Chua Kyra Y L, Yang May, Wong Lillian, Knox James, Lee Lai-Yang
Department of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Vic, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Vic, Australia.
Department of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Vic, Australia.
Pathology. 2023 Dec;55(7):1013-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
The aim of this study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates collected prospectively from urine specimens over a 2-month period from September to October 2022 at a single centre in Melbourne, Australia. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. All isolates underwent phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and VITEK2, and mecA polymerase chain reaction. A total of 302 S. saprophyticus isolates from 298 patients were included in this study. Most specimens (91.1%) were referred by community general practitioners from non-hospitalised patients. Antimicrobial resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics was uncommon; trimethoprim susceptibility was 97%; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 98%; nitrofurantoin, 100%; and ciprofloxacin, 100% (100% ciprofloxacin susceptible, increased exposure by EUCAST breakpoints). Methicillin resistance (by mecA detection) was the most common form of urinary antibiotic resistance at 5.6%. VITEK2 susceptibility testing for methicillin resistance had a poor specificity of 61.8% (95% CI 55.8-67.4%) compared to mecA detection. These findings indicate that empiric antibiotic recommendations of trimethoprim, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nitrofurantoin for treatment of urinary S. saprophyticus remain appropriate.
本研究的目的是描述2022年9月至10月在澳大利亚墨尔本的一个单一中心,前瞻性收集的尿标本中临床腐生葡萄球菌分离株的抗生素敏感性。通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)进行菌种鉴定。所有分离株均按照欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)和临床及实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指南以及VITEK2,通过纸片扩散法进行表型抗生素敏感性试验,并进行mecA聚合酶链反应。本研究共纳入了来自298例患者的302株腐生葡萄球菌分离株。大多数标本(91.1%)由社区全科医生从非住院患者中送检。对非β-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药性并不常见;甲氧苄啶敏感性为97%;甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑为98%;呋喃妥因 为100%;环丙沙星为100%(按照EUCAST标准,100%对环丙沙星敏感,暴露增加)。耐甲氧西林(通过mecA检测)是最常见的泌尿系统抗生素耐药形式,为5.6%。与mecA检测相比,VITEK2对耐甲氧西林的敏感性试验特异性较差,为61.8%(95%可信区间55.8-67.4%)。这些发现表明,对于泌尿系统腐生葡萄球菌感染,经验性使用甲氧苄啶、甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑和呋喃妥因进行抗生素治疗仍然是合适的。