Qi Dan, Zhang Jianjun
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 19;10:1235433. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1235433. eCollection 2023.
The aim of the current study was to investigate the potential relationship between anatomical characteristics of pulmonary veins (PVs) and atrial fibrillation recurrence (AFR) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), specifically focusing on PV diameter and cross-sectional orifices index (CSOA). The analysis was based on a comprehensive review of currently available literature, providing valuable insights for the prevention and treatment of AFR.
Data was collected from five databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane, spanning the period from 2004 to October 2022. The search strategy utilized Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to PV diameter, PV size, PV anatomy, and AFR. Indicators of PV diameter and CSOA from the included studies were collected and analyzed, with Weight mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) representing continuous variables.
The meta-analysis included six studies. The results revealed that patients with AFR had a significant larger mean PV diameter compared to those without AFR (MD 0.33; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.66; = 0.04; = 33.80%). In a meta-analysis of two studies involving a total of 715 participants, we compared the diameters of the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV), left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) between patients with AFR and patients without AFR. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the four data items (all > 0.05). Additionally, the pooled estimate revealed that LSPV-CSOA, LIPV-COSA, RSPV-COSA, and RIPV-CSOA were greater in the AFR group compared to the non-AFR group, but the differences were not statistically significant (all > 0.05).
We found evidence supporting the notion that the PV diameter of patients who experienced AFR after RFCA was significantly larger than that of patients without AFR. The findings suggested that the PV diameter could serve as a potential predictor of the risk of AFR following RFCA.
本研究的目的是调查肺静脉(PVs)的解剖特征与射频导管消融(RFCA)后房颤复发(AFR)之间的潜在关系,特别关注肺静脉直径和横截面积指数(CSOA)。该分析基于对现有文献的全面综述,为房颤复发的预防和治疗提供了有价值的见解。
从包括PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane在内的五个数据库中收集2004年至2022年10月期间的数据。检索策略使用了与肺静脉直径、肺静脉大小、肺静脉解剖结构和房颤复发相关的医学主题词(MeSH)。收集并分析纳入研究中的肺静脉直径和CSOA指标,以加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CIs)表示连续变量。
荟萃分析纳入了六项研究。结果显示,与未发生房颤复发的患者相比,发生房颤复发的患者平均肺静脉直径显著更大(MD 0.33;95% CI:0.01,0.66;P = 0.04;I² = 33.80%)。在一项对两项研究(共715名参与者)的荟萃分析中,我们比较了发生房颤复发的患者和未发生房颤复发的患者之间左上肺静脉(LSPV)、左下肺静脉(LIPV)、右上肺静脉(RSPV)、右下肺静脉(RIPV)的直径。结果显示,两组在这四项数据中的任何一项上均无统计学显著差异(均P > 0.05)。此外,汇总估计显示,与非房颤复发组相比,房颤复发组的LSPV - CSOA、LIPV - COSA、RSPV - COSA和RIPV - CSOA更大,但差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。
我们发现有证据支持以下观点,即射频导管消融后发生房颤复发的患者的肺静脉直径显著大于未发生房颤复发的患者。研究结果表明,肺静脉直径可作为射频导管消融后房颤复发风险的潜在预测指标。