呼吁在动物伦理审查中实施临床前研究注册。
A call to implement preclinical study registration in animal ethics review.
机构信息
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 5;21(10):e3002293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002293. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Abstract
Protocol registration is required in clinical trials. Registration of animal studies could improve research transparency and reduce redundancy, yet uptake has been minimal. Integrating study registration into institutional approval of animal use protocols is a promising approach to increase uptake.
摘要
临床试验需要进行方案注册。动物研究的注册可以提高研究透明度并减少重复，但采用率一直很低。将研究注册纳入动物使用方案的机构批准中，是提高采用率的一种有前途的方法。
相似文献
1
A call to implement preclinical study registration in animal ethics review.呼吁在动物伦理审查中实施临床前研究注册。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 5;21(10):e3002293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002293. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Regulatory, scientific, and ethical issues arising from institutional activity in one of the 90 Italian Research Ethics Committees.意大利90个研究伦理委员会之一的机构活动引发的监管、科学和伦理问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00605-7.
3
Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives.研究伦理委员会与批准后活动：一项关于欧洲研究伦理委员会代表观点的定性研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1897-1907. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2115773. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
4
Identification of ethics committees based on authors' disclosures: cross-sectional study of articles published in the European Journal of Anaesthesiology and a survey of ethics committees.基于作者披露信息识别伦理委员会：对发表于《欧洲麻醉学杂志》的文章的横断面研究及对伦理委员会的调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 8;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0289-y.
5
Site Variability in Regulatory Oversight for an International Study of Pediatric Sepsis.国际儿科脓毒症研究的监管监督中的站点变异性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;19(4):e180-e188. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001455.
6
The role of research ethics committees after the approval of clinical trial protocols in the EU and the USA: a descriptive content analysis of international and regional normative documents.临床试验方案在欧盟和美国获得批准后研究伦理委员会的作用：对国际和地区规范文件的描述性内容分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jun;37(6):1061-1069. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1905621. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
Central institutional ethics committee needed to facilitate timely review of multicenter clinical trials.需要中央机构伦理委员会来促进对多中心临床试验的及时审查。
J Postgrad Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;65(2):107-109. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_428_18.
8
Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.西班牙研究伦理委员会的表现。一项针对100份药物临床试验方案申请的前瞻性研究。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):268-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.268.
9
Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine.医学学术部门研究伦理委员会审批时间分析
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):145-50. doi: 10.1177/1556264615571557. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
10
Public titles of clinical trials should have ethics review.临床试验的公开标题应经过伦理审查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.016.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessment of transparency indicators in space medicine.空间医学透明度指标评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0300701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300701. eCollection 2024.
2
Finding the right power balance: Better study design and collaboration can reduce dependence on statistical power.找到合适的权力平衡：更好的研究设计和协作可以减少对统计功效的依赖。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jan 8;22(1):e3002423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002423. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
PLOS Biology at 20: Exploring possible futures.PLOS 生物学 20 周年：探索可能的未来。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 19;21(10):e3002377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002377. eCollection 2023 Oct.
本文引用的文献
1
Declaration of common standards for the preregistration of animal research-speeding up the scientific progress.动物研究预注册通用标准宣言——加速科学进步
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 16;1(1):pgac016. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac016. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Identifying barriers and enablers to rigorous conduct and reporting of preclinical laboratory studies.确定临床前实验室研究严谨实施和报告的障碍和促进因素。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jan 5;21(1):e3001932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001932. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
The EQIPD framework for rigor in the design, conduct, analysis and documentation of animal experiments.用于动物实验设计、实施、分析和记录的严格性的EQIPD框架。
Nat Methods. 2022 Nov;19(11):1334-1337. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01615-y.
4
Publication rate in preclinical research: a plea for preregistration.临床前研究中的发表率：呼吁进行预注册。
BMJ Open Sci. 2020 Aug 27;4(1):e100051. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2019-100051. eCollection 2020.
5
Behavior Change Techniques and Their Mechanisms of Action: A Synthesis of Links Described in Published Intervention Literature.行为改变技术及其作用机制：已发表干预文献中描述的联系综合。
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jul 17;53(8):693-707. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay078.
6
Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established.ICMJE政策制定11年后的试验注册最新情况。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):383-391. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1601330.
7
Animal Study Registries: Results from a Stakeholder Analysis on Potential Strengths, Weaknesses, Facilitators, and Barriers.动物研究注册机构：利益相关者对潜在优势、劣势、促进因素和障碍的分析结果
PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 10;14(11):e2000391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000391. eCollection 2016 Nov.
8
Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke.所有的啮齿动物都去哪儿了？癌症与中风实验研究中的损耗效应。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 4;14(1):e1002331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002331. eCollection 2016 Jan.
9
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.呼吁透明报告，以优化临床前研究的预测价值。
Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91. doi: 10.1038/nature11556.
10
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.动物中风研究报告中的发表偏倚导致疗效的严重夸大。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Mar 30;8(3):e1000344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344.
Zotero 插件