Business School, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China.
School of Sport Communication and Information Technology, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0287109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287109. eCollection 2023.
Innovation drive differs from investment drive and resource drive in that it focuses on knowledge and skills to promote productivity growth. By integrating technical standards within the framework of an innovation-driven development system in this work, theoretical implications for this development strategy may be revealed. Following our theoretical study, we built a PECM utilizing China's inter-provincial panel data from 2007 to 2020 to investigate the long and short-term relationships between standardization, R&D, and innovation-driven development. The following are the key findings: First, both standardization and R&D are the nation's critical engines of innovation-driven development. Second, standardization has the greatest impact on TFP through improving technical efficiency, whereas R&D drives both technical development and technical efficiency improvement. Third, while the influence of technical standard drafters' production scale on scale efficiency was insignificant from 2007 to 2013, it became substantial after 2014 with China's macroeconomic reform of "transforming the mode and changing the structure."
创新驱动与投资驱动和资源驱动的区别在于，它专注于知识和技能，以促进生产力增长。通过在创新驱动发展体系的框架内整合技术标准，本工作可能揭示了这一发展战略的理论意义。在理论研究之后，我们利用中国 2007 年至 2020 年的省级面板数据构建了一个 PECM，以研究标准化、研发与创新驱动发展之间的长期和短期关系。主要发现如下：第一，标准化和研发都是国家创新驱动发展的关键引擎。第二，标准化通过提高技术效率对 TFP 的影响最大，而研发则推动技术发展和技术效率提高。第三，虽然技术标准起草者的生产规模对规模效率的影响在 2007 年至 2013 年期间并不显著，但在 2014 年中国“转变方式、调整结构”的宏观经济改革后，这一影响变得显著。
