School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292436. eCollection 2023.
While working in the heat is a common practice within the Australian mining industry, it can lead to adverse effects on cognitive function, productivity, and physical health. This study aimed to compare the thermal strain experienced by maintenance workers and service workers in the mining industry during summer. Psycho-physiological parameters, manual dexterity, and cognitive function were assessed in maintenance workers (n = 12) and service workers (n = 12) employed at mine site villages in north-west Australia. Maintenance workers had the freedom to self-select their work intensity and predominantly worked outdoors (33.9±4.2°C, 38±18% RH), whereas service workers had to work to a fixed schedule and worked intermittently indoors (∼64% of work shift; 29.5±3.4°C, 48±8% RH) and outdoors (∼36%; 35.4±4.6°C, 47±21% RH). All workers underwent assessment at the beginning (day 2/3), middle (day 7/8), and end of their swing (day 13/14), at various time points throughout their 11-12 h shift. Service workers completed more steps (11282±1794 vs. 7774±2821; p<0.001), experienced a higher heart rate (p = 0.049) and reported higher ratings of perceived exertion (p<0.001), thermal discomfort (p<0.001), thermal sensation (p<0.001), and fatigue (p<0.012) compared to maintenance workers. Urinary specific gravity values were higher (less hydrated) in service workers (1.024±0.007) compared to maintenance workers (1.018±0.006; p = 0.007), with USG being overall higher post- compared to pre-shift (1.022±0.008 vs. 1.020±0.006; p<0.05). Core temperature, working memory capacity, processing speed and manual dexterity did not differ between occupations. Workers in hot environments who cannot self-select their work intensity should be educated about the importance of hydration before, during, and after their work-shifts and provided with more scheduled rest breaks during their shift. Employers should closely monitor workers for symptoms of heat illness, discomfort, and fatigue to ensure the health and safety of the workers.
虽然在澳大利亚采矿业中,在高温环境下工作是一种常见做法,但这可能会对认知功能、生产力和身体健康产生不利影响。本研究旨在比较夏季采矿行业中维护工人和服务工人所经历的热应激。在澳大利亚西北部矿区村庄工作的 12 名维护工人(n=12)和 12 名服务工人(n=12)接受了心理生理参数、手眼协调能力和认知功能评估。维护工人可以自由选择工作强度,并且主要在户外工作(33.9±4.2°C,38±18% RH),而服务工人必须按照固定时间表工作,并且间歇性地在室内(约 64%的工作时间;29.5±3.4°C,48±8% RH)和户外(约 36%;35.4±4.6°C,47±21% RH)工作。所有工人在他们的 11-12 小时轮班的不同时间点,在开始(第 2/3 天)、中间(第 7/8 天)和结束(第 13/14 天)进行评估。服务工人完成的步数更多(11282±1794 比 7774±2821;p<0.001),心率更高(p=0.049),并且报告的用力感知更高(p<0.001),热不适(p<0.001),热感觉(p<0.001)和疲劳(p<0.012)比维护工人高。与维护工人相比,服务工人的尿比重值更高(水分较少)(1.024±0.007 比 1.018±0.006;p=0.007),并且 USG 在轮班后总体上高于轮班前(1.022±0.008 比 1.020±0.006;p<0.05)。核心体温、工作记忆容量、处理速度和手眼协调能力在两种职业之间没有差异。无法自我选择工作强度的高温环境下的工人应该在工作前、工作中和工作后接受有关水合作用重要性的教育,并在轮班期间提供更多有规律的休息时间。雇主应密切监测工人的中暑症状、不适和疲劳,以确保工人的健康和安全。