Avance Janayna, de Menezes Kênia K P, Boening Augusto, Pereira Natalia D, Nascimento Lucas R
Center of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
NeuroGroup, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Oct 5. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10240-9.
To measure the test-retest reliability and the clinical usefulness of the Work Limitation Questionnaire, and to compare the in-person with the telephone application.
Cross-sectional, exploratory study. The Work Limitation Questionnaire was answered three times: twice in person, to measure test-retest reliability and clinical usefulness, and once, by telephone, to measure the validity of the telephone application.
Fifty-six individuals (32 men) with mild to moderate disabilities after stroke were included. Test-retest reliability was very high (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.94 to 0.98; p < 0.01), the clinical usefulness was high (9 out of 12 points), and the correlation between in-person and telephone applications was high (ρ = 0.7; 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9; p < 0.01). The average productivity loss was 4% (SD 5, min-max 0 to 15%).
The Work Limitation Questionnaire showed adequate test-retest reliability and clinical usefulness in individuals with stroke. The telephone application produced comparable results to in-person applications. The participants reported low productivity loss, which may be related to the mild impairments of the included sample.
测量工作限制问卷的重测信度和临床实用性，并比较当面应用与电话应用的情况。
横断面探索性研究。工作限制问卷共进行三次作答：两次当面作答，用于测量重测信度和临床实用性；一次通过电话作答，用于测量电话应用的有效性。
纳入了56名中风后有轻度至中度残疾的个体（32名男性）。重测信度非常高（组内相关系数ICC为0.96；95%置信区间为0.94至0.98；p < 0.01），临床实用性高（12分中得9分），当面应用与电话应用之间的相关性高（ρ = 0.7；95%置信区间为0.5至0.9；p < 0.01）。平均生产力损失为4%（标准差为5，最小值 - 最大值为0至15%）。
工作限制问卷在中风个体中显示出足够的重测信度和临床实用性。电话应用产生的结果与当面应用相当。参与者报告的生产力损失较低，这可能与所纳入样本的轻度损伤有关。
