination intention (b=-8.33, p<.0001) confirming the attitude-intention link. Crucially, consuming vaccination related information via printed press weekly (b=-0.74, p=.0001) or daily (b=-0.96, p<.0001) were the only protective factors against developing anti-vaccination attitudes. On the other hand, discussing vaccination with the family physician weekly (b=0.66, p=.002) or even daily (b=0.52, p=.026), and actively looking for vaccination related information on specialized websites and blogs every day (b=0.64, t=2.78, p=.006) were risk factors related to increased anti-vaccination attitude. No effects of social media on anti-vaccination attitude were found.
The results confirm that vaccination intentions can be linked to the underlying anti-vaccination attitude. Moreover, our results suggest that the web and the blog sphere, but not social media, are the most anti-vaccination fuelling media and that health practitioners engage with the most vaccination-hesitant individuals. Further interventions could leverage these insights to tackle the vaccination hesitancy issue.
本研究通过回顾性分析,探究反疫苗态度与疫苗接种意愿之间的联系,并将这种关系扩展至媒体消费方式对态度的影响。
采用广义线性混合模型,依据使用疫苗接种态度调查(VAX)量表意大利语译本测得的反疫苗态度,估计疫苗接种意愿(与调查时可用的四种疫苗中的每一种相关)。使用多元线性回归估计哪种媒体类型和哪种消费频率导致了反疫苗态度的变化。
更强的反疫苗态度导致更低的疫苗接种意愿(b = -8.33,p <.0001),证实了态度与意愿之间的联系。至关重要的是,每周(b = -0.74,p =.0001)或每天(b = -0.96,p <.0001)通过印刷媒体获取疫苗接种相关信息是防止形成反疫苗态度的唯一保护因素。另一方面,每周(b = 0.66,p =.002)甚至每天(b = 0.52,p =.026)与家庭医生讨论疫苗接种,以及每天在专业网站和博客上积极查找疫苗接种相关信息(b = 0.64,t = 2.78,p =.006)是与反疫苗态度增加相关的风险因素。未发现社交媒体对反疫苗态度有影响。
结果证实疫苗接种意愿可与潜在的反疫苗态度相关联。此外,我们的结果表明,网络和博客领域而非社交媒体是助长反疫苗态度的最主要媒体,并且健康从业者与最犹豫是否接种疫苗的个体接触。进一步的干预措施可利用这些见解来解决疫苗接种犹豫问题。