Department of Information and Communications Engineering, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Tassica, C/ José Zorrilla, 132, 1ºE, Segovia, 40003, Spain.
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Nov;179:105232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105232. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
Despite current standardization actions towards the unification between European Union (EU) countries, there is still much work to do. In this context, this paper aims to offer a comprehensive analysis of the limitations of the EU concerning emergency situations, specifically in cross-border, cross-hierarchical, and cross-sectorial emergencies, as well as the analysis of emergent opportunities for improvement. The final goal of this analysis is to serve as an initial step for pre-standardizing these opportunities.
This work, performed in the context of the EU H2020 VALKYRIES project, first analyzed existing gaps from three dimensions: technological, procedural, collaboration, and training. Each gap was obtained from the literature, professional experience within VALKYRIES, or a consultation process on EU emergency agencies. This research subsequently obtained a list of opportunities from these limitations, aggregating those opportunities with similarities to ease their study. Then, this work prioritized the opportunities based on their feasibility and positive impact, performing an additional consultation process to EU emergencies for validation. Finally, this investigation provided a roadmap for pre-standardization for the five top-ranked opportunities per dimension.
This paper presents a set of 303 gaps and 255 opportunities across technological, procedural, collaboration, and training dimensions. After clustering the opportunities, this work provides a final set of 82 meta opportunities for improving emergency actions in the EU, prioritized based on their feasibility for adoption and positive impact. Finally, this work documents the roadmaps for three top-ranked opportunities for conciseness.
This publication highlights the limitations and opportunities in the EU concerning emergency agencies and, more specifically, those existing in cross-border and multi-casualty incidents. This work concludes that there is still room for improvement despite the current measures toward harmonization and standardization.
尽管欧盟(EU)国家目前正在采取标准化措施以实现统一,但仍有许多工作要做。在这种情况下,本文旨在全面分析欧盟在紧急情况方面的局限性,特别是在跨境、跨层次和跨部门紧急情况方面,并分析改进的机会。该分析的最终目标是作为对这些机会进行标准化之前的初步步骤。
这项工作是在欧盟 H2020 VALKYRIES 项目的背景下进行的,首先从技术、程序、合作和培训三个维度分析了现有差距。每个差距都是从文献、VALKYRIES 中的专业经验或对欧盟应急机构的咨询过程中获得的。本研究随后从这些局限性中获得了一系列机会,将具有相似性的机会汇总在一起,以便于研究。然后,根据可行性和积极影响对机会进行优先级排序,并对欧盟紧急情况进行额外的咨询以验证。最后,这项研究为每个维度的前五项机会提供了预标准化路线图。
本文提出了一套跨越技术、程序、合作和培训维度的 303 个差距和 255 个机会。在对机会进行聚类后,这项工作最终提供了 82 个用于改善欧盟应急行动的元机会,根据其采用的可行性和积极影响进行了优先级排序。最后,为了简洁起见,本文还记录了三个排名最高的机会的路线图。
本出版物强调了欧盟在应急机构方面的局限性和机会,特别是在跨境和多伤亡事件方面。这项工作的结论是,尽管目前正在采取协调和标准化措施,但仍有改进的空间。