Suppr超能文献

蒙特利尔认知评估简短版和标准版的预后测试准确性

The Prognostic Test Accuracy of the Short and Standard Forms of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

作者信息

Abzhandadze Tamar, Berg Olga I, Mavridis Anastasios, Lindvall Elias, Quinn Terry, Sunnerhagen Katharina S, Lundström Erik

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Jul 22:1-7. doi: 10.1159/000540372.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment is a critical concern in stroke care, and international guidelines recommend early cognitive screening. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic accuracy of both the short and standard forms of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in predicting long-term cognitive recovery following a stroke.

METHODS

For this study, we used data from the Efficacy of Fluoxetine - a Randomized Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS) study, which encompassed stroke patients from 35 Swedish centers over the period from 2014 to 2019. Cognitive assessments were initially conducted at 2-15 days post-stroke, with follow-up data gathered at 6 months. We used the MoCA for objective cognitive evaluation. For assessing subjective cognitive impairment, we used the memory and thinking domain of the Stroke Impact Scale. For psychometric evaluation of the short Swedish version of MoCA (s-MoCA-SWE), we used cross tables and binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 1,141 patients (62.2% men; median [interquartile range; IQR] age, 72.3 [13.2] years; median [IQR] stroke severity, 3.0 [3.0]). At baseline, the prevalence of cognitive impairment was 71.7% according to the s-MoCA-SWE (≤12) and 67.0% according to the MoCA (≤25). The s-MoCA-SWE demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.3% for correctly identifying patients with objective cognitive impairment and 81.5% for identifying those with subjective impairments at 6 months. Although the s-MoCA-SWE had higher sensitivity, the MoCA had a more balanced sensitivity and specificity in detecting both subjective and objective cognitive impairments. In both crude and multivariable models, the s-MoCA-SWE was more strongly associated than the MoCA with cognitive impairment at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the short and standard versions of the MoCA appear to be effective in identifying individuals likely to experience persistent cognitive issues following a stroke. Considering the limited time available in an acute stroke unit, the short-form version may be more practical. Nevertheless, further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

摘要

引言

认知障碍是卒中护理中的一个关键问题,国际指南建议进行早期认知筛查。本研究的目的是确定蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的简短版和标准版在预测卒中后长期认知恢复方面的预后准确性。

方法

在本研究中,我们使用了来自氟西汀疗效——卒中随机对照试验(EFFECTS)研究的数据,该研究涵盖了2014年至2019年期间来自瑞典35个中心的卒中患者。认知评估最初在卒中后2 - 15天进行,随访数据在6个月时收集。我们使用MoCA进行客观认知评估。为了评估主观认知障碍,我们使用了卒中影响量表的记忆和思维领域。对于瑞典语简短版MoCA(s - MoCA - SWE)的心理测量评估,我们使用了交叉表和二元逻辑回归。

结果

该研究纳入了1141名患者(62.2%为男性;年龄中位数[四分位间距;IQR]为72.3[13.2]岁;卒中严重程度中位数[IQR]为3.0[3.0])。在基线时,根据s - MoCA - SWE(≤12分),认知障碍的患病率为71.7%,根据MoCA(≤25分)为67.0%。s - MoCA - SWE在6个月时正确识别客观认知障碍患者的敏感性为92.3%,识别主观认知障碍患者的敏感性为81.5%。虽然s - MoCA - SWE具有更高的敏感性,但MoCA在检测主观和客观认知障碍方面具有更平衡的敏感性和特异性。在粗模型和多变量模型中,s - MoCA - SWE在6个月时与认知障碍的关联比MoCA更强。

结论

MoCA的简短版和标准版似乎都能有效识别卒中后可能出现持续性认知问题的个体。考虑到急性卒中单元的时间有限,简短版可能更实用。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验