Younis O, Hughes D O, Weber F N
Am J Orthod. 1979 Jun;75(6):678-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90099-x.
One hundred twenty previously extracted premolar teeth were used in this study. Teeth were divided into five groups of twenty-four each. The first group was treated with Copalite, the second with Portrait Veneer, the third with a polymeric adhesive coating material (Protecto), the fourth group with Nuva-Seal, and the fifth group served as a control. Orthodontic bands were selected and cemented to each tooth. The cement seal was then broken and teeth were thermocycled to simulate an in vivo condition. All teeth were then submerged in a decalcifying gelatin for 21 weeks. Every group was further broken into three equal subdivisions. Division A was to be submerged for 7 weeks, Division B in each group was to be submerged for 14 weeks, and Division C was to be submerged for 21 weeks. At each time interval, teeth were cleaned and examined for decalcification. Data were recorded and analyzed by means of the chi-square test. It was found that acid-etching materials protect the teeth against decalcification best. Among the acid-etching materials used, Nuva-Seal proved to be the best at protecting the teeth against decalcification for 21 weeks with this experimental design.
本研究使用了120颗先前拔除的前磨牙。牙齿被分为五组,每组24颗。第一组用Copalite处理,第二组用Portrait Veneer处理,第三组用聚合粘合剂涂层材料(Protecto)处理,第四组用Nuva-Seal处理,第五组作为对照。选择正畸带并粘固到每颗牙齿上。然后打破粘固密封,对牙齿进行热循环以模拟体内情况。之后将所有牙齿浸泡在脱钙明胶中21周。每组再进一步分成三个相等的细分组。A组浸泡7周,每组的B组浸泡14周,C组浸泡21周。在每个时间间隔,清洁牙齿并检查脱钙情况。通过卡方检验记录和分析数据。结果发现,酸蚀材料对牙齿防脱钙效果最佳。在所用的酸蚀材料中,按照本实验设计,Nuva-Seal在保护牙齿21周防脱钙方面被证明是最佳的。