• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算的 panel reactive antibodies 的肾移植等待时间:巴西南部中心的经验。

Waiting time for kidney transplantation based on calculated panel reactive antibodies: experience of a southern Brazilian center.

机构信息

Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bras Nefrol. 2024 Jan-Mar;46(1):79-84. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0132en.

DOI:10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0132en
PMID:37791791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10962418/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the waiting list for kidney transplantation in our hospital according to candidate's panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and its outcomes.

METHODS

One thousand six hundred forty patients who were on the waiting list between 2015 and 2019 were included. For the analysis, hazard ratios (HR) for transplant were estimated by Fine and Gray's regression model according to panel reactivity and HR for graft loss and death after transplantation.

RESULTS

The mean age was 45.39 ± 18.22 years. Male gender was predominant (61.2%), but the proportion decreased linearly with the increase in cPRA (p < 0.001). The distribution of patients according to panels were: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), and ≥ 85% (n = 226). Transplantation was achieved in 85.5% of the sample within a median time of 8 months (CI 95%: 6.9 - 9.1). The estimated HRs for transplantation during the follow-up were 2.84 (95% CI: 2.51 - 3.34), 2.41(95%CI: 2.07 - 2.80), and 2.45(95%CI: 2.08 - 2.90) in the cPRA range of 0%, 1%-49%, and 50%-84%, respectively, compared to cPRA ≥ 85 (p < 0.001). After transplantation, the HR for graft loss was similar in the different cPRA groups, but the HR for death (0.46 95% CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022) was lower in the 0% cPRA group when adjusted for age, gender, and presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA).

CONCLUSION

Patients with cPRA below 85% are more than twice as likely to receive a kidney transplantation with a shorter waiting time. The risk of graft loss after transplantation was similar in the different cPRA groups, and the adjusted risk of death was lower in nonsensitized recipients.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在根据候选者的 panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) 及其结果分析我院的肾移植候补者名单。

方法

纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年期间在候补名单上的 1640 名患者。为了分析,根据面板反应性,通过 Fine 和 Gray 的回归模型估计了移植的风险比 (HR),并估计了移植后移植物丢失和死亡的 HR。

结果

平均年龄为 45.39 ± 18.22 岁。男性为主(61.2%),但随着 cPRA 的增加,比例呈线性下降(p < 0.001)。根据面板对患者的分布情况如下:0%(n = 390)、1% - 49%(n = 517)、50% - 84%(n = 269)和≥ 85%(n = 226)。在中位时间为 8 个月(95%CI:6.9-9.1)内,85.5%的样本进行了移植。在随访期间,cPRA 为 0%、1%-49%和 50%-84%时,与 cPRA≥85%相比,移植的估计 HR 分别为 2.84(95%CI:2.51-3.34)、2.41(95%CI:2.07-2.80)和 2.45(95%CI:2.08-2.90)(p < 0.001)。移植后,不同 cPRA 组之间移植物丢失的 HR 相似,但在调整年龄、性别和供体特异性抗体 (DSA) 后,0% cPRA 组的死亡 HR(0.46 95%CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022)较低。

结论

cPRA 低于 85%的患者接受肾移植的可能性是 cPRA 高于 85%的患者的两倍多,等待时间更短。不同 cPRA 组之间移植后移植物丢失的风险相似,未致敏受者的调整后死亡风险较低。

相似文献

1
Waiting time for kidney transplantation based on calculated panel reactive antibodies: experience of a southern Brazilian center.基于计算的 panel reactive antibodies 的肾移植等待时间:巴西南部中心的经验。
J Bras Nefrol. 2024 Jan-Mar;46(1):79-84. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0132en.
2
Calculated panel-reactive antibody predicts outcomes on the heart transplant waiting list.计算性面板反应性抗体可预测心脏移植等待名单上的结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jul;36(7):787-796. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Allocating Deceased Donor Kidneys to Candidates with High Panel-Reactive Antibodies.将已故捐赠者的肾脏分配给高群体反应性抗体的候选者。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):505-11. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07720715. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
4
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新的肾脏分配系统下最优质量肾脏的分配与移植结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Impact of organ prioritization for immunologic sensitization and waiting times for heart transplantation.免疫致敏和心脏移植等待时间对器官优先排序的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Mar;38(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Parsing the 100% calculated panel reactive antibody kidney transplant candidates: Who gets transplanted?剖析100%计算得出的群体反应性抗体肾移植候选者:谁能接受移植?
HLA. 2020 Jan;95(1):23-29. doi: 10.1111/tan.13692. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
7
Increased Calculated Panel Reactive Antigen Is Associated With Increased Waitlist Time and Mortality in Lung Transplantation.计算性 panel reactive antigen 升高与肺移植等待时间延长和死亡率升高相关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.061. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
8
Posttransplant Outcomes for cPRA-100% Recipients Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新肾脏分配系统下 cPRA-100% 受者的移植后结局。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):1456-1461. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002989.
9
Donor Specificity but Not Broadness of Sensitization Is Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Renal Allograft Recipients.供者特异性而非广泛致敏与肾移植受者的抗体介导排斥反应和移植物丢失相关。
Am J Transplant. 2017 Aug;17(8):2092-2102. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14247. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
10
The Introduction of cPRA and Its Impact on Access to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients in Australia.cPRA 的引入及其对澳大利亚高致敏患者获得已故供体肾移植的影响。
Transplantation. 2021 Jun 1;105(6):1317-1325. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003410.

本文引用的文献

1
Pretransplant Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody in the Absence of Donor-Specific Antibody and Kidney Allograft Survival.移植前无供体特异性抗体时的计算性面板反应抗体与肾移植存活率。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):275-283. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13640820. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Late impact of preformed anti-HLA antibodies on kidney graft outcome.预先形成的抗人白细胞抗原抗体对肾移植结局的晚期影响。
Transpl Immunol. 2019 Aug;55:101212. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
3
Portuguese calculated panel reactive antibodies online estimator.葡萄牙语计算的面板反应性抗体在线估算器。
HLA. 2019 Jun;93(6):445-450. doi: 10.1111/tan.13516. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Positive Luminex and negative flow cytometry in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肾移植中 Luminex 阳性和流式细胞术阴性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):1950-1960. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy349.
5
Approach to the Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidate.高度致敏肾移植受者的处理方法
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):684-93. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05930615. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator.在加拿大cPRA计算器中,cPRA随DQA、DPA和DPB不可接受抗原增加而升高。
Am J Transplant. 2015 Dec;15(12):3194-201. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13355. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
7
Peak panel reactive antibody, cancer, graft, and patient outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者的峰值群体反应性抗体、癌症、移植及患者预后
Transplantation. 2015 May;99(5):1043-50. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000469.
8
[Pitfalls in interpreting anti-HLA antibodies by Luminex technology].[应用Luminex技术解读抗HLA抗体时的陷阱]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2014 Mar-Apr;72(2):178-84. doi: 10.1684/abc.2014.0940.
9
[Geographic disparities in organ transplantation in Brazil].[巴西器官移植的地理差异]
Cad Saude Publica. 2010 Apr;26(4):786-96. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2010000400020.
10
Review article: Luminex technology for HLA antibody detection in organ transplantation.综述文章:用于器官移植中HLA抗体检测的Luminex技术
Nephrology (Carlton). 2009 Apr;14(2):247-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.01074.x.