Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Street, Ratchtevi District, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Oct 5;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01272-8.
Despite continuously growing, palliative care in Thailand still needs further development. Many family physicians provide various levels of palliative care. However, there is no information regarding what aspects of palliative care family practitioners provide and how much confidence they have. This study aims to identify gaps between expected care domains and provided care and to reveal the domains in which family physicians are less confident.
This study is a cross-sectional survey study. An online questionnaire was publicly published to recruit target participants, Thai family physicians who have received formal residency training and actively practice medicine. The estimated number of actively practising family physicians was 540 persons. Participants were asked which palliative care domains they provide and to rate their confidence in each. A narrative analysis was performed using two relevant frameworks.
One hundred and seven responses were received. Forty-six per cent of participants have no further training in palliative care other than during their residency programs. At least 63.6 per cent of participants provide palliative care two half-day per week or less. Grief and spiritual care enjoyed the least percentage of the participant's responses regarding provided care. These two domains also received the lowest percentage of confidence in providing care from the participants.
Though they are considered essential domains, there are gaps between expected care and actual care in grief management and spiritual care. Grief and bereavement care are mentioned in the residency curriculum; nonetheless, there is an inconsistency regarding spiritual care. Increasing access to continuous education and integrating it into curriculums should be considered to reduce the gaps. Additionally, a national guideline regarding levels of palliative care and the roles of family physicians will benefit from establishing comprehensive palliative care programmes.
尽管姑息治疗在泰国不断发展,但仍需要进一步发展。许多家庭医生提供不同层次的姑息治疗。然而,目前尚不清楚家庭医生提供了哪些姑息治疗方面的服务,以及他们的信心程度如何。本研究旨在确定预期护理领域与实际提供的护理之间的差距,并揭示家庭医生信心较低的领域。
本研究为横断面调查研究。我们公开在线发布了一份问卷,以招募目标参与者,即接受过正规住院医师培训并积极行医的泰国家庭医生。估计有 540 名活跃行医的家庭医生。参与者被要求提供他们提供的姑息治疗领域,并对每个领域的信心进行评分。使用两个相关框架进行叙述性分析。
共收到 107 份回复。46%的参与者除了在住院医师培训期间外,没有接受过其他姑息治疗方面的进一步培训。至少有 63.6%的参与者每周提供两次或更少的半天姑息治疗。在提供的姑息治疗中,悲伤和精神关怀的比例最低。这两个领域也获得了参与者提供护理的信心的最低百分比。
尽管这些领域被认为是必不可少的,但在悲伤管理和精神关怀方面,预期护理和实际护理之间存在差距。悲伤和丧亲护理在住院医师课程中有所提及,但精神关怀方面存在不一致。应该考虑增加获得继续教育的机会,并将其纳入课程,以缩小差距。此外,制定全面的姑息治疗方案,制定关于姑息治疗水平和家庭医生角色的国家指南将从中受益。