Dumonceau Jean-Marc, Costamagna Guido, Tringali Andrea, Vahedi Kouroche, Delhaye Myriam, Hittelet Axel, Spera Gianluca, Giostra Emiliano, Mutignani Massimiliano, De Maertelaer Viviane, Devière Jacques
Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Gut. 2007 Apr;56(4):545-52. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.096883. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
In chronic pancreatitis, obstruction of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) may contribute to the pathogenesis of pain. Pilot studies suggest that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) alone relieves pain in calcified chronic pancreatitis.
To compare ESWL alone with ESWL and endoscopic drainage of the MPD for treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.
Patients with uncomplicated painful chronic pancreatitis and calcifications obstructing the MPD.
55 patients were randomised to ESWL alone (n = 26) or ESWL combined with endoscopy (n = 29).
2 years after trial intervention, 10 (38%) and 13 (45%) patients of the ESWL alone and ESWL combined with endoscopy group, respectively, had presented pain relapse (primary outcome) (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.23 to 2.57). In both groups, a similar decrease was seen after treatment in the MPD diameter (mean decrease 1.7 mm; 95% CI 0.9 to 2.6; p<0.001), and in the number of pain episodes/year (mean decrease, 3.7; 95% CI 2.6 to 4.9; p<0.001). Treatment costs per patient were three times higher in the ESWL combined with endoscopy group compared with the ESWL alone group (p = 0.001). The median delay between the onset of chronic pancreatitis and persistent pain relief for both groups was 1.1 year (95% CI 0.7 to 1.6), as compared with 4 years (95% CI 3 to 4) for the natural history of chronic pancreatitis in a reference cohort (p<0.001).
ESWL is a safe and effective preferred treatment for selected patients with painful calcified chronic pancreatitis. Combining systematic endoscopy with ESWL adds to the cost of patient care, without improving the outcome of pancreatic pain.
在慢性胰腺炎中,主胰管(MPD)梗阻可能参与疼痛的发病机制。初步研究表明,单纯体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)可缓解钙化性慢性胰腺炎的疼痛。
比较单纯ESWL与ESWL联合MPD内镜引流治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的效果。
患有无并发症的疼痛性慢性胰腺炎且钙化灶阻塞MPD的患者。
55例患者被随机分为单纯ESWL组(n = 26)或ESWL联合内镜组(n = 29)。
试验干预2年后,单纯ESWL组和ESWL联合内镜组分别有10例(38%)和13例(45%)患者出现疼痛复发(主要结局)(比值比0.77;95%置信区间0.23至2.57)。两组治疗后MPD直径均有相似程度减小(平均减小1.7 mm;95%置信区间0.9至2.6;p<0.001),每年疼痛发作次数也有相似程度减少(平均减少3.7次;95%置信区间2.6至4.9;p<0.001)。ESWL联合内镜组的每位患者治疗费用比单纯ESWL组高3倍(p = 0.001)。两组慢性胰腺炎发病至持续疼痛缓解的中位延迟时间均为1.1年(95%置信区间0.7至1.6),而参考队列中慢性胰腺炎自然病程的该时间为4年(95%置信区间3至4)(p<0.001)。
对于选定的疼痛性钙化性慢性胰腺炎患者,ESWL是一种安全有效的首选治疗方法。将系统性内镜检查与ESWL联合使用会增加患者护理成本,且未改善胰腺疼痛的治疗效果。