Orange Charles, Lanhers Charlotte, Coll Guillaume, Coste Nicolas, Dutheil Frederic, Hauret Isabelle, Pereira Bruno, Coudeyre Emmanuel
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, CMPR Maurice Gantchoula Pionsat, France; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, INRAE, UNH, Université Clermont-Auvergne, university hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, CMPR Maurice Gantchoula Pionsat, France.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.027. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
To identify prognostic factors for return to work (RTW) after stroke.
PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase were systematically searched.
Studies had to include people of working age (<65 years old) at the time of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or subarachnoid hemorrhage). The evaluation of RTW and rate of RTW had to be mentioned. Study selection was done by 2 independent authors. In total, 1241 articles were screened, 39 met all inclusion criteria.
Characteristics of included studies were recorded independently by 2 authors. Differences were resolved through discussion or with a third author. Quality was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality assessment tool.
Among the 39 studies, prognostic factors for RTW were hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratio 0.53 [95% confidence interval 0.45-0.60], n=18 studies), sex (men) (1.26 [1.14-1.40], n=31), aphasia (0.37 [0.20-0.69], n=7), occupation (white collar worker) (1.84 [1.64-2.06], n=17), independence in activities of daily living (3.99 [1.73-9.23], n=7), and stroke severity (NIHSS) (1.23 [1.08-1.39], n=6).
This meta-analysis highlighted positive and negative prognostic factors associated with RTW after stroke. Two categories were distinguished: modifiable and non-modifiable prognostic factors. This study provides information to help understand the issues, set appropriate objectives and implement appropriate strategies to guide people to RTW after stroke. Randomized controlled studies are needed to better evaluate work-place intervention programs as well as the effects of intravenous thrombolysis, and cognitive and neuropsychological rehabilitation on return-to-work rates after stroke.
确定中风后恢复工作(RTW)的预后因素。
对PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane和Embase进行了系统检索。
研究必须纳入中风时(缺血性、出血性或蛛网膜下腔出血)处于工作年龄(<65岁)的人群。必须提及对RTW的评估和RTW率。研究选择由2位独立作者完成。总共筛选了1241篇文章,39篇符合所有纳入标准。
纳入研究的特征由2位作者独立记录。差异通过讨论或与第三位作者解决。使用苏格兰校际指南网络质量评估工具评估质量。
在39项研究中,RTW的预后因素为出血性中风(比值比0.53[95%置信区间0.45 - 0.60],n = 18项研究)、性别(男性)(1.26[1.14 - 1.40],n = 31)、失语(0.37[0.20 - 0.69],n = 7)、职业(白领)(1.84[1.64 - 2.06],n = 17)、日常生活活动独立性(3.99[1.73 - 9.23],n = 7)以及中风严重程度(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS])(1.23[1.08 - 1.39],n = 6)。
这项荟萃分析突出了与中风后RTW相关的正性和负性预后因素。区分了两类:可改变和不可改变的预后因素。本研究提供了信息,以帮助理解相关问题、设定适当目标并实施适当策略,以指导中风患者恢复工作。需要进行随机对照研究,以更好地评估工作场所干预项目以及静脉溶栓、认知和神经心理康复对中风后恢复工作率的影响。