Lam A M, Grace D M, Manninen P H, Diamond C
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986 Nov;33(6):773-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03027129.
The efficacy of preanaesthetic intravenous cimetidine versus ranitidine with and without metoclopramide for acid aspiration prophylaxis was assessed in 60 morbidly obese patients in a double-blind manner. Group 1 patients received cimetidine 300 mg + saline. Group 2 patients received cimetidine 300 mg + metoclopramide 10 mg. Group 3 patients received ranitidine 100 mg + saline. Group 4 patients received ranitidine 100 mg + metoclopramide 10 mg. Gastric fluid was aspirated for analysis of volume and pH following induction of anaesthesia. All four premedication regimens were equally effective in reducing the gastric volume and acidity and the inclusion of metoclopramide had no additive effect. Although statistically not significant, two patients in the cimetidine groups remained at risk (volume greater than 25 ml and pH less than 2.5) while no patients in the ranitidine groups remained so.
采用双盲法对60例病态肥胖患者评估了麻醉前静脉注射西咪替丁与雷尼替丁加或不加甲氧氯普胺预防胃酸误吸的效果。第1组患者接受300 mg西咪替丁+生理盐水。第2组患者接受300 mg西咪替丁+10 mg甲氧氯普胺。第3组患者接受100 mg雷尼替丁+生理盐水。第4组患者接受100 mg雷尼替丁+10 mg甲氧氯普胺。麻醉诱导后抽取胃液分析其容量和pH值。所有四种术前用药方案在减少胃容量和酸度方面同样有效,加入甲氧氯普胺没有附加作用。虽然在统计学上无显著差异,但西咪替丁组有2例患者仍有风险(容量大于25 ml且pH值小于2.5),而雷尼替丁组没有患者仍有此风险。