State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cleft Lip and Palate Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Jiblah University for Medical and Health Sciences, Ibb, Yemen.
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role.
A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted using porcine tongue simulators and 3D-printed simulators. This workshop consisted of a didactic session followed by a hands-on simulation session. Each participant independently used both simulators to perform Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, which was assessed and scored by senior cleft surgeons using a scoring system including organizational flexibility and ductility, anatomical design simulation, proper incision, proper suturing, and convenience of operation. A paired t test was used for data statistical analysis and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference.
All senior cleft surgeons strongly agreed that the simulation-based workshop was a valuable learning experience, and both simulators were useful and easy to manipulate (P = 1.00). The results of this comparative study showed that a porcine tongue palatoplasty simulator had an effectively significant difference in terms of organizational flexibility and ductility (P = 0.04), and suturing was better than the 3D-printed palatoplasty simulator (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the simulators regarding anatomical design simulation (P = 0.76) and incision simulation (P = 0.65).
Both porcine tongue simulator and 3D-printed simulator have their unique strengths in surgical education for palatoplasty. Thus, the combined use of a porcine tongue and a 3D-printed cleft palate simulators are efficient as an educational model to practice Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty. The porcine tongue simulators are superior in terms of organizational flexibility, ductility, and suturing simulators, while with the 3D-printed simulator, various palatoplasty techniques can be repeatedly practiced with better-simulated face and oral cavity.
本研究旨在评估猪舌在腭裂修补术模拟方面的效率,并与 3D 打印模拟器及其手术教育作用进行比较。
共有 18 名资深腭裂外科医生参加了一个基于猪舌模拟器和 3D 打印模拟器的腭裂修补术模拟研讨会。该研讨会包括一个理论课环节,随后是一个实践模拟环节。每位参与者都独立使用这两种模拟器进行 Furlow 双反对 Z 成形术,由资深腭裂外科医生使用评分系统对其进行评估和评分,该评分系统包括组织灵活性和柔韧性、解剖设计模拟、切口适当、缝合恰当以及操作便利性。采用配对 t 检验进行数据分析,P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
所有资深腭裂外科医生都强烈认为基于模拟的研讨会是一次有价值的学习经历,两种模拟器都很有用且易于操作(P=1.00)。这项比较研究的结果表明,猪舌腭裂修补术模拟器在组织灵活性和柔韧性方面具有显著差异(P=0.04),并且在缝合方面优于 3D 打印腭裂修补术模拟器(P<0.01)。在解剖设计模拟(P=0.76)和切口模拟(P=0.65)方面,两种模拟器之间没有显著差异。
猪舌模拟器和 3D 打印模拟器在腭裂修补术的外科教育中都有其独特的优势。因此,猪舌和 3D 打印腭裂模拟器的联合使用是一种有效的教育模型,可以练习 Furlow 双反对 Z 腭裂修补术。猪舌模拟器在组织灵活性、柔韧性和缝合模拟器方面具有优势,而 3D 打印模拟器则可以反复练习各种腭裂修补技术,并且具有更好的面部和口腔模拟效果。